California School of Professional Psychology, Alliant International University, San Francisco, CA 94133, USA.
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2010 Mar;47(1):68-82. doi: 10.1037/a0018839.
A tradition stretching back to early Greek philosophy has described the mind as a field of struggle or even battle. This comparison has been termed the agonistic metaphor, based on the Hellenistic notion of athletic contests. Today, it is not uncommon for psychotherapists and the general public to seek solutions to mental health problems agonistically. Examples of this are cited from major psychodynamic, cognitive, behavioral, family, and humanistic theorists, and advantages and disadvantages of the metaphor are explored. Although agonistic thinking can energize clients and ennoble the therapeutic journey, it runs the risk of ignoring educative aspects of problematic situations and ironically perpetuating the resistance it predicts.
一种可以追溯到早期希腊哲学的传统将思维描述为一个斗争甚至战斗的领域。这种比较被称为竞争隐喻,基于希腊化时期的竞技观念。如今,精神治疗师和普通大众寻求以竞争的方式解决心理健康问题并不罕见。从主要的精神分析、认知、行为、家庭和人本主义理论家那里举出了这方面的例子,并探讨了该隐喻的优缺点。虽然竞争思维可以激发客户的积极性并使治疗之旅更加高尚,但它也有可能忽略问题情况的教育方面,并具有讽刺意味地延续它所预测的阻力。