• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症护理结果研究和监测联盟参与者与监测、流行病学和最终结果计划的代表性。

Representativeness of participants in the cancer care outcomes research and surveillance consortium relative to the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program.

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215-5450, USA.

出版信息

Med Care. 2013 Feb;51(2):e9-15. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318222a711.

DOI:10.1097/MLR.0b013e318222a711
PMID:22406968
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3654676/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The research goals of the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance (CanCORS) Consortium are to determine how characteristics and beliefs of patients, providers, and health care organizations influence the treatments and outcomes of individuals with newly diagnosed lung and colorectal cancers. As CanCORS results will inform national policy, it is important to know how they generalize to the United States population with these cancers.

RESEARCH DESIGN

This study assessed the representativeness of the CanCORS cohort of 10,547 patients with lung cancer (LC) or colorectal cancer (CRC) enrolled between 2003 and 2005. We compared characteristics (sex, race, age, and disease stage) with the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) population of 234,464 patients with new onset of these cancers during the CanCORS recruitment period.

RESULTS

The CanCORS sample is well matched to the SEER Program for both cancers. In CanCORS, 41% LC/47% CRC were female versus 47% LC/49% CRC in SEER. African American, Hispanic, and Asian cases differed by no more than 5 percentage points between CanCORS and SEER. The SEER population is slightly older, with the percentage of patients older than 75 years 33.1% LC/37.3% CRC in SEER versus 26.9% LC/29.4% in CanCORS, and also has a slightly higher proportion of early stage patients. We also found that the CanCORS cohort was representative within specific SEER regions that map closely to CanCORS sites.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that the CanCORS Consortium was successful in enrolling a demographically representative sample within the CanCORS regions.

摘要

背景

癌症护理结果研究和监测(CanCORS)联盟的研究目标是确定患者、医生和医疗机构的特征和信念如何影响新诊断出的肺癌和结直肠癌患者的治疗和结果。由于 CanCORS 的研究结果将为国家政策提供信息,因此了解它们如何推广到美国患有这些癌症的人群中非常重要。

研究设计

本研究评估了 2003 年至 2005 年间招募的 10547 例肺癌(LC)或结直肠癌(CRC)患者的 CanCORS 队列的代表性。我们将特征(性别、种族、年龄和疾病阶段)与在 CanCORS 招募期间患有这些癌症的新发病例的监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)人群(234464 例)进行了比较。

结果

CanCORS 样本与 SEER 计划在这两种癌症上都非常匹配。在 CanCORS 中,41%的 LC/47%的 CRC 为女性,而 SEER 中为 47%的 LC/49%的 CRC。非裔美国人、西班牙裔和亚洲人的病例在 CanCORS 和 SEER 之间相差不超过 5 个百分点。SEER 人群年龄稍大,75 岁以上患者的比例为 33.1%的 LC/37.3%的 CRC,而 CanCORS 中为 26.9%的 LC/29.4%,并且早期阶段患者的比例也略高。我们还发现,CanCORS 队列在与 CanCORS 站点密切相关的特定 SEER 区域内具有代表性。

结论

本研究表明,CanCORS 联盟成功地在 CanCORS 区域内招募了具有代表性的人群。

相似文献

1
Representativeness of participants in the cancer care outcomes research and surveillance consortium relative to the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program.癌症护理结果研究和监测联盟参与者与监测、流行病学和最终结果计划的代表性。
Med Care. 2013 Feb;51(2):e9-15. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318222a711.
2
A comparison of breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancers reported to the National Cancer Data Base and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program.向国家癌症数据库以及监测、流行病学和最终结果计划报告的乳腺癌、结直肠癌、肺癌和前列腺癌的比较。
Cancer. 1997 May 15;79(10):2052-61. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19970515)79:10<2052::aid-cncr29>3.0.co;2-s.
3
Colorectal cancer incidence in the United States, 1999-2004 : an updated analysis of data from the National Program of Cancer Registries and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program.1999 - 2004年美国结直肠癌发病率:来自国家癌症登记计划和监测、流行病学及最终结果计划数据的更新分析
Cancer. 2009 May 1;115(9):1967-76. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24216.
4
Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2002, featuring population-based trends in cancer treatment.《1975 - 2002年全国癌症状况年度报告》,重点介绍基于人群的癌症治疗趋势。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Oct 5;97(19):1407-27. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji289.
5
Increased risk for colorectal cancer under age 50 in racial and ethnic minorities living in the United States.在美国生活的少数族裔中,50岁以下人群患结直肠癌的风险增加。
Cancer Med. 2015 Dec;4(12):1863-70. doi: 10.1002/cam4.560. Epub 2015 Oct 16.
6
Understanding cancer patients' experience and outcomes: development and pilot study of the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance patient survey.了解癌症患者的经历与治疗结果:癌症护理结果研究与监测患者调查的开发与初步研究
Support Care Cancer. 2006 Aug;14(8):837-48. doi: 10.1007/s00520-005-0902-8. Epub 2006 Feb 16.
7
Trends in Incidence of Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer in the United States Among Those Approaching Screening Age.美国接近筛查年龄人群的早发性结直肠癌发病率趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1920407. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.20407.
8
Incidence and Survival for Patients Diagnosed With Breast, Colorectal, and Lung Cancer in an Integrated System.在一个综合系统中诊断出患有乳腺癌、结直肠癌和肺癌的患者的发病率和生存率。
Perm J. 2023 Dec 15;27(4):129-135. doi: 10.7812/TPP/23.021. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
9
Incidence patterns of colorectal cancers in four countries of the Middle East Cancer Consortium (Cyprus, Jordan, Israel, and İzmir, Turkey) compared with those in the United States Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program.中东癌症联盟(塞浦路斯、约旦、以色列和土耳其伊兹密尔)四个国家的结直肠癌发病模式与美国监测、流行病学和最终结果计划中的模式比较。
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan;29(1):36-44. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2018.17263.
10
Characteristics of colorectal cancer in the human immunodeficiency virus-infected African American population.感染人类免疫缺陷病毒的非裔美国人群中结直肠癌的特征。
Med Oncol. 2012 Sep;29(3):1773-9. doi: 10.1007/s12032-011-0015-9. Epub 2011 Jun 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing adult-child and spousal caregiver burden and potential contributors.比较成人-儿童和配偶照顾者的负担和潜在贡献因素。
Cancer. 2022 May 15;128(10):2015-2024. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34164. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
2
Association of Patient-Reported Physician Awareness of Complementary Medicine, Medical Care Experience and Care Quality.患者报告的医生对补充医学的认知、医疗护理体验与护理质量之间的关联
J Patient Exp. 2021 Oct 27;8:23743735211049665. doi: 10.1177/23743735211049665. eCollection 2021.
3
Exploring the role of general practitioners in addressing financial toxicity in cancer patients.探讨全科医生在解决癌症患者经济毒性问题中的作用。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Jan;30(1):457-464. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06420-5. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
4
Bayesian data fusion: Probabilistic sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding using informative priors based on secondary data.贝叶斯数据分析融合:基于二次数据的信息先验概率对未测量混杂因素的概率敏感性分析。
Biometrics. 2022 Jun;78(2):730-741. doi: 10.1111/biom.13436. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
5
Patient and proxy reports regarding the experience of treatment decision-making in cancer care.患者及其代理人报告癌症治疗决策过程中的体验。
Psychooncology. 2020 Nov;29(11):1943-1950. doi: 10.1002/pon.5528. Epub 2020 Sep 27.
6
Performance of Cancer Recurrence Algorithms After Coding Scheme Switch From International Classification of Diseases 9th Revision to International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision.编码方案从《国际疾病分类》第九版转换为第十版后癌症复发算法的性能
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2019 Mar;3:1-9. doi: 10.1200/CCI.18.00113.
7
Determining the Time of Cancer Recurrence Using Claims or Electronic Medical Record Data.利用理赔数据或电子病历数据确定癌症复发时间
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2018 Dec;2:1-10. doi: 10.1200/CCI.17.00163.
8
Factors contributing to disparities in mortality among patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.导致非小细胞肺癌患者死亡率差异的因素。
Cancer Med. 2018 Nov;7(11):5832-5842. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1796. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
9
The Association of Proxy Care Engagement with Proxy Reports of Patient Experience and Quality of Life.代理人参与度与代理人报告的患者体验和生活质量的关联。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct;53(5):3809-3824. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12980. Epub 2018 May 27.
10
The accuracy of chemotherapy ascertainment among colorectal cancer patients in the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results registry program.监测、流行病学和最终结果注册计划中结直肠癌患者化疗确定的准确性。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Apr 27;18(1):481. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4405-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Representativeness of population-based cancer registration in China--comparison of urban and rural areas.中国基于人群的癌症登记的代表性——城乡比较。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2009 Oct-Dec;10(4):559-64.
2
Understanding cancer treatment and outcomes: the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance Consortium.了解癌症治疗与治疗结果:癌症护理结果研究与监测联盟
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Aug 1;22(15):2992-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.06.020.
3
Validity and representativity in the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group--a study on protocol allocation and data validity from one county to a multi-centre database.丹麦乳腺癌合作组中的有效性与代表性——一项关于从一个县到多中心数据库的方案分配和数据有效性的研究
Acta Oncol. 2003;42(3):179-85. doi: 10.1080/02841860310000737.
4
The case identification challenge in measuring quality of cancer care.衡量癌症护理质量中的病例识别挑战。
J Clin Oncol. 2002 Nov 1;20(21):4353-60. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.05.527.
5
Overview of the SEER-Medicare data: content, research applications, and generalizability to the United States elderly population.SEER-医疗保险数据概述:内容、研究应用及对美国老年人群的普遍性
Med Care. 2002 Aug;40(8 Suppl):IV-3-18. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000020942.47004.03.
6
Generalizability of the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results registry population: factors relevant to epidemiologic and health care research.监测、流行病学和最终结果登记人群的可推广性:与流行病学和医疗保健研究相关的因素。
J Clin Epidemiol. 1997 Aug;50(8):939-45. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(97)00099-1.
7
Representativeness of the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program data: recent trends in cancer mortality rates.监测、流行病学和最终结果计划数据的代表性:癌症死亡率的近期趋势
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1992 Jun 3;84(11):872-7. doi: 10.1093/jnci/84.11.872.