Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Program on Aging, P.O Box 725, 3500 AS Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2012 Jul;49(7):822-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.02.003. Epub 2012 Mar 11.
Healthcare workers in nursing homes are faced with high job demands that can have a detrimental impact on job-related outcomes, such as job satisfaction. Job resources may have a buffering role on this relationship. The Demand-Control-Support (DCS) Model offers a theoretical framework to study how specific job resources can buffer the adverse effects of high demands, and can even activate positive consequences of high demands.
The present study tests the moderating (i.e. buffering and activating) effects of decision authority and coworker- and supervisor support that are assumed by the hypotheses of the DCS Model.
A national cross-sectional survey was conducted with an anonymous questionnaire.
One hundred and thirty six living arrangements that provide nursing home care for people with dementia in the Netherlands.
Fifteen healthcare workers per living arrangement. In total, 1147 people filled out the questionnaires (59% response rate).
Hierarchical multilevel regression analyses were conducted to test the assumption that the effect of job demands on the dependent variables is buffered or activated the most when both decision authority and social support are high. This moderation is statistically represented by three-way interactions (i.e. demands×authority×support), while lower-order effects are taken into account (i.e. two-way interactions). The hypotheses are supported when three-way interaction effects are found in the expected direction. The dependent variables studied are job satisfaction, emotional exhaustion, and personal accomplishment.
The proposed buffering and activation hypotheses of the DCS Model were not supported in our study. Three-way interaction effects were found for emotional exhaustion and personal accomplishment, though not in the expected direction. In addition, two-way interaction effects were found for job satisfaction and emotional exhaustion. Decision authority was found to buffer the adverse effect of job demands and to activate healthcare staff. Supervisor support was found to buffer the adverse effect of job demands on emotional exhaustion in situations with low decision authority. Finally, coworker support was found to have an adverse effect on personal accomplishment in high strain situations.
Findings reveal that decision authority in particular makes healthcare workers in nursing homes less vulnerable to adverse effects of high job demands, and promotes positive consequences of work.
养老院的医护人员面临着高工作要求,这可能对工作相关结果(如工作满意度)产生不利影响。工作资源可能在这种关系中起到缓冲作用。需求-控制-支持(DCS)模型提供了一个理论框架,用于研究特定的工作资源如何缓冲高需求的不利影响,甚至可以激活高需求的积极后果。
本研究检验了假设的决策自主权和同事支持以及主管支持的调节(即缓冲和激活)作用。
采用全国性横断面调查,采用匿名问卷进行。
荷兰为痴呆症患者提供养老院护理的 136 个居住安排。
每个居住安排有 15 名医护人员。共有 1147 人填写了问卷(59%的回应率)。
采用分层多元回归分析,检验工作需求对因变量的影响在决策自主权和社会支持都高时缓冲或激活最大的假设。这种调节在统计学上由三因素交互作用(即需求×权威×支持)表示,同时考虑了低阶效应(即双向交互作用)。当发现三因素交互作用具有预期方向时,假设得到支持。研究的因变量是工作满意度、情绪耗竭和个人成就感。
本研究不支持 DCS 模型的缓冲和激活假设。虽然不是预期的方向,但在情绪耗竭和个人成就感方面发现了三因素交互作用。此外,在工作满意度和情绪耗竭方面发现了双向交互作用。决策自主权被发现缓冲了工作需求的不利影响,并激活了医护人员。在决策自主权较低的情况下,主管支持被发现缓冲了工作需求对情绪耗竭的不利影响。最后,同事支持在高压力情况下对个人成就感产生了不利影响。
研究结果表明,决策自主权尤其使养老院的医护人员不易受到高工作需求的不利影响,并促进了工作的积极后果。