Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Technical University of Dortmund, Ardeystr. 67, 44139 Dortmund, Germany.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2011 Mar;48(3):307-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.04.003. Epub 2010 May 15.
According to the influential Job Demands-Control (JD-C) model developed by Karasek (1979; Karasek and Theorell, 1990), job strain is expected to result from high job demands and low job control as well as an interaction between both job characteristics. Previous research, however, has found such an interaction only rarely or inconsistently.It has been suggested that the conceptualization of the control variable (formerly referred to as decision latitude) may be particularly responsible for the lack of supportive findings.
The present study aimed at clarifying this issue by contrasting a focused measure of control with a traditional measure of decision latitude in their relations to job strain of health care workers. The measure of decision latitude encompassed a wide range of job characteristics including control, task variety, and learning opportunities.
A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted with job satisfaction, psychosomatic complaints and emotional exhaustion as criterion measures of job strain.
A supra-regional organization for residential elderly care with 11 nursing homes located in a federal state in Germany.
Questionnaires were distributed to the whole nursing staff, of which 379 filled in the questionnaire during normal working hours (68% participation rate).
In addition to confirmatory factor analyses, descriptive statistics, and bivariate correlations, hierarchical multiple regression analyses were performed for testing the corresponding interaction effects.
Findings confirmed the assumption that the focused measure of control and the traditional measure of decision latitude represent distinct, yet correlated factors. Furthermore, findings revealed a significant interaction effect between job demands and control on all outcomes considered. By way of contrast, there was no equivalent interaction effect between job demands and decision latitude. In line with the JD-C model, the adverse influence of increasing demands on job satisfaction, psychosomatic complaints and emotional exhaustion were reduced with increasing job control.
Extending the opportunities of health care workers to control work scheduling and the way of performing given tasks can make them less vulnerable against the adverse effects of high job demands.
根据 Karasek(1979 年;Karasek 和 Theorell,1990 年)提出的有影响力的工作要求-控制(JD-C)模型,工作压力预计将源自高工作要求和低工作控制以及两者之间的相互作用。然而,之前的研究很少或不一致地发现了这种相互作用。有人认为,控制变量(以前称为决策幅度)的概念化可能是导致缺乏支持性发现的特别原因。
本研究旨在通过对比医疗保健工作者的工作压力与工作控制的集中测量和传统决策幅度测量之间的关系来澄清这一问题。决策幅度的衡量标准包括控制、任务多样性和学习机会等广泛的工作特征。
采用横断面问卷调查,以工作满意度、心身症状和情绪疲惫作为工作压力的标准衡量标准。
德国一个联邦州的一个拥有 11 家养老院的住宅老年人护理的超区域组织。
向全体护理人员发放问卷,其中 379 人在正常工作时间填写问卷(参与率 68%)。
除了验证性因素分析、描述性统计和双变量相关性外,还进行了分层多元回归分析,以检验相应的交互效应。
研究结果证实了这样一种假设,即集中的控制测量和传统的决策幅度测量代表了不同但相关的因素。此外,研究结果显示,在所有考虑的结果中,工作需求和控制之间存在显著的交互效应。相比之下,工作需求和决策幅度之间没有等效的交互效应。与 JD-C 模型一致,增加工作控制可以减少增加的工作需求对工作满意度、心身症状和情绪疲惫的不利影响。
扩大医疗保健工作者控制工作安排和执行给定任务的方式的机会,可以使他们减少对高工作需求的不利影响的脆弱性。