Ruuska Piritta S, Hautala Arto J, Kiviniemi Antti M, Mäkikallio Timo H, Tulppo Mikko P
Department of Exercise and Medical Physiology Verve, Oulu, Finland.
Front Physiol. 2012 Mar 12;3:51. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2012.00051. eCollection 2012.
Individual responses to aerobic training vary from almost none to a 40% increase in aerobic fitness in healthy subjects. We hypothesized that the baseline self-rated mental stress may influence to the training response.
The study population included 44 healthy sedentary subjects (22 women) and 14 controls. The laboratory controlled training period was 2 weeks, including five sessions a week at an intensity of 75% of the maximum heart rate for 40 min/session. Self-rated mental stress was assessed by inquiry prior to the training period from 1 (low psychological resources and a lot of stressors in my life) to 10 (high psychological resources and no stressors in my life), respectively.
Mean peak oxygen uptake [Formula: see text] increased from 34 ± 7 to 37 ± 7 ml kg(-1) min(-1) in training group (p < 0.001) and did not change in control group (from 34 ± 7 to 34 ± 7 ml kg(-1) min(-1)). Among the training group, the self-rated stress at the baseline condition correlated with the change in fitness after training intervention, e.g., with the change in maximal power (r = 0.45, p = 0.002, W/kg) and with the change in [Formula: see text] (r = 0.32, p = 0.039, ml kg(-1) min(-1)). The self-rated stress at the baseline correlated with the change in fitness in both female and male, e.g., r = 0.44, p = 0.039 and r = 0.43, p = 0.045 for ΔW/kg in female and male, respectively.
As a novel finding the baseline self-rated mental stress is associated with the individual training response among healthy females and males after highly controlled aerobic training intervention. The changes in fitness were very low or absent in the subjects who experience their psychological resources low and a lot of stressors in their life at the beginning of aerobic training intervention.
健康受试者对有氧训练的个体反应差异很大,从几乎没有变化到有氧适能提高40%。我们假设基线自评心理压力可能会影响训练反应。
研究人群包括44名久坐不动的健康受试者(22名女性)和14名对照者。实验室控制的训练期为2周,包括每周5次训练,每次训练强度为最大心率的75%,持续40分钟。在训练期之前,通过询问来评估自评心理压力,范围从1(心理资源少且生活中有很多压力源)到10(心理资源多且生活中没有压力源)。
训练组的平均峰值摄氧量[公式:见正文]从34±7增加到37±7毫升·千克⁻¹·分钟⁻¹(p<0.001),而对照组没有变化(从34±7到34±7毫升·千克⁻¹·分钟⁻¹)。在训练组中,基线状态下的自评压力与训练干预后的体能变化相关,例如与最大功率变化(r=0.45,p=0.002,瓦/千克)和[公式:见正文]变化(r=0.32,p=0.039,毫升·千克⁻¹·分钟⁻¹)相关。基线自评压力与女性和男性的体能变化均相关,例如,女性和男性的Δ瓦/千克的r分别为0.44,p=0.039和0.43,p=0.045。
作为一项新发现,在经过高度控制的有氧训练干预后,基线自评心理压力与健康女性和男性的个体训练反应相关。在有氧训练干预开始时,心理资源少且生活中有很多压力源的受试者体能变化非常小或没有变化。