Suppr超能文献

颈部疼痛的患者教育

Patient education for neck pain.

作者信息

Gross Anita, Forget Mario, St George Kerry, Fraser Michelle M H, Graham Nadine, Perry Lenora, Burnie Stephen J, Goldsmith Charles H, Haines Ted, Brunarski David

机构信息

School of Rehabilitation Science&Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;2012(3):CD005106. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005106.pub4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Neck disorders are common, disabling, and costly. The effectiveness of patient education strategies is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the short- to long-term effects of therapeutic patient education (TPE) strategies on pain, function, disability, quality of life, global perceived effect, patient satisfaction, knowledge transfer, or behaviour change in adults with neck pain associated with whiplash or non-specific and specific mechanical neck pain with or without radiculopathy or cervicogenic headache.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched computerised bibliographic databases (inception to 11 July 2010).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials (RCT) investigating the effectiveness of TPE for acute to chronic neck pain.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Paired independent review authors conducted selection, data abstraction, and 'Risk of bias' assessment. We calculated risk ratio (RR) and standardised mean differences (SMD). Heterogeneity was assessed; no studies were pooled.

MAIN RESULTS

Of the 15 selected trials, three were rated low risk of bias. Three TPE themes emerged.Advice focusing on activation: There is moderate quality evidence (one trial, 348 participants) that an educational video of advice focusing on activation was more beneficial for acute whiplash-related pain when compared with no treatment at intermediate-term [RR 0.79 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.59 to 1.06)] but not long-term follow-up [0.89 (95% CI, 0.65 to 1.21)]. There is low quality evidence (one trial, 102 participants) that a whiplash pamphlet on advice focusing on activation is less beneficial for pain reduction, or no different in improving function and global perceived improvement from generic information given out in emergency care (control) for acute whiplash at short- or intermediate-term follow-up. Low to very low quality evidence (nine trials using diverse educational approaches) showed either no evidence of benefit or difference for varied outcomes. Advice focusing on pain & stress coping skills and workplace ergonomics: Very low quality evidence (three trials, 243 participants) favoured other treatment or showed no difference spanning numerous follow-up periods and disorder subtypes.  Low quality evidence (one trial, 192 participants) favoured specific exercise training for chronic neck pain at short-term follow-up.Self-care strategies: Very low quality evidence (one trial, 58 participants) indicated that self-care strategies did not relieve pain for acute to chronic neck pain at short-term follow-up.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: With the exception of one trial, this review has not shown effectiveness for educational interventions, including advice to activate, advice on stress-coping skills, workplace ergonomics and self-care strategies. Future research should be founded on sound adult learning theory and learning skill acquisition.

摘要

背景

颈部疾病常见、致残且代价高昂。患者教育策略的有效性尚不清楚。

目的

评估治疗性患者教育(TPE)策略对伴有挥鞭样损伤相关颈部疼痛或非特异性及特异性机械性颈部疼痛(伴或不伴神经根病或颈源性头痛)的成年人的疼痛、功能、残疾、生活质量、总体感知效果、患者满意度、知识传授或行为改变的短期至长期影响。

检索方法

我们检索了计算机化书目数据库(起始至2010年7月11日)。

入选标准

符合条件的研究为随机对照试验(RCT),调查TPE对急性至慢性颈部疼痛的有效性。

数据收集与分析

由两名独立的综述作者进行筛选、数据提取和“偏倚风险”评估。我们计算了风险比(RR)和标准化均数差(SMD)。评估了异质性;未合并研究。

主要结果

在15项入选试验中,3项被评为低偏倚风险。出现了3个TPE主题。侧重于激活的建议:有中等质量证据(1项试验,348名参与者)表明,与中期不治疗相比,侧重于激活的建议的教育视频对急性挥鞭样损伤相关疼痛更有益[RR 0.79(95%置信区间(CI)0.59至1.06)],但长期随访时并非如此[0.89(95%CI,0.65至1.21)]。有低质量证据(1项试验,102名参与者)表明,一份侧重于激活的挥鞭样损伤宣传册对减轻疼痛的益处较小,或在短期或中期随访时,在改善功能和总体感知改善方面与急诊护理中提供的一般信息(对照)没有差异。低至极低质量证据(9项使用不同教育方法的试验)显示,对于各种结果要么没有益处证据,要么没有差异。侧重于疼痛和压力应对技能以及工作场所工效学的建议:极低质量证据(3项试验,243名参与者)支持其他治疗或在多个随访期和疾病亚型中均无差异。低质量证据(1项试验,192名参与者)支持在短期随访时对慢性颈部疼痛进行特定运动训练。自我护理策略:极低质量证据(1项试验,58名参与者)表明,自我护理策略在短期随访时对急性至慢性颈部疼痛不能缓解疼痛。

作者结论

除1项试验外,本综述未显示教育干预措施有效,包括激活建议、压力应对技能建议、工作场所工效学和自我护理策略。未来的研究应以完善的成人学习理论和学习技能获取为基础。

相似文献

1
Patient education for neck pain.颈部疼痛的患者教育
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;2012(3):CD005106. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005106.pub4.
2
Patient education for neck pain with or without radiculopathy.针对伴有或不伴有神经根病的颈部疼痛的患者教育。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8(4):CD005106. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005106.pub2.
3
Patient education for neck pain with or without radiculopathy.针对伴有或不伴有神经根病的颈部疼痛的患者教育。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21(1):CD005106. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005106.pub3.
4
Exercises for mechanical neck disorders.机械性颈部疾病的锻炼方法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20(3):CD004250. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004250.pub3.
5
Acupuncture for neck disorders.针灸治疗颈部疾病。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 4(5):CD004870. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004870.pub4.
6
WITHDRAWN: Acupuncture for neck disorders.撤回:针灸治疗颈部疾病。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 17;11(11):CD004870. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004870.pub5.
7
Back Schools for chronic non-specific low back pain.慢性非特异性下腰痛的康复训练
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 3;8(8):CD011674. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011674.pub2.
8
A Cochrane review of patient education for neck pain.Cochrane关于颈部疼痛患者教育的综述。
Spine J. 2009 Oct;9(10):859-71. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.04.019. Epub 2009 Jul 12.
9
Yoga treatment for chronic non-specific low back pain.瑜伽治疗慢性非特异性下腰痛。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 12;1(1):CD010671. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010671.pub2.
10
Interventions to improve hearing aid use in adult auditory rehabilitation.改善成人听觉康复中助听器使用情况的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 18;2016(8):CD010342. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010342.pub3.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

10
Comparison of randomized treatments for late whiplash.随机治疗晚期颈痛的比较。
Neurology. 2010 Apr 13;74(15):1223-30. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181d8ffe0.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验