Areni Charles S, Burger Mitchell, Zlatevska Natalina
The University of Sydney, Australia.
Psychol Rep. 2011 Dec;109(3):723-33. doi: 10.2466/13.20.PR0.109.6.723-733.
A meta-analysis of 34 samples identified a small but reliable "Monday blues" effect (-.08 < or = d < or = -.06) in samples reporting current or real-time moods for each day of the week. However, the size of the effect in samples reporting recalled summaries of moods experienced over the course of a day varied depending on whether the sample involved university students or nonstudents. University students reporting recalled summaries of daily moods showed a large Monday blues effect (d = -.25), whereas married men who were not students reported smaller effects with greater variance (-.19 < or = d <or = -.01). The 34 samples reporting recalled summaries of moods experienced over multiple days produced effects ranging from -.25 to -1.28, but the variance among these samples was too great to estimate an aggregated statistic.
一项对34个样本的荟萃分析发现，在报告一周中每天当前或实时情绪的样本中，存在一种虽小但可靠的“周一忧郁”效应（-.08 ≤ d ≤ -.06）。然而，在报告一天中所经历情绪的回忆性总结的样本中，效应大小因样本是大学生还是非学生而有所不同。报告每日情绪回忆性总结的大学生表现出较大的“周一忧郁”效应（d = -.25），而未上学的已婚男性报告的效应较小且方差较大（-.19 ≤ d ≤ -.01）。报告多天经历情绪回忆性总结的34个样本产生的效应范围为-.25至-1.28，但这些样本之间的方差太大，无法估计汇总统计量。
