• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

风险承受能力和投票行为的每周波动

Weekly Fluctuations in Risk Tolerance and Voting Behaviour.

作者信息

Sanders Jet G, Jenkins Rob

机构信息

University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2016 Jul 8;11(7):e0159017. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159017. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0159017
PMID:27392020
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4938543/
Abstract

Risk tolerance is fundamental to decision-making and behaviour. Here we show that individuals' tolerance of risk follows a weekly cycle. We observed this cycle directly in a behavioural experiment using the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (Lejuez et al., 2002; Study 1). We also observed it indirectly via voting intentions, gathered from 81,564 responses across 70 opinion polls ahead of the Scottish Independence Referendum of 2014 (Study 2) and 149,064 responses across 77 opinion polls ahead of the United Kingdom European Union membership referendum of 2016 (Study 3). In all three studies, risk-tolerance decreased from Monday to Thursday before returning to a higher level on Friday. This pattern is politically significant because UK elections and referendums are traditionally held on a Thursday-the lowest point for risk tolerance. In particular, it raises the possibility that voting outcomes in the UK could be systematically risk-averse. In line with our analysis, the actual proportion of Yes votes in the Scottish Independence Referendum was 4% lower than forecast. Taken together, our findings reveal that the seven-day weekly cycle may have unexpected consequences for human decision-making. They also suggest that the day on which a vote is held could determine its outcome.

摘要

风险承受能力是决策和行为的基础。我们在此表明,个体对风险的承受能力呈现出每周的周期性变化。我们通过使用气球模拟风险任务的行为实验直接观察到了这种周期(勒朱埃兹等人,2002年;研究1)。我们还通过投票意向间接观察到了这一周期,这些投票意向来自2014年苏格兰独立公投前70次民意调查中的81564份回应(研究2)以及2016年英国脱欧公投前77次民意调查中的149064份回应(研究3)。在所有这三项研究中,风险承受能力从周一到周四下降,然后在周五回升至较高水平。这种模式具有政治意义,因为英国的选举和公投传统上在周四举行——这是风险承受能力的最低点。特别是,这增加了英国投票结果可能系统性地规避风险的可能性。与我们的分析一致,苏格兰独立公投中实际的“赞成”票数比例比预测低4%。综合来看,我们的研究结果表明,每周七天的周期可能会对人类决策产生意想不到的影响。它们还表明,投票举行的日期可能会决定投票结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9115/4938543/06ee872a496f/pone.0159017.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9115/4938543/6ebeef7254ba/pone.0159017.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9115/4938543/06ee872a496f/pone.0159017.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9115/4938543/6ebeef7254ba/pone.0159017.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9115/4938543/06ee872a496f/pone.0159017.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Weekly Fluctuations in Risk Tolerance and Voting Behaviour.风险承受能力和投票行为的每周波动
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 8;11(7):e0159017. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159017. eCollection 2016.
2
To Brexit or not to Brexit: The roles of Islamophobia, conspiracist beliefs, and integrated threat in voting intentions for the United Kingdom European Union membership referendum.脱欧还是留欧:在英国欧盟公投中,对伊斯兰教的恐惧、阴谋论信仰和综合威胁对投票意向的作用。
Br J Psychol. 2018 Feb;109(1):156-179. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12252. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
3
Cognitive ability and voting behaviour in the 2016 UK referendum on European Union membership.2016 年英国脱欧公投中的认知能力与投票行为。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 22;18(11):e0289312. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289312. eCollection 2023.
4
Eye Movements Predict Large-Scale Voting Decisions.眼球运动可预测大规模投票决策。
Psychol Sci. 2021 Jun;32(6):836-848. doi: 10.1177/0956797621991142. Epub 2021 May 25.
5
Explaining voting in the UK's 2016 EU referendum: Values, attitudes to immigration, European identity and political trust.解读英国2016年脱欧公投中的投票行为:价值观、对移民的态度、欧洲身份认同与政治信任
Soc Sci Res. 2020 Nov;92:102476. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2020.102476. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
6
Examining the role of positive and negative intergroup contact and anti-immigrant prejudice in Brexit.考察正向和负向的群体间接触以及反移民偏见在英国脱欧中的作用。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2017 Dec;56(4):799-808. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12203. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
7
Brain indices of disagreement with one's social values predict EU referendum voting behavior.与个人社会价值观不一致的大脑指数预测了欧盟公投投票行为。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017 Nov 1;12(11):1758-1765. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsx105.
8
Using the SIRDE model of social change to examine the vote of Scottish teenagers in the 2014 independence referendum.利用社会变革的 SIRDE 模型来考察苏格兰青少年在 2014 年独立公投中的投票情况。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2017 Sep;56(3):455-474. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12186. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
9
Single-Target Implicit Association Tests (ST-IAT) Predict Voting Behavior of Decided and Undecided Voters in Swiss Referendums.单目标内隐联想测验(ST-IAT)可预测瑞士公投中已决定和未决定选民的投票行为。
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 12;11(10):e0163872. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163872. eCollection 2016.
10
The political gender gap: gender bias in facial inferences that predict voting behavior.政治性别差距:预测投票行为的面部推断中的性别偏见。
PLoS One. 2008;3(10):e3666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003666. Epub 2008 Oct 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Penumbral thoughts: Contents of consciousness upon waking.半影思维:醒来时的意识内容。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 14;18(12):e0289654. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289654. eCollection 2023.
2
Weakened weekdays: lockdown disrupts the weekly cycle of risk tolerance.脆弱的工作日:封锁打乱了风险承受能力的每周周期。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 30;13(1):21147. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48395-9.
3
The day-of-week (DOW) effect on liberalism-conservatism: Evidence from a large-scale online survey in China.一周中的日期对自由主义-保守主义的影响:来自中国大规模在线调查的证据。

本文引用的文献

1
Mental Representations of Weekdays.工作日的心理表征
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 19;10(8):e0134555. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134555. eCollection 2015.
2
Evidence of weekly cyclicity in mood and functional impairment in those with a bipolar disorder.双相情感障碍患者情绪和功能障碍的每周周期性变化的证据。
Psychiatry Res. 2014 Aug 30;218(3):290-4. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.04.047. Epub 2014 May 9.
3
Decisions among the undecided: implicit attitudes predict future voting behavior of undecided voters.犹豫不决者的抉择:内隐态度预测未决选民未来的投票行为。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 14;13:1074334. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1074334. eCollection 2022.
4
A weekday intervention to reduce missed appointments.工作日干预以减少预约失约。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 29;17(9):e0274670. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274670. eCollection 2022.
5
The day-of-invitation effect on participation in web-based studies.邀请当日对参与基于网络研究的影响。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Aug;54(4):1841-1853. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01716-0. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
6
Heterogeneity in Risk-Taking During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence From the UK Lockdown.新冠疫情期间冒险行为的异质性:来自英国封锁措施的证据
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 1;12:643653. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643653. eCollection 2021.
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 29;9(1):e85680. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085680. eCollection 2014.
4
Weekday affects attendance rate for medical appointments: large-scale data analysis and implications.工作日影响医疗预约的出勤率:大规模数据分析及意义。
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51365. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051365. Epub 2012 Dec 13.
5
Do implicit attitudes predict actual voting behavior particularly for undecided voters?内隐态度是否能预测实际投票行为,特别是对那些犹豫不决的选民?
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e44130. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044130. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
6
Factors affecting the extent of Monday blues: evidence from a meta-analysis.影响周一忧郁程度的因素:一项荟萃分析的证据
Psychol Rep. 2011 Dec;109(3):723-33. doi: 10.2466/13.20.PR0.109.6.723-733.
7
The influence of discrete emotions on judgement and decision-making: a meta-analytic review.离散情绪对判断和决策的影响:元分析综述。
Cogn Emot. 2011 Dec;25(8):1393-422. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2010.550751. Epub 2011 May 24.
8
Propensity for risk taking and trait impulsivity in the Iowa Gambling Task.爱荷华赌博任务中的冒险倾向与特质冲动性
Pers Individ Dif. 2011 Apr 1;50(4):492-495. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.11.013.
9
Compassionate liberals and polite conservatives: associations of agreeableness with political ideology and moral values.富有同情心的自由派和彬彬有礼的保守派:宜人性与政治意识形态和道德价值观的关联。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010 May;36(5):655-64. doi: 10.1177/0146167210366854. Epub 2010 Apr 6.
10
Are needs to manage uncertainty and threat associated with political conservatism or ideological extremity?是否需要应对与政治保守主义或意识形态极端主义相关的不确定性和威胁?
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2007 Jul;33(7):989-1007. doi: 10.1177/0146167207301028.