Ellis David A, Wiseman Richard, Jenkins Rob
School of Psychology, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, United Kingdom.
School of Psychology, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 19;10(8):e0134555. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134555. eCollection 2015.
Keeping social appointments involves keeping track of what day it is. In practice, mismatches between apparent day and actual day are common. For example, a person might think the current day is Wednesday when in fact it is Thursday. Here we show that such mismatches are highly systematic, and can be traced to specific properties of their mental representations. In Study 1, mismatches between apparent day and actual day occurred more frequently on midweek days (Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday) than on other days, and were mainly due to intrusions from immediately neighboring days. In Study 2, reaction times to report the current day were fastest on Monday and Friday, and slowest midweek. In Study 3, participants generated fewer semantic associations for "Tuesday", "Wednesday" and "Thursday" than for other weekday names. Similarly, Google searches found fewer occurrences of midweek days in webpages and books. Analysis of affective norms revealed that participants' associations were strongly negative for Monday, strongly positive for Friday, and graded over the intervening days. Midweek days are confusable because their mental representations are sparse and similar. Mondays and Fridays are less confusable because their mental representations are rich and distinctive, forming two extremes along a continuum of change.
遵守社交约定需要记住日期。实际上,表面日期与实际日期不符的情况很常见。例如,一个人可能认为当天是周三,而实际上是周四。我们在此表明,这种不符情况具有高度系统性,并且可以追溯到其心理表征的特定属性。在研究1中,表面日期与实际日期不符的情况在工作日(周二、周三和周四)比在其他日子更频繁出现,并且主要是由于紧邻日期的干扰。在研究2中,报告当天的反应时间在周一和周五最快,在工作日中间时段最慢。在研究3中,参与者为“周二”“周三”和“周四”生成的语义联想比为其他工作日名称生成的少。同样,谷歌搜索发现网页和书籍中工作日中间时段的出现频率较低。情感规范分析表明,参与者对周一的联想强烈为负,对周五的联想强烈为正,而在中间的日子则呈渐变。工作日中间时段容易混淆,因为它们的心理表征稀疏且相似。周一和周五不太容易混淆,因为它们的心理表征丰富且独特,在一个连续变化的范围内形成两个极端。