• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜减重手术后的并发症和结果:LAGB 与 LRYGB 比较。

Complications and outcome after laparoscopic bariatric surgery: LAGB versus LRYGB.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Emile Mayrisch (CHEM), Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012 Dec;397(8):1235-41. doi: 10.1007/s00423-012-0945-5. Epub 2012 Mar 20.

DOI:10.1007/s00423-012-0945-5
PMID:22430299
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Unsatisfactory patient compliance and unfavorable results of weight loss let centers prefer the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) as a combined restrictive and malabsorptive procedure. The aim of this study was to evaluate results of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) versus laparoscopic RYGB.

SETTING

The study was conducted at Centre Hospitalier Emil Mayrisch Clinic for specialized care (n = 618 beds) in Luxembourg (South).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Of 620 procedures, 204 patients had LAGB and 416 LRYGB. Short-term (t(1), 6 months to 2 years), middle-term (t(2), 2 to 5 years), and long-term follow-up (t(3), >5 years) were performed, including weight loss evolution, Bariatric Analysis, and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS).

RESULTS

Percent EBWL mean values for LAGB vs. LRYGB were at t(1) 64.3 vs. 79.5, p = 0.01; at t(2) 49.4 vs. 91, p < 0.0001; and at t(3) 52.6 vs. 79.9, p < 0.0001. The BAROS mean values were at t(1) 3.81 vs. 4.00, p = 0.183; at t(2) 3.57 vs. 4.12, p < 0.001; and at t(3) 3.71 vs. 4.04, p = 0.02. Major complication rate (<30 days) was similar (p = 0.601). Long-term (>30 days) complications were more common after LAGB (14.3 versus 3.6%, p < 0.001). Fifty patients (25%) required a second and 36 patients (18%) a third operation (LRYGB).

CONCLUSION

The significant difference in %EBWL and BAROS and late adverse events with high re-operation rates in LAGB made the LRYGB more attractive.

摘要

背景与目的

由于患者依从性差和减肥效果不理想,中心更倾向于选择 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(RYGB)作为一种联合限制和吸收不良的手术。本研究旨在评估腹腔镜可调胃束带术(LAGB)与腹腔镜 RYGB 的结果。

地点

本研究在卢森堡(南部)的 Emil Mayrisch 临床中心专科医院(有 618 张病床)进行。

材料和方法

在 620 例手术中,204 例患者接受了 LAGB,416 例患者接受了 LRYGB。进行了短期(t(1),6 个月至 2 年)、中期(t(2),2 至 5 年)和长期随访(t(3),>5 年),包括体重减轻演变、减肥分析和报告结果系统(BAROS)。

结果

LAGB 与 LRYGB 的平均百分比 EBWL 值在 t(1)时分别为 64.3%和 79.5%,p=0.01;在 t(2)时分别为 49.4%和 91%,p<0.0001;在 t(3)时分别为 52.6%和 79.9%,p<0.0001。BAROS 的平均数值在 t(1)时分别为 3.81 和 4.00,p=0.183;在 t(2)时分别为 3.57 和 4.12,p<0.001;在 t(3)时分别为 3.71 和 4.04,p=0.02。主要并发症发生率(<30 天)相似(p=0.601)。长期(>30 天)并发症在 LAGB 后更为常见(14.3%比 3.6%,p<0.001)。50 例患者(25%)需要进行第二次手术,36 例患者(18%)需要进行第三次手术(LRYGB)。

结论

LAGB 在 %EBWL 和 BAROS 方面的显著差异以及晚期不良事件发生率较高导致再次手术率较高,使得 LRYGB 更具吸引力。

相似文献

1
Complications and outcome after laparoscopic bariatric surgery: LAGB versus LRYGB.腹腔镜减重手术后的并发症和结果:LAGB 与 LRYGB 比较。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012 Dec;397(8):1235-41. doi: 10.1007/s00423-012-0945-5. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
2
Weight Loss Failure and Reoperation After Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding and Gastric Bypass: a Case-Matched Cohort Study.腹腔镜可调节胃束带术和胃旁路术后体重减轻失败及再次手术:一项病例匹配队列研究。
Obes Surg. 2017 Nov;27(11):2885-2889. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2691-9.
3
Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 5-year results of a prospective randomized trial.腹腔镜可调节胃束带术与Roux-en-Y胃旁路术:一项前瞻性随机试验的5年结果
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007 Mar-Apr;3(2):127-32; discussion 132-3. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2006.12.005. Epub 2007 Feb 27.
4
Laparoscopic adjustable gastric band removal and outcome of subsequent revisional bariatric procedures: A retrospective review of 214 consecutive patients.腹腔镜可调节胃束带移除术及后续减重手术修正的结果:对214例连续患者的回顾性研究
Int J Surg. 2016 Mar;27:133-137. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.01.068. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
5
Procedure-related morbidity in bariatric surgery: a retrospective short- and mid-term follow-up of a single institution of the American College of Surgeons Bariatric Surgery Centers of Excellence.减重手术相关发病率:美国外科医师学会减重手术卓越中心单机构的回顾性短期和中期随访。
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Oct;217(4):614-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.05.013. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
6
Conversion of Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding to Gastric Bypass: a Comparison to Primary Gastric Bypass.腹腔镜可调节胃束带转胃旁路术:与初次胃旁路术的比较
Obes Surg. 2018 Jun;28(6):1519-1525. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-3047-1.
7
Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding versus laparoscopic gastric bypass for morbid obesity: a single-institution comparison study of early results.腹腔镜可调节胃束带术与腹腔镜胃旁路术治疗病态肥胖症:单机构早期结果比较研究
J Gastrointest Surg. 2005 Jan;9(1):30-9; discussion 40-1. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2004.09.043.
8
Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in the United States.美国腹腔镜可调节胃束带术和腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术的长期结果。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Jul;26(7):1909-19. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2125-z. Epub 2012 Jan 5.
9
Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 10-year results of a prospective, randomized trial.腹腔镜可调节胃束带术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术:一项前瞻性随机试验的 10 年结果。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013 May-Jun;9(3):405-13. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2012.11.011. Epub 2013 Jan 31.
10
Conversion of failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass?腹腔镜可调胃束带术失败后的转换:胃袖状切除术还是 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术?
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013 Nov-Dec;9(6):901-7. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2013.04.003. Epub 2013 Apr 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Cholelithiasis, Gut Microbiota and Bile Acids after Bariatric Surgery-Can Cholelithiasis Be Prevented by Modulating the Microbiota? A Literature Review.胆石病、肠道微生物群和减肥手术后的胆汁酸-通过调节微生物群可以预防胆石病吗?文献综述。
Nutrients. 2024 Aug 3;16(15):2551. doi: 10.3390/nu16152551.
2
Long-Term Manometric Impact of the Adjustable Gastric Band on Esophageal Motility: a Prospective Case-Control Study.可调节胃束带对食管动力的长期测压影响:一项前瞻性病例对照研究。
Obes Surg. 2021 Jul;31(7):3333-3336. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05361-6. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
3
Clinical Outcomes of Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass After Failed Adjustable Gastric Banding.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of poor outcomes after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.腹腔镜可调胃束带术不良结局分析。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Jan;25(1):41-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1126-7. Epub 2010 Jun 30.
2
A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic gastric bypass versus laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for the treatment of morbid obesity: outcomes, quality of life, and costs.腹腔镜胃旁路术与腹腔镜可调胃束带术治疗病态肥胖的前瞻性随机试验:结果、生活质量和成本。
Ann Surg. 2009 Oct;250(4):631-41. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b92480.
3
Bariatric surgery: low mortality at a high-volume center.
胃旁路术与袖状胃切除术治疗失败可调节胃束带术后的临床疗效比较
Obes Surg. 2019 Oct;29(10):3252-3263. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03988-0.
4
Revision Procedures After Failed Adjustable Gastric Banding: Comparison of Efficacy and Safety.可调节胃束带术失败后的修复手术:疗效与安全性比较
Obes Surg. 2017 Nov;27(11):2861-2867. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2716-4.
5
A comparison of outcomes of bariatric surgery in patient greater than 70 with 18 month of follow up.对70岁以上患者进行减肥手术并随访18个月后的结果比较。
Springerplus. 2016 Oct 7;5(1):1740. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-3392-x. eCollection 2016.
6
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: comparison of primary versus revisional bypass by using the BAROS score.腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术治疗病态肥胖:应用BAROS评分比较初次手术与翻修手术的疗效
Obes Surg. 2015 May;25(5):812-7. doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1473-x.
7
Conversion of failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is safe as a single-step procedure.将失败的腹腔镜可调节胃束带术转换为Roux-en-Y胃旁路术作为单步手术是安全的。
Surg Endosc. 2015 Aug;29(8):2217-23. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3928-5. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
8
Twenty-first century weight loss: banding versus bypass.21世纪的减肥方法:束带手术与胃旁路手术对比
Surg Endosc. 2015 Apr;29(4):947-54. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3758-5. Epub 2014 Aug 9.
9
Gender influence on long-term weight loss after three bariatric procedures: gastric banding is less effective in males in a retrospective analysis.三种减肥手术后性别对长期体重减轻的影响:一项回顾性分析显示,胃束带手术对男性的效果较差。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Aug;28(8):2406-11. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3489-7. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
10
Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding connecting tube causing small bowel obstruction and perforation.腹腔镜可调节胃束带连接管导致小肠梗阻和穿孔。
Case Rep Surg. 2013;2013:296037. doi: 10.1155/2013/296037. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
减重手术:高容量中心的低死亡率
Obes Surg. 2008 Jun;18(6):660-7. doi: 10.1007/s11695-007-9357-y. Epub 2008 Apr 3.
4
Inter-disciplinary European guidelines on surgery of severe obesity.欧洲严重肥胖症手术跨学科指南
Int J Obes (Lond). 2007 Apr;31(4):569-77. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803560. Epub 2007 Feb 27.
5
Laparoscopic gastric bypass is superior to adjustable gastric band in super morbidly obese patients: A prospective, comparative analysis.腹腔镜胃旁路手术在超级肥胖患者中优于可调节胃束带术:一项前瞻性比较分析。
Arch Surg. 2006 Jul;141(7):683-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.141.7.683.
6
Laparoscopic adjustable gastric band versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: ends justify the means?腹腔镜可调节胃束带术与腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术:只要目的正当,可以不择手段吗?
Surg Endosc. 2006 Jun;20(6):934-41. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0270-y. Epub 2006 May 11.
7
Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in the treatment of obesity: a systematic literature review.腹腔镜可调节胃束带术治疗肥胖症:一项系统文献综述
Surgery. 2004 Mar;135(3):326-51. doi: 10.1016/S0039-6060(03)00392-1.
8
Lap-band: outcomes and results.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2003 Aug;13(4):265-70. doi: 10.1089/109264203322333593.
9
Laparoscopic gastric bypass versus laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: a comparative study of 1,200 cases.腹腔镜胃旁路手术与腹腔镜可调节胃束带术:1200例病例的对比研究
J Am Coll Surg. 2003 Oct;197(4):536-44; discussion 544-5. doi: 10.1016/S1072-7515(03)00730-0.
10
Complications after laparoscopic gastric bypass: a review of 3464 cases.腹腔镜胃旁路术后并发症:3464例病例回顾
Arch Surg. 2003 Sep;138(9):957-61. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.138.9.957.