• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

养老院居民预防抑郁和焦虑的效果相互矛盾:一项实用随机对照试验。

Contradictory effects for prevention of depression and anxiety in residents in homes for the elderly: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of General Practice, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int Psychogeriatr. 2012 Aug;24(8):1242-51. doi: 10.1017/S1041610212000178. Epub 2012 Mar 22.

DOI:10.1017/S1041610212000178
PMID:22436082
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a stepped-care program to prevent the onset of depression and anxiety disorders in elderly people living in residential homes.

METHODS

A pragmatic randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare the intervention with usual care in 14 residential homes in the Netherlands. A total of 185 residents with a minimum score of 8 on the Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, who did not meet the diagnostic criteria for a depressive or anxiety disorder, and were not suffering from severe cognitive impairment, were recruited between April 2007 and December 2008. They were randomized to a stepped-care program (N = 93) or to usual care (N = 92). The stepped-care participants sequentially underwent watchful waiting, a self-help intervention, life review, and a consultation with the general practitioner. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of a major depressive disorder (MDD) or anxiety disorder during a period of one year according to the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview.

RESULTS

The intervention was not effective in reducing the incidence of the combined outcome of depression and anxiety (incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 0.50; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.23-1.12). However, the intervention was superior to usual care in reducing the risk of MDD incidence (IRR = 0.26; 95% CI = 0.12-0.80) contrary to anxiety incidence (IRR = 1.32; 95% CI = 0.48-3.62).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that the stepped-care program is effective in reducing the incidence of depression, but is not effective in preventing the onset of anxiety disorders in elderly people living in residential homes.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估一种阶梯式护理方案对预防居住在养老院的老年人抑郁和焦虑障碍发病的有效性。

方法

本研究采用实用随机对照试验,在荷兰的 14 家养老院中将干预组与常规护理进行比较。共有 185 名中心流行病学研究抑郁量表评分至少为 8 分、未达到抑郁或焦虑障碍诊断标准、且无严重认知障碍的居民入组,他们于 2007 年 4 月至 2008 年 12 月期间被随机分配至阶梯式护理方案组(n = 93)或常规护理组(n = 92)。阶梯式护理方案参与者依次接受观察等待、自助干预、生活回顾和全科医生咨询。主要结局指标为一年内发生重性抑郁障碍(MDD)或焦虑障碍的发生率,采用 Mini 国际神经精神访谈进行评估。

结果

干预组并不能降低抑郁和焦虑合并症的发生率(发病率比(IRR)= 0.50;95%置信区间(CI)= 0.23-1.12)。然而,与焦虑症发病率(IRR = 1.32;95% CI = 0.48-3.62)相比,干预组降低 MDD 发病率的风险(IRR = 0.26;95% CI = 0.12-0.80)更优。

结论

这些结果表明,阶梯式护理方案能有效降低居住在养老院的老年人抑郁的发病率,但对预防焦虑障碍的发病无效。

相似文献

1
Contradictory effects for prevention of depression and anxiety in residents in homes for the elderly: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.养老院居民预防抑郁和焦虑的效果相互矛盾:一项实用随机对照试验。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2012 Aug;24(8):1242-51. doi: 10.1017/S1041610212000178. Epub 2012 Mar 22.
2
Preventing depression in homes for older adults: are effects sustained over 2 years?预防老年人养老机构中的抑郁:效果能持续 2 年以上吗?
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2014 Feb;29(2):191-7. doi: 10.1002/gps.3989. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
3
Stepped-care prevention of anxiety and depression in late life: a randomized controlled trial.老年期焦虑和抑郁的分级护理预防:一项随机对照试验。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009 Mar;66(3):297-304. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2008.555.
4
The incidence of depression and its risk factors in Dutch nursing homes and residential care homes.荷兰养老院和护理院的抑郁发生率及其危险因素。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2012 Nov;20(11):932-42. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e31825d08ac.
5
Cost-effectiveness of a stepped care programme to prevent depression and anxiety in residents in homes for the older people: a randomised controlled trial.预防老年人护理院居民抑郁和焦虑的分级护理方案的成本效益:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2014 Feb;29(2):182-90. doi: 10.1002/gps.3987. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
6
Feasibility and effectiveness of activity-scheduling as a guided self-help intervention for the prevention of depression and anxiety in residents in homes for the elderly: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.活动安排作为一种有指导的自助干预措施预防养老院居民抑郁和焦虑的可行性和有效性:一项实用随机对照试验。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2011 Aug;23(6):969-78. doi: 10.1017/S1041610211000202. Epub 2011 Feb 22.
7
Prevention of anxiety and depression in the age group of 75 years and over: a randomised controlled trial testing the feasibility and effectiveness of a generic stepped care programme among elderly community residents at high risk of developing anxiety and depression versus usual care [ISRCTN26474556].预防75岁及以上人群的焦虑和抑郁:一项随机对照试验,测试针对有发展为焦虑和抑郁高风险的老年社区居民的通用分级护理计划与常规护理相比的可行性和有效性[国际标准随机对照试验编号:ISRCTN26474556]
BMC Public Health. 2006 Jul 18;6:186. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-186.
8
Effectiveness of a stepped-care intervention to prevent major depression in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and/or coronary heart disease and subthreshold depression: A pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial.一种逐步护理干预措施预防2型糖尿病和/或冠心病合并阈下抑郁患者发生重度抑郁症的有效性:一项实用整群随机对照试验
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 1;12(8):e0181023. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181023. eCollection 2017.
9
Watchful waiting for subthreshold depression and anxiety in visually impaired older adults.对视障老年人阈下抑郁和焦虑进行观察等待。
Qual Life Res. 2015 Dec;24(12):2885-93. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1032-5. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
10
Economic evaluation of stepped-care versus usual care for depression and anxiety in older adults with vision impairment: randomized controlled trial.针对视力受损老年人的抑郁症和焦虑症,阶梯式护理与常规护理的经济学评估:随机对照试验
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Aug 1;17(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1437-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Health, social care and technological interventions to improve functional ability of older adults living at home: An evidence and gap map.改善居家老年人功能能力的健康、社会护理及技术干预措施:一项证据与差距图谱
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 7;17(3):e1175. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1175. eCollection 2021 Sep.
2
What long-term care interventions have been published between 2010 and 2020? Results of a WHO scoping review identifying long-term care interventions for older people around the world.2010 年至 2020 年期间发表了哪些长期护理干预措施?一项针对全球老年人的长期护理干预措施的世界卫生组织范围界定审查的结果。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 31;12(1):e054492. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054492.
3
Cost-effectiveness of a stepped care program to prevent depression among primary care patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 and/or coronary heart disease and subthreshold depression in comparison with usual care.
二型糖尿病和/或冠心病合并亚临床抑郁的初级保健患者实施阶梯式护理预防抑郁的成本效益分析:与常规护理相比。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Aug 13;21(1):402. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03367-z.
4
The effect of peer group education on anxiety, stress, and depression in older adults living in nursing homes.同伴群体教育对住在养老院的老年人焦虑、压力和抑郁的影响。
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2021 May 17;26(3):252-257. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_40_20. eCollection 2021 May-Jun.
5
Setting Priorities to Inform Assessment of Care Homes' Readiness to Participate in Healthcare Innovation: A Systematic Mapping Review and Consensus Process.确定优先事项,以告知养老院参与医疗保健创新准备情况的评估:系统映射审查和共识过程。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 5;17(3):987. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030987.
6
Statistical design and analysis in trials of proportionate interventions: a systematic review.成比例干预试验中的统计设计与分析:一项系统综述
Trials. 2019 Feb 28;20(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3206-x.
7
Patients' and practice nurses' perceptions of depression in patients with type 2 diabetes and/or coronary heart disease screened for subthreshold depression.患者和执业护士对 2 型糖尿病和/或冠心病患者亚临床抑郁筛查的看法。
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Dec 23;19(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0870-y.
8
Evidence-based Non-pharmacologic Interventions for Managing Neuropsychiatric Symptoms and Mental Health Issues in Residents in Assisted Living.基于证据的非药物干预措施,用于管理辅助生活设施中居民的神经精神症状和心理健康问题。
Seniors Hous Care J. 2017;25(1):71-83.
9
Guideline-based stepped and collaborative care for patients with depression in a cluster-randomised trial.基于指南的阶梯式和协作式护理在一项集群随机试验中对抑郁症患者的效果。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 20;8(1):9389. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27470-6.
10
Effectiveness of Psychological and/or Educational Interventions in the Prevention of Anxiety: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Meta-regression.心理和/或教育干预措施在预防焦虑症方面的有效性:一项系统评价、荟萃分析和元回归分析
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Oct 1;74(10):1021-1029. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.2509.