• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

写作系列项目:一种支持卫生环境下社会工作临床医生传播实践知识的模式。

The Writing Series Project: a model for supporting social work clinicians in health settings to disseminate practice knowledge.

机构信息

School of Human Services and Social Work, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

Soc Work Health Care. 2012;51(3):246-70. doi: 10.1080/00981389.2011.619860.

DOI:10.1080/00981389.2011.619860
PMID:22443404
Abstract

Social work clinicians across health care settings are uniquely positioned to disseminate valuable practice experience, thereby contributing to knowledge development within their field of practice and across disciplines. Unfortunately, practitioners tend to shy away from writing and research, and are often reluctant to publicly disseminate their expertise through peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations. To better support health social workers in scholarly endeavors, we developed and implemented The Writing Series Project in southeast Queensland, Australia. This article reports on the development, programmatic challenges and practitioner feedback that offer insight into the benefits and pitfalls that we encountered.

摘要

在医疗保健环境中,社会工作临床医生处于独特的位置,可以传播有价值的实践经验,从而为他们的实践领域和跨学科领域的知识发展做出贡献。不幸的是,从业者往往回避写作和研究,并且通常不愿意通过同行评议的期刊和会议演讲来公开传播他们的专业知识。为了更好地支持健康社会工作者进行学术努力,我们在澳大利亚昆士兰州东南部开发并实施了《写作系列项目》。本文报告了该项目的发展、计划挑战和从业者反馈,这些内容提供了我们所遇到的好处和陷阱的深入了解。

相似文献

1
The Writing Series Project: a model for supporting social work clinicians in health settings to disseminate practice knowledge.写作系列项目:一种支持卫生环境下社会工作临床医生传播实践知识的模式。
Soc Work Health Care. 2012;51(3):246-70. doi: 10.1080/00981389.2011.619860.
2
The dissemination and utilization of research for promoting evidence-based practice.为促进循证实践而进行的研究传播与应用。
J Evid Based Soc Work. 2008;5(1-2):295-319. doi: 10.1300/J394v05n01_11.
3
Supporting evidence-based health care in crises: what information do humanitarian organizations need?支持危机中的循证医疗保健:人道主义组织需要哪些信息?
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2011 Mar;5(1):69-72. doi: 10.1001/dmp.2010.32.1026. Epub 2010 Oct 26.
4
Social work in health care: do practitioners' writings suggest an applied social science?医疗保健领域的社会工作:从业者的著作是否表明这是一门应用社会科学?
Soc Work Health Care. 1998;28(2):63-81. doi: 10.1300/J010v28n02_05.
5
Evidence-based practice in everyday clinical practice: strategies for change in a tertiary occupational therapy department.日常临床实践中的循证实践:三级职业治疗科室的变革策略
Aust Occup Ther J. 2008 Jun;55(2):79-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2007.00669.x.
6
Social work competencies in palliative and end-of-life care.姑息治疗和临终关怀中的社会工作能力。
J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care. 2005;1(1):87-120. doi: 10.1300/J457v01n01_06.
7
Dissemination 2.0: closing the gap between knowledge and practice with new media and marketing.传播 2.0:利用新媒体和营销手段缩小知识与实践之间的差距。
J Health Commun. 2011;16 Suppl 1:32-44. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2011.593608.
8
Evidence-based (informed) macro practice paradigm: integration of practice expertise and research.循证(明智)宏观实践范式:实践专业知识与研究的整合。
J Evid Based Soc Work. 2008;5(3-4):407-21. doi: 10.1080/15433710802083955.
9
Advancing the clinical perspective: a practice development project to develop the nurse practitioner role in an acute hospital trust.推进临床视角:一项在急性医院信托机构中发展执业护士角色的实践发展项目。
J Clin Nurs. 2005 Apr;14(4):444-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.01089.x.
10
Gender and personal breastfeeding experience of rural GP registrars in Australia--a qualitative study of their effect on breastfeeding attitudes and knowledge.澳大利亚农村全科医生注册实习生的性别与个人母乳喂养经历——关于其对母乳喂养态度和知识影响的定性研究
Rural Remote Health. 2007 Jul-Sep;7(3):737. Epub 2007 Jul 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes of a funding initiative to promote allied health research activity: a qualitative realist evaluation.促进联合健康研究活动的资助计划的结果:一项定性现实主义评估。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Jun 19;18(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00572-2.
2
Not enough time for research? Use of supported funding to promote allied health research activity.没有足够的时间进行研究?利用支持性资金促进联合健康研究活动。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2018 Jun 21;11:269-277. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S157034. eCollection 2018.
3
A cross sectional observational study of research activity of allied health teams: is there a link with self-reported success, motivators and barriers to undertaking research?
一项关于联合健康团队研究活动的横断面观察性研究:它与自我报告的研究成功、动机和障碍之间是否存在关联?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Feb 6;17(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-1996-7.