Manyonda I T, Shaw D E, Drife J O
Department of Obstetrics, Leicester Royal Infirmary, England.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1990;69(4):291-5. doi: 10.3109/00016349009036149.
We studied primigravid women in spontaneous labor at term and given epidural analgesia. Two hundred such women giving birth in 1983 were compared with similar groups who gave birth in 1985 and 1987 after the introduction of 'delayed pushing' into our labor ward protocol. Four hundred controls were obtained in 1983 and 1985 by selecting from the labor ward register the next normal primigravid woman in spontaneous labor without epidural analgesia. The assisted delivery rate was significantly higher in all three epidural groups than in the controls (p less than 0.001). Among epidural labors, there was no significant difference between 1983 and 1987 in the incidence of rotational or non-rotational forceps, or of cesarean section. In each epidural group, women who waited more than 60 min were less likely to experience a normal spontaneous delivery than were those who did not (p less than 0.001 in 1983; p = 0.006 in 1985 p = 0.035 in 1987). We conclude that to delay pushing beyond 60 min confers no benefit regarding mode of delivery.
我们研究了足月自然分娩并接受硬膜外镇痛的初产妇。将1983年分娩的200名此类产妇与在我们的分娩病房方案中引入“延迟用力”后于1985年和1987年分娩的类似产妇群体进行比较。1983年和1985年通过从分娩病房登记册中挑选下一位未接受硬膜外镇痛的自然分娩正常初产妇获得了400名对照。所有三个硬膜外组的助产率均显著高于对照组(p<0.001)。在硬膜外分娩中,1983年和1987年在旋转或非旋转产钳以及剖宫产的发生率方面没有显著差异。在每个硬膜外组中,等待超过60分钟的产妇比未等待的产妇更不容易经历正常自然分娩(1983年p<0.001;1985年p = 0.006;1987年p = 0.035)。我们得出结论,延迟用力超过60分钟在分娩方式方面没有益处。