1Animal Nutrition and Health Department, Scottish Agricultural College, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK.
Animal. 2007 Oct;1(9):1392-400. doi: 10.1017/S1751731107000730.
The use of medicinal plants for the prevention and treatment of gastro-intestinal parasitism has its origin in ethnoveterinary medicine. Although until recently the majority of the evidence on the antiparasitic activity of medicinal plants was anecdotal and lacked scientific validity, there is currently an increasing number of controlled experimental studies that aim to verify and quantify such plant activity. There are indeed a large number of plants whose anthelmintic activity has been demonstrated under controlled experimentation, either through feeding the whole plant or administering plant extracts to parasitised hosts. However, contrary to traditional expectation, there are also a great number of plants with purported antiparasitic properties, which have not been reproduced under experimental conditions. In this paper, we discuss the source of such inconsistencies between ethnoveterinary wisdom and scientific experimentation. We focus on the strengths and weaknesses of the existing methodologies used in the controlled studies to determine the activity of antiparasitic plants. We discuss issues like the seasonal and environmental variability of the plant composition, and how this can affect their antiparasitic properties and highlight the importance of identifying the mechanisms of action of such plants and the target parasite species. In addition to their antiparasitic properties, medicinal plants may also have anti-nutritional properties, which can affect animal performance and behaviour. For this reason, we emphasise the need for considering additional dimensions when evaluating medicinal plants. We also question whether using similar criteria as those used for the evaluation of anthelmintics is the way forward. We propose that a holistic approach is required to evaluate the potential of medicinal plants in parasite control and maximise their benefits on parasitised hosts.
药用植物在预防和治疗肠胃寄生虫病方面的应用起源于传统兽医医学。尽管直到最近,大多数关于药用植物抗寄生虫活性的证据都是传闻的,缺乏科学有效性,但目前越来越多的对照实验研究旨在验证和量化这种植物的活性。确实有大量的植物,其驱虫活性已经在对照实验中得到证实,无论是通过喂食整株植物还是给寄生虫宿主施用植物提取物。然而,与传统的预期相反,也有大量具有驱虫作用的植物在实验条件下没有得到重现。在本文中,我们讨论了这种传统兽医知识与科学实验之间不一致的原因。我们重点讨论了用于确定抗寄生虫植物活性的对照研究中现有方法的优缺点。我们讨论了植物成分的季节性和环境可变性等问题,以及这如何影响它们的驱虫特性,并强调了确定这些植物的作用机制和目标寄生虫物种的重要性。除了驱虫特性外,药用植物还可能具有抗营养特性,这会影响动物的性能和行为。因此,在评估药用植物时,我们强调需要考虑其他方面。我们还质疑是否可以采用与评估驱虫剂相同的标准来推进这一领域的发展。我们提出需要采用整体方法来评估药用植物在寄生虫控制中的潜力,并最大限度地发挥它们对寄生虫宿主的益处。