• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Guidance for evidence-informed policies about health systems: assessing how much confidence to place in the research evidence.卫生系统循证政策指南：评估对研究证据的信任程度。
PLoS Med. 2012;9(3):e1001187. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001187. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
2
Guidance for evidence-informed policies about health systems: rationale for and challenges of guidance development.卫生系统循证政策指南：制定指南的理由和挑战。
PLoS Med. 2012;9(3):e1001185. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001185. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
3
Guidance for evidence-informed policies about health systems: linking guidance development to policy development.卫生系统循证政策指南：将指南制定与政策制定联系起来。
PLoS Med. 2012;9(3):e1001186. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001186. Epub 2012 Mar 13.
4
Knowledge exchange in the Pacific: The TROPIC (Translational Research into Obesity Prevention Policies for Communities) project.太平洋地区的知识交流：TROPIC（社区肥胖预防政策转化研究）项目。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jul 25;12:552. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-552.
5
Assessing the implementation and influence of policies that support research and innovation systems for health: the cases of Mozambique, Senegal, and Tanzania.评估支持卫生研究与创新体系政策的实施情况及影响：莫桑比克、塞内加尔和坦桑尼亚的案例
Health Res Policy Syst. 2015 Apr 18;13:21. doi: 10.1186/s12961-015-0010-2.
6
Evidence-informed policy formulation and implementation: a comparative case study of two national policies for improving health and social care in Sweden.循证政策制定与实施：瑞典两项改善健康与社会护理国家政策的比较案例研究
Implement Sci. 2015 Dec 8;10:169. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0359-1.
7
Developing evidence briefs for policy: a qualitative case study comparing the process of using a guidance-contextualization workbook in Peru and Uganda.为政策制定开发证据摘要：秘鲁和乌干达使用指导-情境化工作簿的过程比较的定性案例研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Nov 21;17(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0488-0.
8
Lost in Translation: Piloting a Novel Framework to Assess the Challenges in Translating Scientific Uncertainty From Empirical Findings to WHO Policy Statements.迷失在翻译中：试用新框架评估从实证发现到世卫组织政策声明翻译科学不确定性面临的挑战。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Nov 1;6(11):649-660. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.28.
9
B'More Fit for Healthy Babies: Using Trauma-Informed Care Policies to Improve Maternal Health in Baltimore City.更适合孕育健康宝宝：运用创伤知情护理政策改善巴尔的摩市的孕产妇健康。
Womens Health Issues. 2017 Oct 17;27 Suppl 1:S38-S45. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2017.09.002.
10
Embedding implementation research to enhance health policy and systems: a multi-country analysis from ten settings in Latin America and the Caribbean.嵌入实施研究以加强卫生政策和体系：拉丁美洲和加勒比十个国家的多国分析。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Oct 15;17(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0484-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Tools for assessing the methodological limitations of a QES-a short note.评估定量系统评价方法学局限性的工具——短评。
Syst Rev. 2024 Apr 6;13(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02511-6.
2
Developing technical support and strategic dialogue at the country level to achieve Primary Health Care-based health systems beyond the COVID-19 era.在国家层面上制定技术支持和战略对话，以在 COVID-19 时代之外实现基于初级卫生保健的卫生系统。
Front Public Health. 2023 Apr 11;11:1102325. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1102325. eCollection 2023.
3
Facilitators, barriers and strategies for health-system guidance implementation: a critical interpretive synthesis protocol.卫生系统指南实施的促进因素、障碍和策略：批判性综合解读方案。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Sep 29;20(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00908-0.
4
Further evidence needed to change policy for the safe and effective radical cure of vivax malaria: Insights from the 2019 annual APMEN Vivax Working Group meeting.改变间日疟安全有效根治政策所需的进一步证据：来自2019年APMEN间日疟工作组年度会议的见解
Asia Pac Policy Stud. 2021 May;8(2):208-242. doi: 10.1002/app5.314. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
5
Promoting the use of evidence in health policymaking in the ECOWAS region: the development and contextualization of an evidence-based policymaking guidance.促进在西非经共体区域的卫生决策中使用证据：制定和调整循证决策指南。
Global Health. 2020 Aug 6;16(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12992-020-00605-z.
6
Modelling for policy: The five principles of the Neglected Tropical Diseases Modelling Consortium.政策建模：被忽视热带病建模联盟的五项原则
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Apr 9;14(4):e0008033. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008033. eCollection 2020 Apr.
7
Is evidence-informed urban health planning a myth or reality? Lessons from a qualitative assessment in three Asian cities.循证的城市卫生规划：是神话还是现实？来自三个亚洲城市的定性评估的经验教训。
Health Policy Plan. 2019 Dec 1;34(10):773-783. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czz097.
8
The hepatitis C infection in Iran: a policy analysis of agenda-setting using Kingdon's multiple streams framework.伊朗的丙型肝炎感染：运用金登的多源流框架进行议程设置的政策分析。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Mar 27;17(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0436-z.
9
Considerations of complexity in rating certainty of evidence in systematic reviews: a primer on using the GRADE approach in global health.系统评价中证据确定性评级的复杂性考量：全球卫生领域使用GRADE方法入门指南
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Jan 25;4(Suppl 1):e000848. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000848. eCollection 2019.
10
Validity and usability testing of a health systems guidance appraisal tool, the AGREE-HS.健康系统指导评估工具（AGREE-HS）的有效性和可用性测试。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Jun 20;16(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0334-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Guidance for evidence-informed policies about health systems: linking guidance development to policy development.卫生系统循证政策指南：将指南制定与政策制定联系起来。
PLoS Med. 2012;9(3):e1001186. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001186. Epub 2012 Mar 13.
2
Guidance for evidence-informed policies about health systems: rationale for and challenges of guidance development.卫生系统循证政策指南：制定指南的理由和挑战。
PLoS Med. 2012;9(3):e1001185. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001185. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
3
Building the field of health policy and systems research: an agenda for action.构建卫生政策和体系研究领域：行动议程。
PLoS Med. 2011 Aug;8(8):e1001081. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001081. Epub 2011 Aug 30.
4
Still too little qualitative research to shed light on results from reviews of effectiveness trials: a case study of a Cochrane review on the use of lay health workers.定性研究仍然太少，无法阐明有效性试验综述的结果：以 Cochrane 关于使用非专业卫生工作者的综述为例。
Implement Sci. 2011 May 27;6:53. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-53.
5
A worked example of "best fit" framework synthesis: a systematic review of views concerning the taking of some potential chemopreventive agents.“最佳拟合”框架综合的实例研究：关于服用某些潜在化学预防剂的观点的系统综述。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Mar 16;11:29. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-29.
6
Evidence summaries tailored to health policy-makers in low- and middle-income countries.针对中低收入国家卫生决策者的证据摘要。
Bull World Health Organ. 2011 Jan 1;89(1):54-61. doi: 10.2471/BLT.10.075481. Epub 2010 Nov 24.
7
GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables.GRADE 指南：1. 简介-GRADE 证据概况和发现摘要表。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):383-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026. Epub 2010 Dec 31.
8
GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.GRADE 指南：《临床流行病学杂志》的一系列新文章。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):380-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.011. Epub 2010 Dec 24.
9
A realist synthesis of randomised control trials involving use of community health workers for delivering child health interventions in low and middle income countries.随机对照试验的现实主义综合分析，涉及在中低收入国家使用社区卫生工作者提供儿童健康干预措施。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Oct 13;10:286. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-286.
10
Taking healthcare interventions from trial to practice.将医疗保健干预措施从试验转化为实际应用。
BMJ. 2010 Aug 13;341:c3852. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c3852.

卫生系统循证政策指南：评估对研究证据的信任程度。

Guidance for evidence-informed policies about health systems: assessing how much confidence to place in the research evidence.

机构信息

Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

PLoS Med. 2012;9(3):e1001187. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001187. Epub 2012 Mar 20.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001187
PMID:22448147
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3308931/
Abstract

In the third paper in a three-part series on health systems guidance, Simon Lewin and colleagues explore the challenge of assessing how much confidence to place in evidence on health systems interventions.

摘要

在关于卫生系统指南的三篇系列论文中的第三篇中，Simon Lewin 及其同事探讨了如何评估对卫生系统干预措施证据的信任程度这一挑战。