• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Psychometric properties of the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality in a PTSD sample.创伤后应激障碍样本中不适应和适应人格量表的心理测量特性。
Psychol Assess. 2011 Dec;23(4):911-24. doi: 10.1037/a0023985. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
2
Reliability and validity of the Diagnostic Scales of the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality-2 (SNAP-2) in Italian community-dwelling adults and psychiatric patients.《非适应和适应人格-2(SNAP-2)量表诊断量表在意大利社区居住成年人和精神科患者中的信度和效度》的意大利语译文。
Psychol Assess. 2021 Oct;33(10):998-1012. doi: 10.1037/pas0001041. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
3
Development and validation of Big Four personality scales for the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality--Second Edition (SNAP-2).大五人格量表的编制与验证——用于《非适应及适应人格量表第二版》(SNAP-2)。
Psychol Assess. 2012 Sep;24(3):751-63. doi: 10.1037/a0026915. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
4
The Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality (SNAP): temporal stability and predictive validity of the diagnostic scales.非适应性和适应性人格量表(SNAP):诊断量表的时间稳定性和预测效度
Assessment. 2002 Jun;9(2):181-7. doi: 10.1177/10791102009002009.
5
Development and validation of the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality Brief Self-Description Rating Form (SNAP-BSRF).非适应性和适应性人格简短自我描述评定量表(SNAP-BSRF)的编制与验证
Assessment. 2015 Feb;22(1):3-16. doi: 10.1177/1073191114534959. Epub 2014 May 19.
6
Personality-based latent classes of posttraumatic psychopathology: personality disorders and the internalizing/externalizing model.基于人格的创伤后精神病理学潜在类别:人格障碍与内外向模型。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2012 Feb;121(1):256-62. doi: 10.1037/a0023237. Epub 2011 May 16.
7
An item response theory integration of normal and abnormal personality scales.正常与异常人格量表的项目反应理论整合。
Personal Disord. 2010 Jan;1(1):5-21. doi: 10.1037/a0018136.
8
The structure of personality disorders in individuals with posttraumatic stress disorder.创伤后应激障碍个体的人格障碍结构。
Personal Disord. 2011 Oct;2(4):261-78. doi: 10.1037/a0023168.
9
Neither too much, nor too little. The dilemma of identifying personality disorders in adolescents patients with self-reports.既不能太多,也不能太少。使用自陈式报告识别青少年患者人格障碍时的困境。
Psychiatry Res. 2014 Mar 30;215(3):683-6. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.12.020. Epub 2013 Dec 22.
10
Internalizing and externalizing subtypes in female sexual assault survivors: implications for the understanding of complex PTSD.女性性侵犯幸存者的内化和外化亚型:对理解复杂性创伤后应激障碍的启示。
Behav Ther. 2007 Mar;38(1):58-71. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2006.04.003. Epub 2006 Sep 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Longitudinal Associations between Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Severity and Personality Disorder Features among Female Rape Survivors.女性强奸幸存者创伤后应激障碍严重程度与人格障碍特征之间的纵向关联
Front Psychiatry. 2017 Feb 2;8:6. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00006. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

1
Commentary on "Personality traits and the classification of mental disorders: toward a more complete integration in DSM-5 and an empirical model of psychopathology".关于“人格特质与精神障碍分类:DSM-5 更完整的整合与精神病理学实证模型”的述评。
Personal Disord. 2010 Apr;1(2):119-22. doi: 10.1037/a0019974.
2
Personality disorders in DSM-5.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版中的人格障碍
Am J Psychiatry. 2010 Sep;167(9):1026-8. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.10050746.
3
An item response theory integration of normal and abnormal personality scales.正常与异常人格量表的项目反应理论整合。
Personal Disord. 2010 Jan;1(1):5-21. doi: 10.1037/a0018136.
4
All PTSD symptoms are highly associated with general distress: ramifications for the dysphoria symptom cluster.所有 PTSD 症状都与一般痛苦高度相关:对恶劣心境症状群的影响。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2010 Feb;119(1):126-35. doi: 10.1037/a0018477.
5
Modeling psychopathology structure: a symptom-level analysis of Axis I and II disorders.建模精神病理学结构:对轴 I 和 II 障碍的症状水平分析。
Psychol Med. 2010 Feb;40(2):273-88. doi: 10.1017/S0033291709990183. Epub 2009 Jun 11.
6
Differentiating the mood and anxiety disorders: a quadripartite model.区分情绪障碍和焦虑障碍:一个四方模型。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2009;5:221-47. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153510.
7
Can clinicians recognize DSM-IV personality disorders from five-factor model descriptions of patient cases?临床医生能否从患者病例的五因素模型描述中识别出《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)中的人格障碍?
Am J Psychiatry. 2009 Apr;166(4):427-33. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08070972. Epub 2009 Mar 16.
8
The MMPI-2 restructured clinical scales in the assessment of posttraumatic stress disorder and comorbid disorders.明尼苏达多相人格调查表第二版(MMPI-2)重构临床量表在创伤后应激障碍及共病评估中的应用
Psychol Assess. 2008 Dec;20(4):327-40. doi: 10.1037/a0012948.
9
Psychometric properties of PTSD Checklist in sample of male veterans.创伤后应激障碍检查表在男性退伍军人样本中的心理测量学特性。
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45(3):465-74. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2007.09.0138.
10
Synthesizing dimensional and categorical approaches to personality disorders: refining the research agenda for DSM-V Axis II.整合人格障碍的维度和分类方法:完善《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版轴II的研究议程。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2007;16 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S65-73. doi: 10.1002/mpr.212.

创伤后应激障碍样本中不适应和适应人格量表的心理测量特性。

Psychometric properties of the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality in a PTSD sample.

机构信息

National Center for PTSD (116B-2), VA Boston Healthcare System, 150 South Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02130, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Assess. 2011 Dec;23(4):911-24. doi: 10.1037/a0023985. Epub 2011 Jul 18.

DOI:10.1037/a0023985
PMID:21767029
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3229039/
Abstract

This study evaluated the psychometric characteristics of the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality (SNAP; Clark, 1996) in 280 individuals who screened positive for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The SNAP validity, trait, temperament, and personality disorder (PD) scales were compared with scales on the Brief Form of the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire (Patrick, Curtin, & Tellegen, 2002). In a subsample of 86 veterans, the SNAP PD, trait, and temperament scales were also evaluated in comparison to the International Personality Disorder Examination (IPDE; Loranger, 1999), a semistructured diagnostic interview. Results revealed that the SNAP scales have good convergent validity, as evidenced by their pattern of associations with related measures of personality and PD. However, evidence for their discriminant validity in relationship to other measures of personality and PD was more mixed, and test scores on the SNAP trait and temperament scales left much unexplained variance in IPDE-assessed PDs. The diagnostic scoring of the SNAP PD scales greatly inflated prevalence estimates of PDs relative to the IPDE and showed poor agreement with the IPDE. In contrast, the dimensional SNAP scores yielded far stronger associations with continuous scores on the IPDE. The SNAP scales also largely evidenced expected patterns of association with a measure of PTSD severity. Overall, findings support the use of this measure in this population and contribute to our conceptualization of the association between temperament, PTSD, and Axis II psychopathology.

摘要

本研究评估了非适应性和适应性人格量表(SNAP;Clark,1996)在 280 名创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)筛查阳性个体中的心理计量学特征。将 SNAP 的效度、特质、气质和人格障碍(PD)量表与多维人格问卷简式量表(Patrick、Curtin 和 Tellegen,2002)上的量表进行了比较。在 86 名退伍军人的亚样本中,还将 SNAP PD、特质和气质量表与国际人格障碍检查(IPDE;Loranger,1999),一种半结构化诊断访谈进行了比较。结果表明,SNAP 量表具有良好的聚合效度,这表现在它们与人格和 PD 的相关测量指标的关联模式上。然而,它们与其他人格和 PD 测量指标的区分效度的证据则更为混杂,SNAP 特质和气质量表的测试分数在 IPDE 评估的 PD 中留下了大量未解释的方差。SNAP PD 量表的诊断评分极大地夸大了 PD 的患病率估计,与 IPDE 相比,其一致性较差。相比之下,SNAP 的维度得分与 IPDE 的连续得分之间具有更强的关联。SNAP 量表也在很大程度上证明了与 PTSD 严重程度测量之间存在预期的关联模式。总的来说,这些发现支持在该人群中使用该测量工具,并有助于我们对气质、PTSD 和轴 II 精神病理学之间的关联的概念化。