Suppr超能文献

创伤后应激障碍样本中不适应和适应人格量表的心理测量特性。

Psychometric properties of the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality in a PTSD sample.

机构信息

National Center for PTSD (116B-2), VA Boston Healthcare System, 150 South Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02130, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Assess. 2011 Dec;23(4):911-24. doi: 10.1037/a0023985. Epub 2011 Jul 18.

Abstract

This study evaluated the psychometric characteristics of the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality (SNAP; Clark, 1996) in 280 individuals who screened positive for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The SNAP validity, trait, temperament, and personality disorder (PD) scales were compared with scales on the Brief Form of the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire (Patrick, Curtin, & Tellegen, 2002). In a subsample of 86 veterans, the SNAP PD, trait, and temperament scales were also evaluated in comparison to the International Personality Disorder Examination (IPDE; Loranger, 1999), a semistructured diagnostic interview. Results revealed that the SNAP scales have good convergent validity, as evidenced by their pattern of associations with related measures of personality and PD. However, evidence for their discriminant validity in relationship to other measures of personality and PD was more mixed, and test scores on the SNAP trait and temperament scales left much unexplained variance in IPDE-assessed PDs. The diagnostic scoring of the SNAP PD scales greatly inflated prevalence estimates of PDs relative to the IPDE and showed poor agreement with the IPDE. In contrast, the dimensional SNAP scores yielded far stronger associations with continuous scores on the IPDE. The SNAP scales also largely evidenced expected patterns of association with a measure of PTSD severity. Overall, findings support the use of this measure in this population and contribute to our conceptualization of the association between temperament, PTSD, and Axis II psychopathology.

摘要

本研究评估了非适应性和适应性人格量表(SNAP;Clark,1996)在 280 名创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)筛查阳性个体中的心理计量学特征。将 SNAP 的效度、特质、气质和人格障碍(PD)量表与多维人格问卷简式量表(Patrick、Curtin 和 Tellegen,2002)上的量表进行了比较。在 86 名退伍军人的亚样本中,还将 SNAP PD、特质和气质量表与国际人格障碍检查(IPDE;Loranger,1999),一种半结构化诊断访谈进行了比较。结果表明,SNAP 量表具有良好的聚合效度,这表现在它们与人格和 PD 的相关测量指标的关联模式上。然而,它们与其他人格和 PD 测量指标的区分效度的证据则更为混杂,SNAP 特质和气质量表的测试分数在 IPDE 评估的 PD 中留下了大量未解释的方差。SNAP PD 量表的诊断评分极大地夸大了 PD 的患病率估计,与 IPDE 相比,其一致性较差。相比之下,SNAP 的维度得分与 IPDE 的连续得分之间具有更强的关联。SNAP 量表也在很大程度上证明了与 PTSD 严重程度测量之间存在预期的关联模式。总的来说,这些发现支持在该人群中使用该测量工具,并有助于我们对气质、PTSD 和轴 II 精神病理学之间的关联的概念化。

相似文献

1
Psychometric properties of the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality in a PTSD sample.
Psychol Assess. 2011 Dec;23(4):911-24. doi: 10.1037/a0023985. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
7
An item response theory integration of normal and abnormal personality scales.
Personal Disord. 2010 Jan;1(1):5-21. doi: 10.1037/a0018136.
8
The structure of personality disorders in individuals with posttraumatic stress disorder.
Personal Disord. 2011 Oct;2(4):261-78. doi: 10.1037/a0023168.
9
Neither too much, nor too little. The dilemma of identifying personality disorders in adolescents patients with self-reports.
Psychiatry Res. 2014 Mar 30;215(3):683-6. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.12.020. Epub 2013 Dec 22.
10

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Personality disorders in DSM-5.
Am J Psychiatry. 2010 Sep;167(9):1026-8. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.10050746.
3
An item response theory integration of normal and abnormal personality scales.
Personal Disord. 2010 Jan;1(1):5-21. doi: 10.1037/a0018136.
5
Modeling psychopathology structure: a symptom-level analysis of Axis I and II disorders.
Psychol Med. 2010 Feb;40(2):273-88. doi: 10.1017/S0033291709990183. Epub 2009 Jun 11.
6
Differentiating the mood and anxiety disorders: a quadripartite model.
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2009;5:221-47. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153510.
7
Can clinicians recognize DSM-IV personality disorders from five-factor model descriptions of patient cases?
Am J Psychiatry. 2009 Apr;166(4):427-33. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08070972. Epub 2009 Mar 16.
9
Psychometric properties of PTSD Checklist in sample of male veterans.
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45(3):465-74. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2007.09.0138.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验