Department of Psychology, Columbia University, 324 Schermerhorn Hall, 1190 Amsterdam Ave. MC 5501, New York, NY 10027, USA.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Aug;24(8):1742-52. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00233. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
The distinction between processes used to perceive and understand the self and others has received considerable attention in psychology and neuroscience. Brain findings highlight a role for various regions, in particular the medial PFC (mPFC), in supporting judgments about both the self and others. We performed a meta-analysis of 107 neuroimaging studies of self- and other-related judgments using multilevel kernel density analysis [Kober, H., & Wager, T. D. Meta-analyses of neuroimaging data. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews, 1, 293-300, 2010]. We sought to determine what brain regions are reliably involved in each judgment type and, in particular, what the spatial and functional organization of mPFC is with respect to them. Relative to nonmentalizing judgments, both self- and other judgments were associated with activity in mPFC, ranging from ventral to dorsal extents, as well as common activation of the left TPJ and posterior cingulate. A direct comparison between self- and other judgments revealed that ventral mPFC as well as left ventrolateral PFC and left insula were more frequently activated by self-related judgments, whereas dorsal mPFC, in addition to bilateral TPJ and cuneus, was more frequently activated by other-related judgments. Logistic regression analyses revealed that ventral and dorsal mPFC lay at opposite ends of a functional gradient: The z coordinates reported in individual studies predicted whether the study involved self- or other-related judgments, which were associated with increasingly ventral or dorsal portions of mPFC, respectively. These results argue for a distributed rather than localizationist account of mPFC organization and support an emerging view on the functional heterogeneity of mPFC.
自我和他人感知和理解过程的区别在心理学和神经科学中受到了相当多的关注。大脑研究结果强调了各种区域的作用,特别是内侧前额叶皮层(mPFC),支持了对自我和他人的判断。我们使用多层核密度分析[Kober,H.和 Wager,T.D.神经影像学数据的荟萃分析。Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews,1,293-300,2010]对 107 项自我和他人相关判断的神经影像学研究进行了荟萃分析。我们试图确定哪些大脑区域与每种判断类型相关,特别是 mPFC 的空间和功能组织与它们的关系。与非心理化判断相比,自我和他人判断都与 mPFC 的活动相关,从腹侧到背侧,以及左颞顶叶联合区和后扣带回的共同激活。自我判断和他人判断之间的直接比较表明,腹侧 mPFC 以及左外侧前额叶和左岛叶比他人相关判断更常被自我相关判断激活,而背侧 mPFC 除了双侧颞顶叶联合区和楔叶外,比他人相关判断更常被激活。逻辑回归分析表明,腹侧和背侧 mPFC 位于功能梯度的两端:个体研究报告的 z 坐标预测研究是否涉及自我或他人相关判断,这分别与 mPFC 的腹侧或背侧部分相关。这些结果支持了 mPFC 组织的分布式而非定位主义解释,并支持了 mPFC 功能异质性的新兴观点。