• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Survival of 1,181 patients in a phase I clinic: the MD Anderson Clinical Center for targeted therapy experience.1181 例患者在 I 期临床试验中的存活情况:MD 安德森靶向治疗临床中心的经验。
Clin Cancer Res. 2012 May 15;18(10):2922-9. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2217. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
2
Validation of the Royal Marsden Hospital prognostic score in patients treated in the Phase I Clinical Trials Program at the MD Anderson Cancer Center.验证皇家马斯登医院预后评分在 MD 安德森癌症中心 I 期临床试验计划治疗的患者中的应用。
Cancer. 2012 Mar 1;118(5):1422-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26413. Epub 2011 Aug 5.
3
Validation of Prognostic Scores in Patients With Metastatic Urothelial Cancer Enrolling in Phase I Targeted Therapy or Next Generation Immunotherapy Trials.转移性尿路上皮癌患者参加I期靶向治疗或新一代免疫治疗试验时预后评分的验证
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2022 Feb;20(1):e16-e24. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2021.07.004. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
4
Validation of prognostic scoring and assessment of clinical benefit for patients with bone sarcomas enrolled in phase I clinical trials.参加I期临床试验的骨肉瘤患者预后评分的验证及临床获益评估
Oncotarget. 2016 Sep 27;7(39):64421-64430. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.10910.
5
Prospective validation of a prognostic score for patients in immunotherapy phase I trials: The Gustave Roussy Immune Score (GRIm-Score).免疫治疗I期试验患者预后评分的前瞻性验证:古斯塔夫·鲁西免疫评分(GRIm-Score)。
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Oct;84:212-218. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.07.027. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
6
Body composition and survival in the early clinical trials setting.体成分与早期临床试验中的生存。
Eur J Cancer. 2013 Oct;49(15):3068-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.06.026. Epub 2013 Jul 15.
7
Analysis of esophagogastric cancer patients enrolled in the National Cancer Institute Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program sponsored phase 1 trials.国家癌症研究所癌症治疗评估计划赞助的 1 期临床试验中入组的食管胃交界癌患者分析。
Gastric Cancer. 2017 May;20(3):481-488. doi: 10.1007/s10120-016-0629-x. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
8
Prognostic factors of overall survival in children and adolescents enrolled in dose-finding trials in Europe: An Innovative Therapies for Children with Cancer study.欧洲儿童和青少年剂量探索试验中总生存的预后因素:一项儿童癌症创新疗法研究
Eur J Cancer. 2016 Nov;67:130-140. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.08.008. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
9
Survival of patients in a Phase 1 Clinic: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience.一期临床中患者的生存情况:MD安德森癌症中心的经验。
Cancer. 2009 Mar 1;115(5):1091-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24018.
10
Validation of prognostic scoring systems for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma enrolled in phase I clinical trials.验证转移性肾细胞癌患者在 I 期临床试验中的预后评分系统。
ESMO Open. 2020 Nov;5(6):e001073. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2020-001073.

引用本文的文献

1
The prognostic value of a laboratory cachexia score (LCAS) defined by LDH, CRP and albumin in patients with advanced lung cancer.由乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)、C反应蛋白(CRP)和白蛋白定义的实验室恶病质评分(LCAS)在晚期肺癌患者中的预后价值。
BMC Cancer. 2025 Mar 25;25(1):543. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-13426-3.
2
Outcomes Among Racial and Ethnic Minority Patients With Advanced Cancers in Phase 1 Trials: A Meta-Analysis.1 期临床试验中晚期癌症的少数族裔患者的结局:一项荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2421485. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.21485.
3
Prognostic Significance of the Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH) Score in Patients with Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.皇家马斯登医院(RMH)评分在癌症患者中的预后意义:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Cancers (Basel). 2024 May 11;16(10):1835. doi: 10.3390/cancers16101835.
4
Refining patient selection for next-generation immunotherapeutic early-phase clinical trials with a novel and externally validated prognostic nomogram.利用新型且经外部验证的预后列线图,完善下一代免疫治疗早期临床试验的患者选择。
Front Immunol. 2024 Jan 15;15:1323151. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1323151. eCollection 2024.
5
Travel Time and Distance and Participation in Precision Oncology Trials at the National Cancer Center Hospital.旅行时间、距离与参与美国国家癌症中心医院精准肿瘤学试验
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Sep 5;6(9):e2333188. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.33188.
6
Utility of Established Prognostic Scoring Systems for Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Enrolled in Immunotherapy-Based Early-Phase Clinical Trials.建立的预后评分系统在接受基于免疫治疗的早期临床试验的晚期胰腺腺癌细胞中的效用。
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2023 Dec;54(4):1308-1315. doi: 10.1007/s12029-023-00930-7. Epub 2023 Apr 29.
7
Clinical outcome and prognostic factors for Asian patients in Phase I clinical trials.I 期临床试验中亚洲患者的临床结果和预后因素。
Br J Cancer. 2023 Apr;128(8):1514-1520. doi: 10.1038/s41416-023-02193-2. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
8
Predictors of Oncologic Outcome in Patients Receiving Phase I Investigational Therapy for Recurrent or Metastatic Cervical Cancer.接受复发性或转移性宫颈癌I期试验性治疗患者的肿瘤学预后预测因素
J Immunother Precis Oncol. 2023 Jan 6;6(1):10-18. doi: 10.36401/JIPO-22-23. eCollection 2023 Feb.
9
Comparison of Four Clinical Prognostic Scores in Patients with Advanced Gastric and Esophageal Cancer.比较四种临床预后评分系统在晚期胃癌和食管癌患者中的应用。
Oncologist. 2023 Mar 17;28(3):214-219. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac235.
10
Clinical characteristics and outcomes of phase I cancer patients with CCNE1 amplification: MD Anderson experiences.具有 CCNE1 扩增的 I 期癌症患者的临床特征和结局:MD 安德森经验。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 24;12(1):8701. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12669-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Patients with advanced head and neck cancers have similar progression-free survival on phase I trials and their last food and drug administration-approved treatment.晚期头颈部癌症患者在 I 期临床试验和其最后一次获得美国食品药品监督管理局批准的治疗中的无进展生存期相似。
Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Aug 1;16(15):4031-7. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-0672. Epub 2010 Jun 4.
2
Phase I oncology studies: evidence that in the era of targeted therapies patients on lower doses do not fare worse.I 期肿瘤学研究:有证据表明,在靶向治疗时代,接受较低剂量治疗的患者并未表现出更差的结果。
Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Feb 15;16(4):1289-97. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2684. Epub 2010 Feb 9.
3
Phase I clinical trials in 56 patients with thyroid cancer: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience.56 例甲状腺癌患者的 I 期临床试验:安德森癌症中心的经验。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009 Nov;94(11):4423-32. doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-0743. Epub 2009 Oct 9.
4
Prospective validation of a prognostic score to improve patient selection for oncology phase I trials.一种用于改善肿瘤学I期试验患者选择的预后评分的前瞻性验证。
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jun 1;27(16):2692-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.5081. Epub 2009 Mar 30.
5
Survival of patients in a Phase 1 Clinic: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience.一期临床中患者的生存情况:MD安德森癌症中心的经验。
Cancer. 2009 Mar 1;115(5):1091-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24018.
6
Cancer: the road to Amiens.癌症:通往亚眠之路。
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jan 20;27(3):328-33. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.9621. Epub 2008 Dec 8.
7
90-Days mortality rate in patients treated within the context of a phase-I trial: how should we identify patients who should not go on trial?I期试验背景下接受治疗患者的90天死亡率:我们应如何识别不适合参加试验的患者?
Eur J Cancer. 2008 Jul;44(11):1536-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.04.017. Epub 2008 Jun 10.
8
Assigning a cause for a particular outcome in oncology: a serious note of caution.确定肿瘤学中特定结果的病因:郑重提醒注意。
Cancer. 2008 Aug 15;113(4):668-70. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23631.
9
Clinical outcome and prognostic factors for patients treated within the context of a phase I study: the Royal Marsden Hospital experience.I期研究背景下接受治疗患者的临床结局及预后因素:皇家马斯登医院的经验
Br J Cancer. 2008 Mar 25;98(6):1029-33. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604218. Epub 2008 Mar 18.
10
Prognostic factors among cancer patients with good performance status screened for phase I trials.筛选进入I期试验的体能状态良好的癌症患者的预后因素。
Invest New Drugs. 2008 Feb;26(1):53-8. doi: 10.1007/s10637-007-9088-x. Epub 2007 Sep 22.

1181 例患者在 I 期临床试验中的存活情况:MD 安德森靶向治疗临床中心的经验。

Survival of 1,181 patients in a phase I clinic: the MD Anderson Clinical Center for targeted therapy experience.

机构信息

Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Phase I Clinical Trials Program, Biostatistics, and Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.

出版信息

Clin Cancer Res. 2012 May 15;18(10):2922-9. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2217. Epub 2012 Mar 27.

DOI:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2217
PMID:22452943
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4176886/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine whether the Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH; London, UK) prognostic score for phase I patients can be validated in a large group of individuals seen in a different center and whether other prognostic variables are also relevant, we present an analysis of 1,181 patients treated in the MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC; Houston, TX) phase I clinic.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Medical records of 1,181 consecutive patients who were treated on at least one trial in the phase I clinic were reviewed.

RESULTS

The median age was 58 years and 50% were women. The median number of prior therapies was four and median survival 10 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 9.1-10.9 months]. Independent factors that predicted shorter survival in a multivariate Cox model and could be internally validated included RMH score of >1 (P < 0.0001; albumin <3.5 g/dL; lactate dehydrogenase >upper limit of normal, and >two sites of metastases), gastrointestinal tumor type (P < 0.0001), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥ 1 (P = 0.0004). The median survival was 24.0, 15.2, 8.4, 6.2, and 4.1 months for patients with 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 or 5 of the above risk factors, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The RMH score was validated in a large group of patients at MDACC. Internal validation of the independent prognostic factors for survival led to the development of the MDACC prognostic score, a modification of the RMH score that strengthens it.

摘要

目的

为了确定伦敦皇家马斯登医院(RMH)的 I 期患者预后评分能否在另一个中心的大量患者中得到验证,以及其他预后因素是否也具有相关性,我们对在 MD 安德森癌症中心(MDACC)I 期临床诊所接受治疗的 1181 例患者进行了分析。

实验设计

对至少在 I 期临床诊所的一项试验中接受治疗的 1181 例连续患者的病历进行了回顾。

结果

中位年龄为 58 岁,50%为女性。中位治疗前的疗程数为 4 个,中位生存期为 10 个月(95%置信区间,9.1-10.9 个月)。多变量 Cox 模型预测的独立预后因素,且可进行内部验证,包括 RMH 评分>1(P<0.0001;白蛋白<3.5 g/dL;乳酸脱氢酶>正常值上限,且转移灶>2 个部位)、胃肠道肿瘤类型(P<0.0001)和东部肿瘤协作组表现状态≥1(P=0.0004)。无上述危险因素、有 1、2、3、4 或 5 个危险因素的患者的中位生存期分别为 24.0、15.2、8.4、6.2 和 4.1 个月。

结论

RMH 评分在 MDACC 的大量患者中得到了验证。对生存的独立预后因素进行内部验证后,制定了 MDACC 预后评分,对 RMH 评分进行了修正,增强了其效能。