Suppr超能文献

德国特定行业商业和工业废物不同处理方式的温室气体排放。

Greenhouse gas emissions of different waste treatment options for sector-specific commercial and industrial waste in Germany.

机构信息

Institute of Environmental Engineering, Rostock University, Rostock, Germany.

出版信息

Waste Manag Res. 2012 Apr;30(4):421-31. doi: 10.1177/0734242X12441384. Epub 2012 Mar 26.

Abstract

This article investigates greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from commercial and industrial (C&I) waste treatment considering five sector-specific waste compositions and four different treatment scenarios in Germany. Results show that the highest share of CO₂-equivalent emissions can be avoided in each of the analysed industrial sectors if solid recovered fuel (SRF) is produced for co-incineration in cement kilns. Across all industries, emissions of approximately 680 kg CO₂-eq. Mg⁻¹ C&I waste can be avoided on average under this scenario. The combustion of C&I waste in waste incineration plants without any previous mechanical treatment generates the lowest potential to avoid GHG emissions with a value of approximately 50 kg CO₂-eq. Mg⁻¹ C&I waste on average in all industries. If recyclables are sorted, this can save emissions of approximately 280 kg CO₂-eq. Mg⁻¹ C&I waste while the treatment in SRF power plants amounts to savings of approximately 210 kg CO₂-eq. Mg⁻¹ C&I waste. A comparison of the treatment scenarios of the waste from these five sectors shows that waste treatment of the craft sector leads to the lowest CO₂-equivalent reduction rates of all scenarios. In contrast, the treatment of waste from catering sector leads to the highest CO₂-equivalent reduction rates except for direct incineration in waste incineration plants. The sensitivity analysis of the different scenarios for this paper shows that the efficiency and the substitution factor of energy have a relevant influence on the result. Changes in the substitution factor of 10% can result in changes in emissions of approximately 55 to 75 kg CO₂-eq. Mg⁻¹ in waste incineration plants and approximately 90 kg CO₂-eq. Mg⁻¹ in the case of cement kilns.

摘要

本文研究了考虑到德国五个特定行业废物成分和四个不同处理方案的商业和工业(C&I)废物处理中的温室气体(GHG)排放。结果表明,如果为水泥厂的共焚烧生产固体回收燃料(SRF),则可以避免分析中的每个工业部门的 CO₂当量排放量的最高份额。在所有行业中,平均而言,根据该方案可以避免约 680 kg CO₂-eq 的排放量。在没有任何先前机械处理的情况下,在废物焚烧厂中燃烧 C&I 废物会产生最低的避免 GHG 排放的潜力,平均而言,所有行业的排放量约为 50 kg CO₂-eq。Mg⁻¹ C&I 废物。如果对可回收物进行分类,则可以节省约 280 kg CO₂-eq。Mg⁻¹ C&I 废物的排放量,而在 SRF 发电厂中的处理量则可节省约 210 kg CO₂-eq。Mg⁻¹ C&I 废物。对这五个部门的废物处理方案进行比较表明,工艺部门的废物处理导致所有方案中 CO₂当量减排率最低。相比之下,除了在废物焚烧厂中直接焚烧外,餐饮部门的废物处理导致 CO₂当量减排率最高。本文对不同方案的敏感性分析表明,效率和能源替代因子对结果有相关影响。替代因子变化 10%可能导致废物焚烧厂的排放量变化约 55 至 75 kg CO₂-eq。Mg⁻¹,而在水泥厂的情况下则约为 90 kg CO₂-eq。Mg⁻¹。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验