Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), Division of Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
BMC Vet Res. 2012 Mar 28;8:36. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-8-36.
A novel, bead-based flow cytometric assay was developed for simultaneous determination of antibody responses against Toxoplasma gondii and Trichinella spiralis in pig serum. This high throughput screening assay could be an alternative for well known indirect tests like ELISA. One of the advantages of a bead-based assay over ELISA is the possibility to determine multiple specific antibody responses per single sample run facilitated by a series of antigens coupled to identifiable bead-levels. Furthermore, inclusion of a non-coupled bead-level in the same run facilitates the determination of, and correction for non-specific binding. The performance of this bead-based assay was compared to one T. spiralis and three T. gondii ELISAs. For this purpose, sera from T. gondii and T. spiralis experimentally infected pigs were used. With the experimental infection status as gold standard, the area under the curve, Youden Index, sensitivity and specificity were determined through receiver operator curve analysis. Marginal homogeneity and inter-rater agreement between bead-based assay and ELISAs were evaluated using McNemar's Test and Cohen's kappa, respectively.
Results indicated that the areas under the curve of the bead-based assay were 0.911 and 0.885 for T. gondii and T. spiralis, respectively, while that of the T. gondii ELISAs ranged between 0.837 and 0.930 and the T. spiralis ELISA was 0.879. Bead-based T. gondii assay had a sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 96%, while the ELISAs ranged between 64-84% and 93-99%, respectively. The bead-based T. spiralis assay had a sensitivity of 68% and specificity of 100% while the ELISA scored 72% and 95%, respectively. Marginal homogeneity was found between the T. gondii bead-based test and one of the T. gondii ELISAs. Moreover, in this test combination and between T. spiralis bead-based assay and respective ELISA, an excellent inter-rater agreement was found. When results of samples before expected seroconversion were removed from evaluation, notably higher test specifications were found.
This new bead-based test, which detects T. gondii and T. spiralis antibodies simultaneously within each sample, can replace two indirect tests for the determination of respective antibodies separately, while performing equally well or better.
本研究开发了一种新型的基于微球的流式细胞术检测方法,用于同时检测猪血清中抗弓形虫和旋毛虫的抗体反应。这种高通量筛选检测方法可以替代 ELISA 等知名的间接检测方法。与 ELISA 相比,基于微球的检测方法的一个优势是可以通过一系列偶联到可识别的微球水平的抗原,在单次样本运行中同时检测多种特异性抗体反应。此外,在同一运行中包含一个未偶联的微球水平,可以方便地确定和校正非特异性结合。本研究将该基于微球的检测方法与一种旋毛虫和三种弓形虫 ELISA 进行了比较。为此,使用了弓形虫和旋毛虫实验感染猪的血清。以实验感染状态为金标准,通过接受者操作特征曲线分析确定曲线下面积、约登指数、敏感性和特异性。使用 McNemar 检验和 Cohen's kappa 分别评估基于微球的检测方法和 ELISA 之间的边缘一致性和评分者间一致性。
结果表明,基于微球的检测方法对弓形虫和旋毛虫的曲线下面积分别为 0.911 和 0.885,而弓形虫 ELISA 的范围在 0.837 和 0.930 之间,旋毛虫 ELISA 为 0.879。基于微球的弓形虫检测方法的敏感性为 86%,特异性为 96%,而 ELISA 的敏感性范围为 64-84%,特异性为 93-99%。基于微球的旋毛虫检测方法的敏感性为 68%,特异性为 100%,而 ELISA 的敏感性和特异性分别为 72%和 95%。在弓形虫基于微球的检测方法和其中一种弓形虫 ELISA 之间发现了边缘一致性。此外,在这种检测组合中和在旋毛虫基于微球的检测方法和各自的 ELISA 之间,发现了极好的评分者间一致性。当从评估中去除预期血清转化前的样本结果时,发现了明显更高的检测规范。
这种新的基于微球的检测方法可以同时检测每个样本中的弓形虫和旋毛虫抗体,替代两种间接检测方法分别检测各自的抗体,同时表现出同等或更好的效果。