Suppr超能文献

非裔美国父母对生物银行参与和自身及子女研究结果返还的态度。

Attitudes of African-American parents about biobank participation and return of results for themselves and their children.

机构信息

Department of Anthropology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2012 Sep;38(9):561-6. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100600. Epub 2012 May 9.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Biobank-based research is growing in importance. A major controversy exists about the return of aggregate and individual research results.

METHODS

The authors used a mixed-method approach in order to study parents' attitudes towards the return of research results regarding themselves and their children. Participants attended four 2-h, deliberative-engagement sessions held on two consecutive Saturdays. Each session consisted of an educational presentation followed by focus-group discussions with structured questions and prompts. This manuscript examines discussions from the second Saturday which focused on the benefits and risks of returning aggregate and individual research results regarding both adults (morning session) and children (afternoon session). Attitudes were assessed in pre-engagement and post-engagement surveys.

RESULTS

The authors recruited 45 African-American adults whose children received medical care at two healthcare facilities on the South Side of Chicago that serve different socioeconomic communities. Three dominant themes were identified. First, most participants stated that they would enrol themselves and their children in a biobank, although there was a vocal minority opposed to enrolling children, particularly children unable to participate in the consent process. Second, participants did not distinguish between the results they wanted to receive regarding themselves and their children. Supplemental survey data found no attitudinal changes pre-engagement and post-engagement. Third, participants believed that children should be allowed access to their health information, but they wanted to be involved in deciding when and how the information was shared.

DISCUSSION

Participant attitudes are in tension with current biobank policies. An intensive educational effort had no effect on their attitudes.

摘要

简介

基于生物库的研究越来越重要。关于返回综合和个体研究结果,存在着一个主要的争议。

方法

作者采用混合方法研究了父母对自己和孩子的研究结果的返回态度。参与者参加了四个为期 2 小时的、连续两个星期六举行的审议参与会议。每个会议包括一个教育演示,然后是焦点小组讨论,有结构化的问题和提示。本文考察了第二个星期六会议的讨论内容,重点是返回成人(上午会议)和儿童(下午会议)的综合和个体研究结果的利弊。在参与前和参与后进行了态度评估。

结果

作者招募了 45 名非裔美国成年人,他们的孩子在芝加哥南部的两家医疗保健机构接受医疗服务,这两家机构服务于不同的社会经济社区。确定了三个主要主题。首先,大多数参与者表示他们将自己和孩子纳入生物库,尽管有一小部分人强烈反对纳入儿童,特别是那些无法参与同意过程的儿童。其次,参与者没有区分他们希望为自己和孩子收到的结果。补充调查数据显示,参与前和参与后态度没有变化。第三,参与者认为应该允许儿童访问他们的健康信息,但他们希望参与决定何时以及如何共享信息。

讨论

参与者的态度与当前的生物库政策存在冲突。强化教育努力对他们的态度没有影响。

相似文献

1
Attitudes of African-American parents about biobank participation and return of results for themselves and their children.
J Med Ethics. 2012 Sep;38(9):561-6. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100600. Epub 2012 May 9.
2
Biobank participation and returning research results: perspectives from a deliberative engagement in South Side Chicago.
Am J Med Genet A. 2012 May;158A(5):1029-37. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.34414. Epub 2012 Mar 21.
3
Parents' attitudes toward consent and data sharing in biobanks: A multisite experimental survey.
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2018 Jul-Sep;9(3):128-142. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2018.1505783. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
4
Incidental findings of therapeutic misconception in biobank-based research.
Genet Med. 2012 Jun;14(6):611-5. doi: 10.1038/gim.2011.50. Epub 2012 Jan 26.
5
Enhancing Autonomy in Biobank Decisions: Too Much of a Good Thing?
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2018 Apr;13(2):125-138. doi: 10.1177/1556264617753483. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
6
Parental attitudes and expectations towards receiving genomic test results in healthy children.
Transl Behav Med. 2018 Jan 29;8(1):44-53. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibx044.
9
Engaging African-Americans about biobanks and the return of research results.
J Community Genet. 2012 Oct;3(4):275-83. doi: 10.1007/s12687-012-0091-3. Epub 2012 Mar 28.

引用本文的文献

1
A Just Genomics Needs an ELSI of Translation.
Hastings Cent Rep. 2024 Dec;54 Suppl 2:S126-S135. doi: 10.1002/hast.4938.
2
Parent attitudes towards data sharing in developmental science.
Open Res Eur. 2024 Jun 3;3:182. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.16516.2. eCollection 2023.
3
Engaging publics in biobanking and genetic research governance - a literature review towards informing practice in India.
Wellcome Open Res. 2021 Feb 16;6:5. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16558.2. eCollection 2021.
4
Reasons for participation in a child development study: Are cases with developmental diagnoses different from controls?
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2022 May;36(3):435-445. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12861. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
5
Implementing genomic screening in diverse populations.
Genome Med. 2021 Feb 5;13(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13073-021-00832-y.
6
Perspectives regarding family disclosure of genetic research results in three racial and ethnic minority populations.
J Community Genet. 2020 Oct;11(4):433-443. doi: 10.1007/s12687-020-00472-6. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
7
Using Mixed Methods to Examine Perceptions and Willingness to Participate in Bio-specimen Banking in Diverse Asian Americans.
J Community Med Health Educ. 2014;4(3). doi: 10.4172/2161-0711.1000283. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
8
Sharing longitudinal, non-biological birth cohort data: a cross-sectional analysis of parent consent preferences.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018 Nov 12;18(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0683-x.
9
Returning Results: Let's Be Honest!
Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2017 Mar;21(3):134-139. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2016.0395. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
10
Development and Validation of the Biomedical Research Trust Scale (BRTS) in English and Spanish.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2016 Oct;11(4):346-356. doi: 10.1177/1556264616668973. Epub 2016 Sep 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Engaging African-Americans about biobanks and the return of research results.
J Community Genet. 2012 Oct;3(4):275-83. doi: 10.1007/s12687-012-0091-3. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
2
Biobank participation and returning research results: perspectives from a deliberative engagement in South Side Chicago.
Am J Med Genet A. 2012 May;158A(5):1029-37. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.34414. Epub 2012 Mar 21.
4
Population biobanks and returning individual research results: mission impossible or new directions?
Hum Genet. 2011 Sep;130(3):393-401. doi: 10.1007/s00439-011-1021-x. Epub 2011 Jun 5.
5
Tissue donation to biobanks: a review of sociological studies.
Sociol Health Illn. 2011 Jul;33(5):792-811. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01342.x. Epub 2011 May 18.
6
Children, biobanks and the scope of parental consent.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2011 Jul;19(7):735-9. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2011.29. Epub 2011 Mar 9.
7
Research ethics. Research practice and participant preferences: the growing gulf.
Science. 2011 Jan 21;331(6015):287-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1199000.
9
The return of individual research findings in paediatric genetic research.
J Med Ethics. 2011 Mar;37(3):179-83. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.037473. Epub 2010 Nov 8.
10
Preferences regarding genetic research results: comparing veterans and nonveterans responses.
Public Health Genomics. 2010;13(7-8):431-9. doi: 10.1159/000317099. Epub 2010 Sep 9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验