Department of Anthropology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
J Med Ethics. 2012 Sep;38(9):561-6. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100600. Epub 2012 May 9.
Biobank-based research is growing in importance. A major controversy exists about the return of aggregate and individual research results.
The authors used a mixed-method approach in order to study parents' attitudes towards the return of research results regarding themselves and their children. Participants attended four 2-h, deliberative-engagement sessions held on two consecutive Saturdays. Each session consisted of an educational presentation followed by focus-group discussions with structured questions and prompts. This manuscript examines discussions from the second Saturday which focused on the benefits and risks of returning aggregate and individual research results regarding both adults (morning session) and children (afternoon session). Attitudes were assessed in pre-engagement and post-engagement surveys.
The authors recruited 45 African-American adults whose children received medical care at two healthcare facilities on the South Side of Chicago that serve different socioeconomic communities. Three dominant themes were identified. First, most participants stated that they would enrol themselves and their children in a biobank, although there was a vocal minority opposed to enrolling children, particularly children unable to participate in the consent process. Second, participants did not distinguish between the results they wanted to receive regarding themselves and their children. Supplemental survey data found no attitudinal changes pre-engagement and post-engagement. Third, participants believed that children should be allowed access to their health information, but they wanted to be involved in deciding when and how the information was shared.
Participant attitudes are in tension with current biobank policies. An intensive educational effort had no effect on their attitudes.
基于生物库的研究越来越重要。关于返回综合和个体研究结果,存在着一个主要的争议。
作者采用混合方法研究了父母对自己和孩子的研究结果的返回态度。参与者参加了四个为期 2 小时的、连续两个星期六举行的审议参与会议。每个会议包括一个教育演示,然后是焦点小组讨论,有结构化的问题和提示。本文考察了第二个星期六会议的讨论内容,重点是返回成人(上午会议)和儿童(下午会议)的综合和个体研究结果的利弊。在参与前和参与后进行了态度评估。
作者招募了 45 名非裔美国成年人,他们的孩子在芝加哥南部的两家医疗保健机构接受医疗服务,这两家机构服务于不同的社会经济社区。确定了三个主要主题。首先,大多数参与者表示他们将自己和孩子纳入生物库,尽管有一小部分人强烈反对纳入儿童,特别是那些无法参与同意过程的儿童。其次,参与者没有区分他们希望为自己和孩子收到的结果。补充调查数据显示,参与前和参与后态度没有变化。第三,参与者认为应该允许儿童访问他们的健康信息,但他们希望参与决定何时以及如何共享信息。
参与者的态度与当前的生物库政策存在冲突。强化教育努力对他们的态度没有影响。