Riley R W, Powell N B, Guilleminault C
Stanford University Sleep Disorders Center, CA.
Chest. 1990 Dec;98(6):1421-5. doi: 10.1378/chest.98.6.1421.
Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the primary therapy for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). Recent reports have indicated, however, that there is a small but significant number of failures related to patient compliance. Primary surgical treatment, which has been uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP), has declined because of poor results. A reviewed of UPPP failures has shown that while UPPP eliminated palatal obstruction, it failed to eliminate base of tongue obstruction. Maxillofacial surgery has been reported as treatment of OSAS by correcting base of tongue obstruction. Thirty patients with severe OSAS were evaluated to compare nasal CPAP and maxillofacial surgery. The goal was to determine if our surgical protocol was as effective as nasal CPAP. All patients initially underwent baseline diagnostic polysomnography to document OSAS. A nasal CPAP study was performed to determine the appropriate positive end-expiratory pressure. The patients in this study were using nasal CPAP, but they found it unacceptable as long-term treatment and elected surgery. Maxillofacial surgery consisted of maxillary, mandibular, and hyoid advancement. Polysomnography was performed six months following surgery and compared with the night 2 CPAP results. The parameters included in the investigation were the respiratory disturbance index (RDI), lowest SaO2, number of SaO2 falls below 90 percent, total sleep time (TST), REM sleep percent, stage 3-4 sleep percent, and wake after sleep onset. The mean RDI before treatment was 72.0 (SD 25.7). After completing therapy, the RDI from surgery and CPAP was 8.8 (SD 6.0) and 8.6 (SD 4.1), respectively. The mean low SaO2 prior to treatment was 61.0 (SD 13.5), and the CPAP results and postsurgical results were 86.2 (SD 5.5) and 86.1 (SD 4.2), respectively. An analysis of variance was used to examine the results, and there was no statistical difference between nasal CPAP and surgery for all respiratory variables.
鼻持续气道正压通气(CPAP)是阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征(OSAS)的主要治疗方法。然而,最近的报告表明,与患者依从性相关的治疗失败病例数量虽少但具有统计学意义。曾经作为主要外科治疗方法的悬雍垂腭咽成形术(UPPP),由于效果不佳而逐渐减少应用。对UPPP治疗失败病例的回顾显示,虽然UPPP消除了腭部阻塞,但未能消除舌根阻塞。有报道称颌面外科手术可通过纠正舌根阻塞来治疗OSAS。对30例重度OSAS患者进行了评估,以比较鼻CPAP和颌面外科手术的效果。目的是确定我们的手术方案是否与鼻CPAP一样有效。所有患者最初均接受基线诊断性多导睡眠图检查以记录OSAS情况。进行鼻CPAP研究以确定合适的呼气末正压。本研究中的患者一直在使用鼻CPAP,但他们认为其作为长期治疗不可接受,因而选择手术治疗。颌面外科手术包括上颌骨、下颌骨和舌骨前移。术后6个月进行多导睡眠图检查,并与第2晚CPAP检查结果进行比较。调查中纳入的参数包括呼吸紊乱指数(RDI)、最低血氧饱和度(SaO2)、SaO2低于90%的次数、总睡眠时间(TST)、快速眼动(REM)睡眠百分比、3-4期睡眠百分比以及睡眠开始后的觉醒情况。治疗前的平均RDI为72.0(标准差25.7)。完成治疗后,手术组和CPAP组的RDI分别为8.8(标准差6.0)和8.6(标准差4.1)。治疗前的平均最低SaO2为61.0(标准差13.5),CPAP组和术后组的结果分别为86.2(标准差5.5)和86.1(标准差4.2)。采用方差分析来检验结果,所有呼吸变量在鼻CPAP和手术治疗之间均无统计学差异。