Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, INF 400, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.
Radiat Oncol. 2012 Mar 29;7:51. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-7-51.
To investigate repositioning accuracy in particle radiotherapy in 6 degrees of freedom (DOF) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT, 3 DOF) for two immobilization devices (Scotchcast masks vs thermoplastic head masks) currently in use at our institution for fractionated radiation therapy in head and neck cancer patients.
Position verifications in patients treated with carbon ion therapy and IMRT for head and neck malignancies were evaluated. Most patients received combined treatment regimen (IMRT plus carbon ion boost), immobilization was achieved with either Scotchcast or thermoplastic head masks. Position corrections in robotic-based carbon ion therapy allowing 6 DOF were compared to IMRT allowing corrections in 3 DOF for two standard immobilization devices. In total, 838 set-up controls of 38 patients were analyzed.
Robotic-based position correction including correction of rotations was well tolerated and without discomfort. Standard deviations of translational components were between 0.5 and 0.8 mm for Scotchcast and 0.7 and 1.3 mm for thermoplastic masks in 6 DOF and 1.2-1.4 mm and 1.0-1.1 mm in 3 DOF respectively. Mean overall displacement vectors were between 2.1 mm (Scotchcast) and 2.9 mm (thermoplastic masks) in 6 DOF and 3.9-3.0 mm in 3 DOF respectively. Displacement vectors were lower when correction in 6 DOF was allowed as opposed to 3 DOF only, which was maintained at the traditional action level of >3 mm for position correction in the pre-on-board imaging era.
Setup accuracy for both systems was within the expected range. Smaller shifts were required when 6 DOF were available for correction as opposed to 3 DOF. Where highest possible positioning accuracy is required, frequent image guidance is mandatory to achieve best possible plan delivery and maintenance of sharp gradients and optimal normal tissue sparing inherent in carbon ion therapy.
研究两种目前在本机构用于头颈部癌症患者分次放射治疗的固定装置(苏格兰铸造面罩与热塑面罩)在 6 自由度(6DOF)粒子放疗和强度调制放疗(3DOF)中的重新定位精度。
评估了接受碳离子治疗和调强适形放疗的头颈部恶性肿瘤患者的位置验证。大多数患者接受联合治疗方案(调强适形放疗加碳离子束推量),使用苏格兰铸造面罩或热塑面罩进行固定。比较了基于机器人的允许 6DOF 的碳离子治疗的位置校正与允许在 3DOF 中进行校正的调强适形放疗,这两种方法分别针对两种标准固定装置。总共分析了 38 名患者的 838 个摆位控制。
基于机器人的位置校正包括旋转校正,患者耐受性良好,没有不适。6DOF 下苏格兰铸造和热塑面罩的平移分量标准偏差分别为 0.5-0.8mm 和 0.7-1.3mm,3DOF 下分别为 1.2-1.4mm 和 1.0-1.1mm。6DOF 下的平均总位移矢量分别为 2.1mm(苏格兰铸造)和 2.9mm(热塑面罩),3DOF 下分别为 3.9-3.0mm。与仅允许 3DOF 校正相比,允许 6DOF 校正时的位移矢量较低,这在预成像时代的位置校正中保持了传统的动作水平>3mm。
两种系统的摆位精度均在预期范围内。当可以进行 6DOF 校正时,所需的移位较小。在需要尽可能高的定位精度的情况下,必须进行频繁的图像引导,以实现最佳的计划交付,并保持碳离子治疗固有的陡峭梯度和最佳的正常组织保护。