• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用不同面罩系统的脑适形调强放疗中患者体位的质量。

Quality of patient positioning during cerebral tomotherapy irradiation using different mask systems.

机构信息

Radiologische Klinik, FE Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinik Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53105, Bonn, Germany,

出版信息

Strahlenther Onkol. 2014 Apr;190(4):382-5. doi: 10.1007/s00066-013-0496-x. Epub 2013 Dec 11.

DOI:10.1007/s00066-013-0496-x
PMID:24322995
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Patient immobilization during brain tumor radiotherapy is achieved by employing different mask systems. Two innovative mask systems were developed to minimize the problems of claustrophobic patients. Our aim was to evaluate whether the quality of patient immobilization using the new mask systems was equivalent to the standard mask system currently in use.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty-three patients with cerebral target volumes were irradiated using the Hi-Art II tomotherapy system between 2010 and 2012. Each group of 11 patients was fitted with one of the two new mask systems (Crystal® or Open Face® mask, Orfit) or the standard three-point mask (Raycast®-HP, Orfit) and a total of 557 radiotherapy fractions were evaluated. After positioning was checked by MV-CT, the necessary table adjustments were noted. Data were analyzed by comparing the groups, and safety margins were calculated for nonimage-guided irradiation.

RESULTS

The mean values of the table adjustments were: (a) lateral (mm): - 0.22 (mask 1, standard deviation (σ): 2.15); 1.1 (mask 2, σ: 2.4); - 0.64 (mask 3, σ: 2.9); (b) longitudinal (mm): - 1 (mask 1, σ: 2.57); - 0.5 (mask 2, σ: 4.7); - 1.22 (mask 3, σ: 2.52); (c) vertical (mm): 0.62 (mask 1, σ: 0.63); 1.2 (mask 2, σ: 1.0); 0.57 (mask 3, σ: 0.28); (d) roll: 0.35° (mask 1, σ: 0.75); 0° (mask 2, σ: 0.8); 0.02° (mask 3, σ: 1.12). The outcomes suggest necessary safety margins of 5.49-7.38 mm (lateral), 5.4-6.56 mm (longitudinal), 0.82-3.9 mm (vertical), and 1.93-4.5° (roll). There were no significant differences between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The new mask systems improve patient comfort while providing consistent patient positioning.

摘要

背景与目的

在脑肿瘤放射治疗中,通过使用不同的面罩系统来实现患者的固定。两种创新的面罩系统已被开发出来,以最小化幽闭恐惧症患者的问题。我们的目的是评估使用新面罩系统进行患者固定的质量是否等同于目前使用的标准面罩系统。

材料与方法

2010 年至 2012 年期间,使用 Hi-Art II 断层放疗系统对 33 例颅内靶区患者进行放疗。每组 11 例患者分别使用两种新面罩系统(Crystal®或 Open Face®面罩,Orfit)或标准三点式面罩(Raycast®-HP,Orfit)进行固定,并对 557 个放疗分次进行评估。在 MV-CT 检查定位后,记录必要的床面调整。通过组间比较分析数据,并计算非图像引导放疗的安全边界。

结果

床面调整的平均值为:(a)侧向(mm):-0.22(面罩 1,标准差(σ):2.15);1.1(面罩 2,σ:2.4);-0.64(面罩 3,σ:2.9);(b)纵向(mm):-1(面罩 1,σ:2.57);-0.5(面罩 2,σ:4.7);-1.22(面罩 3,σ:2.52);(c)垂直(mm):0.62(面罩 1,σ:0.63);1.2(面罩 2,σ:1.0);0.57(面罩 3,σ:0.28);(d)旋转(°):0.35(面罩 1,σ:0.75);0(面罩 2,σ:0.8);0.02(面罩 3,σ:1.12)。结果表明,侧向、纵向、垂直和旋转方向的安全边界分别为 5.49-7.38mm、5.4-6.56mm、0.82-3.9mm 和 1.93-4.5°。各组之间无显著差异。

结论

新型面罩系统在提高患者舒适度的同时,提供了一致的患者定位。

相似文献

1
Quality of patient positioning during cerebral tomotherapy irradiation using different mask systems.使用不同面罩系统的脑适形调强放疗中患者体位的质量。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2014 Apr;190(4):382-5. doi: 10.1007/s00066-013-0496-x. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
2
Migration from full-head mask to "open-face" mask for immobilization of patients with head and neck cancer.将头颈部癌症患者的全头颅面罩改为“开面”面罩进行固定。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2013 Sep 6;14(5):243-54. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v14i5.4400.
3
Clinical evaluation of a robotic 6-degree of freedom treatment couch for frameless radiosurgery.一种用于无框架放射外科的机器人 6 自由度治疗床的临床评估。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 May 1;83(1):467-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.05.048. Epub 2011 Sep 22.
4
A prospective evaluation of open face masks for head and neck radiation therapy.对头颈部放射治疗中开放式面罩的前瞻性评估。
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2016 Nov-Dec;6(6):e259-e267. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2016.02.003. Epub 2016 Feb 13.
5
Uncertainty in the positioning of patients receiving treatment for brain metastases and wearing surgical mask underneath thermoplastic mask during COVID-19 crisis.COVID-19 危机期间,接受脑部转移治疗且佩戴热塑面具下手术口罩的患者定位的不确定性。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021 Jun;22(6):274-280. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13279. Epub 2021 May 24.
6
Intra-fractional patient setup error during fractionated intracranial stereotactic irradiation treatment of patients wearing medical masks: comparison with and without bite block during COVID-19 pandemic.佩戴医用口罩的患者接受分次颅内立体定向放射治疗时的分次内患者摆位误差:与 COVID-19 大流行期间使用和不使用咬合块时的比较。
J Radiat Res. 2021 Jan 1;62(1):163-171. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rraa101.
7
Repositioning accuracy of a commercially available thermoplastic mask system.一种市售热塑性面罩系统的重新定位精度。
Radiother Oncol. 2004 Jun;71(3):339-45. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2004.03.003.
8
Inter- and intrafraction patient positioning uncertainties for intracranial radiotherapy: a study of four frameless, thermoplastic mask-based immobilization strategies using daily cone-beam CT.颅内放射治疗中患者的摆位误差:一项使用每日锥形束 CT 研究四种无框架、热塑面罩固定技术的研究。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 May 1;80(1):281-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.06.022. Epub 2010 Oct 15.
9
Development of a phantom to evaluate the positioning accuracy of patient immobilization systems using thermoplastic mask and polyurethane cradle.开发一种使用热塑面具和聚氨酯底座的体模,以评估患者固定系统的定位准确性。
Med Phys. 2012 Jul;39(7):4219-27. doi: 10.1118/1.4728978.
10
Randomized self-controlled study comparing open-face vs. closed immobilization masks in fractionated cranial radiotherapy.比较分割颅放疗中开放式与封闭式固定面罩的随机自身对照研究。
Radiother Oncol. 2024 Jul;196:110314. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110314. Epub 2024 Apr 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of personalized open-face mask combined with styrofoam fixation in radiotherapy treatment of head and neck cancers: a prospective randomized controlled trial.个性化开放式面罩联合泡沫板固定在头颈部癌症放射治疗中的有效性:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Radiat Oncol. 2025 Mar 11;20(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s13014-025-02609-8.
2
A review of Image Guided Radiation Therapy in head and neck cancer from 2009-201 - Best Practice Recommendations for RTTs in the Clinic.2009年至201年头颈部癌图像引导放射治疗综述——临床放疗技师的最佳实践建议
Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol. 2020 Jun 12;14:43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2020.02.002. eCollection 2020 Jun.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Three-dimensional surface scanning for accurate patient positioning and monitoring during breast cancer radiotherapy.三维表面扫描在乳腺癌放疗中实现精确的患者定位和监测。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2013 Oct;189(10):887-93. doi: 10.1007/s00066-013-0358-6. Epub 2013 Jun 7.
2
Clinical evaluation of a commercial surface-imaging system for patient positioning in radiotherapy.一种商业表面成像系统用于放射治疗中患者定位的临床评估。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2012 Dec;188(12):1080-4. doi: 10.1007/s00066-012-0244-7. Epub 2012 Nov 10.
3
Robotic-based carbon ion therapy and patient positioning in 6 degrees of freedom: setup accuracy of two standard immobilization devices used in carbon ion therapy and IMRT.
3D-Printed masks as a new approach for immobilization in radiotherapy - a study of positioning accuracy.
3D打印面罩作为放射治疗中固定的新方法——定位准确性研究
Oncotarget. 2018 Jan 8;9(5):6490-6498. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.24032. eCollection 2018 Jan 19.
基于机器人的碳离子治疗和 6 自由度患者定位:两种用于碳离子治疗和调强放射治疗的标准固定装置的摆位精度。
Radiat Oncol. 2012 Mar 29;7:51. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-7-51.
4
Three-dimensional patient setup errors at different treatment sites measured by the Tomotherapy megavoltage CT.由 Tomotherapy 兆伏 CT 测量的不同治疗部位的三维患者摆位误差。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2012 Apr;188(4):346-52. doi: 10.1007/s00066-011-0066-z. Epub 2012 Mar 9.
5
Inter- and intrafraction patient positioning uncertainties for intracranial radiotherapy: a study of four frameless, thermoplastic mask-based immobilization strategies using daily cone-beam CT.颅内放射治疗中患者的摆位误差:一项使用每日锥形束 CT 研究四种无框架、热塑面罩固定技术的研究。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 May 1;80(1):281-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.06.022. Epub 2010 Oct 15.
6
Evaluation of the planning target volume in the treatment of head and neck cancer with intensity-modulated radiotherapy: what is the appropriate expansion margin in the setting of daily image guidance?调强放疗治疗头颈部癌症时计划靶区的评估:在每日图像引导的情况下,合适的扩展边界是多少?
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Nov 15;81(4):943-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.07.017. Epub 2010 Oct 6.
7
Cone-beam CT assessment of interfraction and intrafraction setup error of two head-and-neck cancer thermoplastic masks.锥形束 CT 评估两种头颈部癌症热塑面罩分次间和分次内摆位误差。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Mar 1;76(3):949-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.07.004. Epub 2010 Jan 7.
8
Comparison of repositioning accuracy of two commercially available immobilization systems for treatment of head-and-neck tumors using simulation computed tomography imaging.使用模拟计算机断层扫描成像比较两种市售固定系统对头颈部肿瘤治疗的重新定位准确性。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Apr 1;70(5):1389-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.08.035. Epub 2008 Jan 22.
9
Helical tomotherapy. Experiences of the first 150 patients in Heidelberg.螺旋断层放射治疗。海德堡首批150例患者的经验。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2008 Jan;184(1):8-14. doi: 10.1007/s00066-008-1778-6.
10
Repositioning accuracy of two different mask systems-3D revisited: comparison using true 3D/3D matching with cone-beam CT.两种不同面罩系统的重新定位精度——3D再探讨:使用锥束CT进行真3D/3D匹配的比较
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Dec 1;66(5):1568-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.08.054.