Suppr超能文献

牛心包补丁修复感染性创面。

Bovine pericardial patch repair in infected fields.

机构信息

Minneapolis Vascular Physicians, Plymouth, MN 55456, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2012 Jun;55(6):1712-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.11.139. Epub 2012 Mar 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Bovine pericardial patches (BPP) are frequently used for arterial reconstruction, but little data exist regarding their ability to resist infection. We hypothesize that BPP would provide a reasonable alternative to autologous vein patches in infected fields.

METHODS

We used BPP to repair 51 arteriotomies (25 brachial, 23 femoral, three popliteal) in 48 consecutive patients (mean age, 68 years; 65% men, 75% diabetic, 67% dialysis dependent) undergoing removal of infected (33 gram-positive, three gram-negative, eight mixed flora, and four culture-negative) polytetrafluoroethylene grafts (35 arteriovenous grafts, nine femoral-distal bypasses, and four femoral patch angioplasties) between January 2007 and January 2011. Patient records were retrospectively reviewed and outcomes, including death, rupture, secondary reconstruction, and infection, were recorded.

RESULTS

Over a mean follow-up of 2.1 years (range, 3-48 months), 50 of 51 patches remained in place without evidence of recurrent infection, rupture, or revision. One patient had acute rupture of a popliteal arteriotomy 1 week postrepair and had subsequent ligation and above-knee amputation. Eight of the 48 patients died from unrelated causes during follow-up (three withdrew from dialysis, three myocardial infarction, and two unknown).

CONCLUSIONS

BPP provide a durable alternative to saphenous vein for arterial reconstruction following removal of infected arterial grafts.

摘要

目的

牛心包补片(Bovine pericardial patches,BPP)常用于动脉重建,但关于其抗感染能力的数据较少。我们假设 BPP 在感染部位可作为自体静脉补片的合理替代物。

方法

我们使用 BPP 修复了 48 例连续患者(平均年龄 68 岁;65%为男性,75%为糖尿病患者,67%依赖透析)的 51 处动脉切开术(25 例肱动脉,23 例股动脉,3 例腘动脉),这些患者均因感染(33 例革兰阳性菌,3 例革兰阴性菌,8 例混合菌群,4 例培养阴性)而需移除聚四氟乙烯移植物(35 例动静脉移植物,9 例股动脉远端旁路,4 例股动脉补片血管成形术)。研究时间为 2007 年 1 月至 2011 年 1 月。回顾性分析患者的病历资料,记录包括死亡、破裂、二次重建和感染等结局。

结果

平均随访 2.1 年(3-48 个月)后,51 个补片中 50 个仍保持原位,无复发性感染、破裂或再次修复的证据。1 例患者在修补后 1 周出现急性腘动脉切开术破裂,随后行结扎和膝上截肢。48 例患者中有 8 例在随访期间因其他原因死亡(3 例退出透析,3 例心肌梗死,2 例原因不明)。

结论

BPP 为感染性动脉移植物移除后动脉重建提供了一种耐用的自体静脉替代物。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验