Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2013 Aug;34(8):1956-70. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22038. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is often associated with pathological uncertainty regarding whether an action has been performed correctly or whether a bad outcome will occur, leading to compulsive "evidence gathering" behaviors aimed at reducing uncertainty. The current study used event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate neural functioning in OCD patients and controls as subjective certainty was rated in response to sequential pieces of evidence for a decision. Uncertainty was experimentally manipulated so that some decisions were associated with no "objective" uncertainty (all observed evidence pointed to one correct choice), whereas other decisions contained calculable but varying levels of objective uncertainty based on displayed probabilities. Results indicated that OCD patients differed from controls on decisions that contained no objective uncertainty, such that patients rated themselves as more uncertain. Patients also showed greater activation in a network of brain regions previously associated with internally-focused thought and valuation including ventromedial prefrontal cortex, parahippocampus, middle temporal cortex, as well as amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex/ventral anterior insula. In the patient group, a significantly greater number of positive intersubject correlations were found among several of these brain regions, suggesting that this network is more interconnected in patients. OCD patients did not differ from controls on decisions where task parameters led to uncertainty. These results indicate that OCD is associated with hyperactivation in a network of limbic/paralimbic brain regions when making decisions, which may contribute to the greater subjective experience of doubt that characterizes the disorder.
强迫症(OCD)常与对一个行为是否正确执行或不良后果是否会发生的病理性不确定性有关,导致强迫性的“证据收集”行为,以减少不确定性。本研究使用事件相关功能磁共振成像来研究强迫症患者和对照组的神经功能,因为主观确定性是针对决策的连续证据进行评分的。不确定性是通过实验操纵的,因此一些决策与没有“客观”不确定性(所有观察到的证据都指向一个正确的选择)有关,而其他决策则包含可计算但不确定程度不同的客观不确定性,具体取决于显示的概率。结果表明,强迫症患者在没有客观不确定性的决策中与对照组不同,即患者对自己的不确定性评价更高。患者在以前与内部关注思维和估值相关的脑区网络中也表现出更大的激活,包括腹内侧前额叶皮层、海马旁回、颞中回,以及杏仁核和眶额皮层/腹侧前扣带。在患者组中,在这些脑区中的几个脑区中发现了更多的正跨个体相关性,这表明该网络在患者中更具互联性。在导致不确定性的任务参数的决策中,强迫症患者与对照组没有差异。这些结果表明,强迫症患者在做出决策时,边缘/边缘系统脑区网络的过度激活,这可能导致该障碍的特征性更大的主观怀疑体验。