• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护理研究中的焦点小组:方法学视角。

Focus groups in nursing research: methodological perspectives.

机构信息

School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

出版信息

Nurs Outlook. 2012 Nov-Dec;60(6):411-6. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2012.02.001. Epub 2012 Mar 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.outlook.2012.02.001
PMID:22464693
Abstract

Focus groups have been increasingly used as a data collection method in nursing research. The key feature of focus groups is the active interaction among participants to explore their views and opinions. In this respect, focus groups are distinct from other methods such as Delphi groups, nominal groups, brainstorming, and consensus panels, which seek to determine a consensus between participants. Compared with other data collection methods, it can be concluded that the real strength of focus groups is not simply in exploring what participants have to say, but in providing insights into the sources of complex behaviors and motivations. The aim of this paper is to present an overview of the focus group as a research tool in nursing research, particularly in nursing education.

摘要

焦点小组已越来越多地被用作护理研究中的一种数据收集方法。焦点小组的关键特征是参与者之间的积极互动,以探讨他们的观点和意见。在这方面,焦点小组与其他方法(如 Delphi 小组、名义小组、头脑风暴和共识小组)不同,后者旨在确定参与者之间的共识。与其他数据收集方法相比,可以得出结论,焦点小组的真正优势不在于仅仅探讨参与者必须说什么,而在于深入了解复杂行为和动机的来源。本文旨在介绍焦点小组作为护理研究,特别是护理教育研究工具的概述。

相似文献

1
Focus groups in nursing research: methodological perspectives.护理研究中的焦点小组:方法学视角。
Nurs Outlook. 2012 Nov-Dec;60(6):411-6. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2012.02.001. Epub 2012 Mar 29.
2
Literature review: considerations in undertaking focus group research with culturally and linguistically diverse groups.文献综述:针对文化和语言背景各异群体开展焦点小组研究的注意事项
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Jun;16(6):1000-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01760.x.
3
Focus groups as a tool for critical social research in nurse education.焦点小组作为护理教育中批判性社会研究的一种工具。
Nurse Educ Today. 2001 May;21(4):323-33. doi: 10.1054/nedt.2001.0563.
4
Methodological tools for the collection and analysis of participant observation data using grounded theory.运用扎根理论收集和分析参与观察数据的方法工具。
Nurse Res. 2014 Nov;22(2):10-5. doi: 10.7748/nr.22.2.10.e1284.
5
Focus groups in nursing research: an appropriate method or the latest fad?
Nurse Res. 2007;14(2):18-24. doi: 10.7748/nr2007.01.14.2.18.c6018.
6
Insights into the use and complexities of the Policy Delphi technique.政策德尔菲技术的应用及复杂性洞察
Nurse Res. 2014 Jan;21(3):32-9. doi: 10.7748/nr2014.01.21.3.32.e342.
7
Pitfalls, perils and payments: service user, carers and teaching staff perceptions of the barriers to involvement in nursing education.陷阱、危险和报酬:服务使用者、护理人员和教学人员对参与护理教育的障碍的看法。
Nurse Educ Today. 2012 Oct;32(7):829-34. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2012.04.013. Epub 2012 May 15.
8
Planning and conducting focus group research with nurses.与护士一起规划和开展焦点小组研究。
Nurse Res. 2011;18(2):77-87. doi: 10.7748/nr2011.01.18.2.77.c8286.
9
Preparing for and conducting focus groups in nursing research: part 2.护理研究中焦点小组的准备与实施:第2部分。
Br J Nurs. 2013;22(3):170-3. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2013.22.3.170.
10
Focus group interviews as a tool for psychiatric nursing research.
Aust N Z J Ment Health Nurs. 1996 Mar;5(1):40-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Person-centred care of people living with dementia and its regulation in German-speaking nursing homes: A qualitative focus group study.德语区养老院中痴呆症患者的以人为本护理及其监管:一项定性焦点小组研究。
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2025 Aug 5;9:100400. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100400. eCollection 2025 Dec.
2
Assessing the impact of day programs on individuals living with dementia and their family/friend caregivers (AIDA-DemCare): protocol of a prospective cohort study combined with a qualitative evaluation.评估日间项目对痴呆症患者及其家庭/朋友照顾者的影响(AIDA-DemCare):一项结合定性评估的前瞻性队列研究方案
BMC Public Health. 2025 Aug 19;25(1):2846. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23896-6.
3
Exploring an Intervention to Enhance Positive Mental Health in People with First-Episode Psychosis: A Qualitative Study from the Perspective of Mental Health Professionals.
探索一种增强首发精神病患者积极心理健康的干预措施:一项从心理健康专业人员视角开展的定性研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 28;13(15):1834. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13151834.
4
Floristic composition, structure and regeneration status of trees as affected by agro-climatic variation in the Bale mountains national park, South-eastern Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚东南部巴勒山国家公园树木的植物区系组成、结构及更新状况受农业气候变异的影响
BMC Ecol Evol. 2025 Aug 4;25(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12862-025-02426-3.
5
Screening Intimate Partner Violence During Pregnancy in Maternity Clinics-Views of Finnish Public Health Nurses.在产科诊所筛查孕期亲密伴侣暴力行为——芬兰公共卫生护士的观点
Scand J Caring Sci. 2025 Sep;39(3):e70090. doi: 10.1111/scs.70090.
6
User-Driven Development of a Digital Behavioral Intervention for Chronic Pain: Multimethod Multiphase Study.慢性疼痛数字行为干预的用户驱动型开发:多方法多阶段研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jul 8;9:e74064. doi: 10.2196/74064.
7
Educating nurses on prioritization: insights from a mixed-methods study on unfinished nursing care.对护士进行优先排序教育:一项关于未完成护理工作的混合方法研究的见解
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 1;24(1):759. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03345-w.
8
Evaluating Nurses' Perceptions of Documentation in the Electronic Health Record: Multimethod Analysis.评估护士对电子健康记录中文件记录的认知:多方法分析
JMIR Nurs. 2025 Apr 28;8:e69651. doi: 10.2196/69651.
9
"How much more on the nurse?:" a qualitative analysis of inpatient nurses' perspectives on offering HIV testing.“护士方面还有多少工作要做?”:对住院护士提供艾滋病毒检测观点的定性分析
BMC Nurs. 2025 Mar 26;24(1):327. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-02845-z.
10
Connecting knowledge and practice: specialization course in dentistry in public health at Brazilian unified health system - a journey of transformative integration.连接知识与实践:巴西统一卫生系统中的牙科公共卫生专业课程——变革性整合之旅。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Mar 21;25(1):419. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06987-1.