• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评价实施俯卧折刀位对经腹会阴直肠切除术会阴部阶段的影响。

Evaluation of the impact of implementing the prone jackknife position for the perineal phase of abdominoperineal excision of the rectum.

机构信息

Academic Surgical Unit, University of Hull, Castle Hill Hospital, Cottingham, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 Mar;55(3):316-21. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31823e2424.

DOI:10.1097/DCR.0b013e31823e2424
PMID:22469799
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Abdominoperineal excision of rectum has been associated with poor oncological specimens and high local recurrence rates in comparison with restorative surgery. The role of recent changes in operative position has yet to be evaluated.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to determine whether a change in the perineal phase from the Lloyd-Davies position to the prone jackknife position might improve excision margins and oncological outcomes.

METHODS

A single-institution review of a prospectively maintained database comparing the quality of excision and oncological outcomes after abdominoperineal excision in conventional and prone position was performed. Consecutive abdominoperineal excisions performed for adenocarcinoma of the rectum between January 1999 and April 2008 were included.

RESULTS

Abdominoperineal excision cases were assessed including 63 in the Lloyd-Davies position and 58 in the prone jackknife position. The 5-year local recurrence rate was 5% in the prone jackknife group in comparison with 23% in the Lloyd-Davies group (p = 0.03) by life table analysis. For local recurrence, the most significant and independent risk factors were a favorable effect of having the patient in the prone jackknife position for the perineal phase of abdominoperineal excision (HR 0.2; 95% CI 0.04-0.81) and, unfavorably, a positive circumferential resection margin (HR 7.1; 95% CI 2.4-20). Lymph node involvement (N2) was an independent risk factor for overall survival (HR 4.6; 95% CI 2.1-9.5) and relapse of disease (HR 4.0; 95% CI 0.7-9.4).

LIMITATIONS

This study has some limitations because it is a retrospective review of a prospective database.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that the rate of local recurrence after abdominoperineal excision may be lowered by adaptation of the prone jackknife position.

摘要

背景

与保肛手术相比,腹会阴联合切除术的标本质量较差,局部复发率较高。手术体位的近期变化的作用尚未得到评估。

目的

本研究旨在确定会阴期从 Lloyd-Davies 体位改为俯卧位是否可以改善切缘和肿瘤学结果。

方法

对一家机构前瞻性维护的数据库进行回顾性分析,比较传统体位和俯卧位行腹会阴联合切除术后的切除质量和肿瘤学结果。纳入 1999 年 1 月至 2008 年 4 月连续进行的直肠腺癌腹会阴联合切除术病例。

结果

评估了 63 例 Lloyd-Davies 体位和 58 例俯卧位的腹会阴联合切除病例。通过生命表分析,俯卧位组的 5 年局部复发率为 5%,而 Lloyd-Davies 组为 23%(p = 0.03)。对于局部复发,最重要和独立的危险因素是患者在俯卧位进行腹会阴联合切除的会阴期(HR 0.2;95%CI 0.04-0.81),以及不利的是,阳性环周切缘(HR 7.1;95%CI 2.4-20)。淋巴结受累(N2)是总生存(HR 4.6;95%CI 2.1-9.5)和疾病复发(HR 4.0;95%CI 0.7-9.4)的独立危险因素。

局限性

本研究存在一些局限性,因为它是对前瞻性数据库的回顾性分析。

结论

这些数据表明,通过采用俯卧位,可能会降低腹会阴联合切除术后局部复发率。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the impact of implementing the prone jackknife position for the perineal phase of abdominoperineal excision of the rectum.评价实施俯卧折刀位对经腹会阴直肠切除术会阴部阶段的影响。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 Mar;55(3):316-21. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31823e2424.
2
Factors associated with oncologic outcomes after abdominoperineal resection compared with restorative resection for low rectal cancer: patient- and tumor-related or technical factors only?与保肛直肠切除术相比,腹会阴联合切除术治疗低位直肠癌的肿瘤学结局相关因素:仅与患者和肿瘤相关或与技术相关因素?
Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 Jan;55(1):51-8. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182351c1f.
3
Oncological outcomes after total mesorectal excision for cure for cancer of the lower rectum: anterior vs. abdominoperineal resection.低位直肠癌根治性全直肠系膜切除术后的肿瘤学结局:前切除术与腹会阴联合切除术的比较
Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Jan;47(1):48-58. doi: 10.1007/s10350-003-0012-y. Epub 2004 Jan 14.
4
Local recurrence after prone vs supine abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer.直肠癌前俯位与仰卧位腹会阴切除术的局部复发比较。
Colorectal Dis. 2013 Jul;15(7):812-5. doi: 10.1111/codi.12148.
5
Therapeutic results of abdominoperineal resection in the prone jackknife position for T3-4 low rectal cancers.俯卧折刀位下腹会阴联合切除术治疗T3-4期低位直肠癌的疗效
J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Mar;19(3):551-7. doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-2683-1. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
6
A 12-year experience of the Trendelenburg perineal approach for abdominoperineal resection.经会阴特伦德伦伯氏位行腹会阴联合切除术的12年经验
ANZ J Surg. 2013 Nov;83(11):853-8. doi: 10.1111/ans.12137. Epub 2013 Apr 17.
7
[Total excision of the mesorectum in cancer of the lower and middle rectum. Oncological and functional results].[中低位直肠癌的直肠系膜全切除。肿瘤学及功能学结果]
Chirurg. 2003 Feb;74(2):125-31. doi: 10.1007/s00104-002-0558-6.
8
Randomized clinical trial of conventional versus cylindrical abdominoperineal resection for locally advanced lower rectal cancer.随机对照临床试验:传统与柱状经腹会阴联合切除术治疗局部进展期低位直肠癌的比较
Am J Surg. 2012 Sep;204(3):274-82. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.05.001.
9
Evidence of the oncologic superiority of cylindrical abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer.柱状腹会阴联合切除术治疗低位直肠癌的肿瘤学优势证据。
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jul 20;26(21):3517-22. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.5961. Epub 2008 Jun 9.
10
Outcome of extralevator abdominoperineal excision compared with standard surgery: results from a single centre.腹会阴联合切除术后肛门外括约肌保留与标准手术的结果比较:单中心研究结果。
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Oct;14(10):1191-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.02930.x.

引用本文的文献

1
MRI navigation surgery for T4b rectal cancer using multiple minimally invasive surgical approaches.采用多种微创手术方法对T4b期直肠癌进行MRI导航手术。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025 Mar 14;40(1):66. doi: 10.1007/s00384-025-04838-5.
2
A tailored approach to abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer: multicentre analysis of short-term outcomes and impact on oncological survival.直肠癌腹会阴切除术的个体化方法:短期结局的多中心分析及其对肿瘤生存的影响。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 May;406(3):813-819. doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02122-y. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
3
Perioperative and oncological outcomes of abdominoperineal resection in the prone position vs the classic lithotomy position: A systematic review with meta-analysis.
俯卧位与经典截石位腹会阴联合切除术的围手术期及肿瘤学结局:一项荟萃分析的系统评价
J Surg Oncol. 2019 Jun;119(7):979-986. doi: 10.1002/jso.25402. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
4
Short-term Outcomes of an Extralevator Abdominoperineal Resection in the Prone Position Compared With a Conventional Abdominoperineal Resection for Advanced Low Rectal Cancer: The Early Experience at a Single Institution.与传统腹会阴联合切除术相比,俯卧位下经提肌外腹会阴联合切除术治疗晚期低位直肠癌的短期疗效:单中心早期经验
Ann Coloproctol. 2016 Feb;32(1):12-9. doi: 10.3393/ac.2016.32.1.12. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
5
Therapeutic results of abdominoperineal resection in the prone jackknife position for T3-4 low rectal cancers.俯卧折刀位下腹会阴联合切除术治疗T3-4期低位直肠癌的疗效
J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Mar;19(3):551-7. doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-2683-1. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
6
Results of extralevator abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer including quality of life and long-term wound complications.腹会阴联合切除术后肛门外括约肌保留低位直肠癌的疗效分析,包括生活质量和长期伤口并发症。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013 Apr;28(4):503-10. doi: 10.1007/s00384-012-1611-7. Epub 2012 Nov 21.