• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

俯卧折刀位下腹会阴联合切除术治疗T3-4期低位直肠癌的疗效

Therapeutic results of abdominoperineal resection in the prone jackknife position for T3-4 low rectal cancers.

作者信息

Hu Xiang, Cao Liang, Zhang Jian, Liang Pin, Liu Ge

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Dalian Medical University, No. 222 Zhongshan Road, Dalian, 116011, China,

出版信息

J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Mar;19(3):551-7. doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-2683-1. Epub 2014 Nov 4.

DOI:10.1007/s11605-014-2683-1
PMID:25367808
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the therapeutic results of abdominoperineal resections in the prone jackknife position for T3-4 low rectal cancers.

METHODS

From January 2002 to January 2011, 536 patients with T3-T4 low rectal cancer underwent abdominoperineal resection. Two hundred forty-three were treated in the Lloyd-Davies position and 293 in the prone jackknife position. Clinicopathological data and survival of the two groups were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Abdominoperineal resections in the prone jackknife position group were associated with significantly less blood loss (124 ± 50.68 vs 210.67 ± 83.32 ml, P < 0.001) and shorter operation times (3.10 ± 1.08 vs 3.82 ± 1.43 h, p = 0.010) than those in Lloyd-Davies position group. The total local recurrence rate is 8.4 % (45/536). The local recurrence rate in the prone jackknife position group was significantly lower than in the Lloyd-Davies position group (5.5 vs 11.9 %, P < 0.001). By multivariate regression analysis, depth of tumor invasion (P = 0.032), CRM (P < 0.001), and position (P = 0.015) were found to be independent risk factors for local recurrence. Multivariate Cox regression survival analysis, lymph node metastasis, and CRM (P < 0.001) were proven to be the major independent prognostic factors for T3-T4 low rectal cancer patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Abdominoperineal resection in the prone jackknife position for T3-T4 low rectal cancers is feasible and has a lower local recurrence.

摘要

目的

评估俯卧折刀位下行腹会阴联合切除术治疗T3 - 4期低位直肠癌的疗效。

方法

2002年1月至2011年1月,536例T3 - T4期低位直肠癌患者接受了腹会阴联合切除术。其中243例采用Lloyd - Davies体位治疗,293例采用俯卧折刀位治疗。对两组患者的临床病理资料及生存情况进行回顾性分析。

结果

与Lloyd - Davies体位组相比,俯卧折刀位组腹会阴联合切除术的失血量明显更少(124±50.68 vs 210.67±83.32 ml,P < 0.001),手术时间更短(3.10±1.08 vs 3.82±1.43 h,p = 0.010)。总局部复发率为8.4%(45/536)。俯卧折刀位组的局部复发率明显低于Lloyd - Davies体位组(5.5% vs 11.9%,P < 0.001)。多因素回归分析发现,肿瘤浸润深度(P = 0.032)、环周切缘(CRM,P < 0.001)及体位(P = 0.015)是局部复发的独立危险因素。多因素Cox回归生存分析表明,淋巴结转移和CRM(P < 0.001)是T3 - T4期低位直肠癌患者主要的独立预后因素。

结论

T3 - T4期低位直肠癌采用俯卧折刀位行腹会阴联合切除术是可行的,且局部复发率较低。

相似文献

1
Therapeutic results of abdominoperineal resection in the prone jackknife position for T3-4 low rectal cancers.俯卧折刀位下腹会阴联合切除术治疗T3-4期低位直肠癌的疗效
J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Mar;19(3):551-7. doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-2683-1. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
2
Evaluation of the impact of implementing the prone jackknife position for the perineal phase of abdominoperineal excision of the rectum.评价实施俯卧折刀位对经腹会阴直肠切除术会阴部阶段的影响。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 Mar;55(3):316-21. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31823e2424.
3
Better operative outcomes achieved with the prone jackknife vs. lithotomy position during abdominoperineal resection in patients with low rectal cancer.在低位直肠癌患者的腹会阴联合切除术中,俯卧折刀位与截石位相比可获得更好的手术效果。
World J Surg Oncol. 2015 Feb 12;13:39. doi: 10.1186/s12957-015-0453-5.
4
Randomized clinical trial of conventional versus cylindrical abdominoperineal resection for locally advanced lower rectal cancer.随机对照临床试验:传统与柱状经腹会阴联合切除术治疗局部进展期低位直肠癌的比较
Am J Surg. 2012 Sep;204(3):274-82. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.05.001.
5
Factors associated with oncologic outcomes after abdominoperineal resection compared with restorative resection for low rectal cancer: patient- and tumor-related or technical factors only?与保肛直肠切除术相比,腹会阴联合切除术治疗低位直肠癌的肿瘤学结局相关因素:仅与患者和肿瘤相关或与技术相关因素?
Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 Jan;55(1):51-8. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182351c1f.
6
Local recurrence after prone vs supine abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer.直肠癌前俯位与仰卧位腹会阴切除术的局部复发比较。
Colorectal Dis. 2013 Jul;15(7):812-5. doi: 10.1111/codi.12148.
7
Laparoscopic-assisted abdominoperineal resection in the prone position. An alternative technique.
Surg Endosc. 1997 Jun;11(6):684-6. doi: 10.1007/s004649900423.
8
Risk factors for adverse outcome in patients with rectal cancer treated with an abdominoperineal resection in the total mesorectal excision trial.全直肠系膜切除试验中接受腹会阴联合切除术治疗的直肠癌患者不良结局的危险因素。
Ann Surg. 2007 Jul;246(1):83-90. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000259432.29056.9d.
9
Oncological outcomes after total mesorectal excision for cure for cancer of the lower rectum: anterior vs. abdominoperineal resection.低位直肠癌根治性全直肠系膜切除术后的肿瘤学结局:前切除术与腹会阴联合切除术的比较
Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Jan;47(1):48-58. doi: 10.1007/s10350-003-0012-y. Epub 2004 Jan 14.
10
Laparoscopic vs open abdominoperineal resection in the multimodality management of low rectal cancers.腹腔镜与开放腹会阴联合切除术在低位直肠癌多模式治疗中的应用比较
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Sep 21;21(35):10174-83. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i35.10174.

引用本文的文献

1
Perioperative and oncological outcomes of abdominoperineal resection in the prone position vs the classic lithotomy position: A systematic review with meta-analysis.俯卧位与经典截石位腹会阴联合切除术的围手术期及肿瘤学结局:一项荟萃分析的系统评价
J Surg Oncol. 2019 Jun;119(7):979-986. doi: 10.1002/jso.25402. Epub 2019 Feb 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Prone jackknife position is not necessary to achieve a cylindrical abdominoperineal resection: demonstration of the lithotomy position.俯卧折刀位并非实现圆柱形经腹会阴切除术所必需:截石位的演示。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Feb;57(2):251. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000047.
2
Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy in stage T3, N0 rectal cancer.T3期N0直肠癌术前与术后放化疗的比较
Int J Clin Oncol. 2014 Oct;19(5):889-96. doi: 10.1007/s10147-013-0636-4. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
3
Short-term follow-up after laparoscopic versus conventional total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer in a large teaching hospital.
在一家大型教学医院中,腹腔镜与传统全直肠系膜切除术治疗低位直肠癌的短期随访结果。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014 Jan;29(1):117-25. doi: 10.1007/s00384-013-1768-8. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
4
Comparison of tumor recurrence between laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with sphincter preservation and laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer.腹腔镜全系膜切除术保肛与腹腔镜腹会阴联合切除术治疗低位直肠癌的肿瘤复发比较。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Sep;27(9):3452-64. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-2898-3. Epub 2013 Mar 19.
5
Randomized clinical trial of conventional versus cylindrical abdominoperineal resection for locally advanced lower rectal cancer.随机对照临床试验:传统与柱状经腹会阴联合切除术治疗局部进展期低位直肠癌的比较
Am J Surg. 2012 Sep;204(3):274-82. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.05.001.
6
Preoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil and oxaliplatin versus fluorouracil alone in locally advanced rectal cancer: initial results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-04 randomised phase 3 trial.局部进展期直肠癌的术前放化疗和术后氟尿嘧啶与奥沙利铂联合化疗与单纯氟尿嘧啶化疗的比较:德国 CAO/ARO/AIO-04 随机 3 期临床试验的初步结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Jul;13(7):679-87. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70187-0. Epub 2012 May 23.
7
Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-94 randomized phase III trial after a median follow-up of 11 years.局部进展期直肠癌术前与术后放化疗的比较:中位随访 11 年后德国 CAO/ARO/AIO-94 随机 III 期临床试验结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jun 1;30(16):1926-33. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.40.1836. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
8
Evaluation of the impact of implementing the prone jackknife position for the perineal phase of abdominoperineal excision of the rectum.评价实施俯卧折刀位对经腹会阴直肠切除术会阴部阶段的影响。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 Mar;55(3):316-21. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31823e2424.
9
Focus on extralevator perineal dissection in supine position for low rectal cancer has led to better quality of surgery and oncologic outcome.关注仰卧位低位直肠癌的超低位会阴切开术,可提高手术质量和肿瘤学结果。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Mar;19(3):786-93. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-2004-9. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
10
Prone or lithotomy positioning during an abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer results in comparable oncologic outcomes.直肠癌腹会阴切除术采用俯卧或截石位,其肿瘤学结果相当。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Aug;54(8):939-46. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318221eb64.