• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于疟疾诊断的诊断型疟疾试纸条检测(抗原检测法)评估。

Evaluation of Diagnos Malaria Stix test (antigen detection assay) for diagnosis of malaria.

作者信息

Khan Haris M, Shujatullah Fatima, Shahid M, Raza Adil, Malik Ritu

机构信息

Dept. of Microbiology, J.N. Medical College, Aligarh, UP.

出版信息

J Commun Dis. 2010 Jun;42(2):153-6.

PMID:22471175
Abstract

Malaria is one of the most common parasitic infection in India. The diagnosis largely depends on peripheral blood smear examination. Newer diagnostic methods like various antigen detection assays are now in use for prompt diagnosis and treatment. This study was done to determine the effectiveness of Diagnos Malaria Stix (antigen detection) assay in diagnosis of malaria. This involves detection of PfHRP-2 antigen and P.V. specific pLDH antigen. 162 patients with signs and symptoms of malaria included in the study. Leishman stained blood smear examination was done for all patients. Commercially available Diagnos Malaria Stix assay was used. Diagnos Malaria Stix showed sensitivity, specificity positive and negative predictive values of 100% each while Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of Leishman stained blood smear examination were 45.45%, 100%, 100% and 92% respectively.

摘要

疟疾是印度最常见的寄生虫感染之一。诊断很大程度上依赖于外周血涂片检查。各种抗原检测分析等更新的诊断方法目前用于快速诊断和治疗。本研究旨在确定诊断疟疾试纸条(抗原检测)分析在疟疾诊断中的有效性。这涉及检测PfHRP - 2抗原和间日疟原虫特异性pLDH抗原。162名有疟疾症状和体征的患者纳入研究。对所有患者进行利什曼染色血涂片检查。使用市售的诊断疟疾试纸条分析。诊断疟疾试纸条的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值均为100%,而利什曼染色血涂片检查的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值分别为45.45%、100%、100%和92%。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Diagnos Malaria Stix test (antigen detection assay) for diagnosis of malaria.用于疟疾诊断的诊断型疟疾试纸条检测(抗原检测法)评估。
J Commun Dis. 2010 Jun;42(2):153-6.
2
Field trial of the RTM dipstick method for the rapid diagnosis of malaria based on the detection of Plasmodium falciparum HRP-2 antigen in whole blood.基于检测全血中恶性疟原虫HRP-2抗原的RTM试纸法快速诊断疟疾的现场试验。
Trop Doct. 2001 Jan;31(1):19-21.
3
Rapid diagnosis of falciparum malaria by detection of Plasmodium falciparum HRP-2 antigen.通过检测恶性疟原虫HRP-2抗原快速诊断恶性疟。
J Assoc Physicians India. 1999 Nov;47(11):1076-8.
4
Rapid immunochromatography-based detection of mixed-species malaria infection in Pakistan.基于快速免疫层析法检测巴基斯坦的混合物种疟疾感染情况。
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2005 May;36(3):562-4.
5
[Serum HRP-2 antigens and imported Plasmodium falciparum malaria: comparison of ParaSight-F and ICT malaria P.f].[血清HRP - 2抗原与输入性恶性疟原虫疟疾:ParaSight - F和ICT疟疾P.f检测方法的比较]
Med Trop (Mars). 1997;57(4):353-6.
6
Evaluation of Paracheck pf o and Parascreen pan/pf o tests for the diagnosis of malaria in an endemic area, South Ethiopia.在埃塞俄比亚南部疟疾流行地区对Paracheck pf o和Parascreen pan/pf o检测用于疟疾诊断的评估。
Ethiop Med J. 2008 Oct;46(4):375-81.
7
Evaluation of a rapid diagnostic test specific for Plasmodium vivax.间日疟原虫特异性快速诊断检测的评估
Trop Med Int Health. 2008 Dec;13(12):1495-500. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2008.02163.x. Epub 2008 Oct 6.
8
Cross-reactivity in rapid diagnostic tests between human malaria and zoonotic simian malaria parasite Plasmodium knowlesi infections.人类疟疾与动物源性猿类疟原虫诺氏疟原虫感染在快速诊断检测中的交叉反应性。
Parasitol Int. 2009 Sep;58(3):300-2. doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2009.06.004. Epub 2009 Jun 13.
9
[Comparison between OptiMAL and the thick smear tests for malaria diagnosis in an endemic area during a non-epidemic period].[非流行期某疟疾流行地区OptiMAL与厚涂片法疟疾诊断的比较]
Biomedica. 2002 Dec;22(4):466-75.
10
Comparison of different diagnostic techniques in Plasmodium falciparum cerebral malaria.恶性疟原虫所致脑型疟疾不同诊断技术的比较
J Vector Borne Dis. 2006 Dec;43(4):186-90.

引用本文的文献

1
Convolutional neural networks to automate the screening of malaria in low-resource countries.卷积神经网络助力低资源国家疟疾筛查自动化。
PeerJ. 2020 Aug 4;8:e9674. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9674. eCollection 2020.