Verhoef C G, Verbeek A L, Stalpers L J, van Daal W A
Sint Radboudziekenhuis, afd. Radiotherapie, Nijmegen.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1990 Nov 10;134(45):2195-200.
In clinical decision analysis a quantitative value is attached to a longevity or a life quality by means of utility assessment. The actual value of the utility can determine the result of the decision analysis. In this article utility theory is briefly discussed. Four kinds of utility tests (direct scaling methods, the basic reference gamble, the time trade-off test and additive conjoint measurement) are introduced on the basis of an example and their pros and cons are discussed. It is concluded that additive conjoint measurement has the best formal infrastructure, but that the test method is not always easily applicable.
在临床决策分析中,通过效用评估为寿命或生活质量赋予一个定量值。效用的实际值可以决定决策分析的结果。本文简要讨论了效用理论。基于一个示例介绍了四种效用测试(直接标度法、基本参考赌博法、时间权衡测试法和加法联合测量法),并讨论了它们的优缺点。得出的结论是,加法联合测量法具有最佳的形式结构,但该测试方法并不总是易于应用。