Heller M A, Kennedy J M
Winston-Salem State University, NC 27110.
Percept Psychophys. 1990 Nov;48(5):459-66. doi: 10.3758/bf03211590.
Congenitally blind, late blind, and blindfolded sighted controls attempted a Piagetian perspective-taking (three-mountain) task. Piaget used the term perspective to mean point of view (Piaget & Inhelder, 1967, p. 210), and the present usage does not imply linear perspective. Subjects used raised-line drawings to depict alternative points of view of an array of three geometric solid forms (cube, cone, and ball). They then identified the point of view of raised-line drawings. The effect of visual status on accuracy was nonsignificant for both response measures. Using alternating vision of the array and drawings, sighted subjects in a control condition performed like the congenitally blind. However, congenitally blind individuals did require more time than the other subjects for the perspective-taking task. In an additional experiment, no difference was found between the three groups in the accuracy or speed of tactile shape matching. The results suggest that visual imagery and visual experience are not necessary for tactile perspective taking.
先天性失明者、后天失明者以及蒙眼的视力正常对照组尝试完成一项皮亚杰式的观点采择(三山)任务。皮亚杰使用“观点”一词来表示视角(皮亚杰和英海尔德,1967年,第210页),且此处的用法并不意味着线性透视。受试者使用凸起线条图来描绘由三种几何立体形状(立方体、圆锥体和球体)组成的阵列的不同视角。然后,他们识别凸起线条图的视角。对于两种反应测量指标,视觉状态对准确性的影响均不显著。在交替观察阵列和图形的情况下,处于对照条件的视力正常受试者的表现与先天性失明者相似。然而,先天性失明个体在完成观点采择任务时确实比其他受试者需要更多时间。在另一项实验中,三组在触觉形状匹配的准确性或速度方面未发现差异。结果表明,触觉观点采择并不需要视觉表象和视觉经验。