Heller M A, Kennedy J M, Joyner T D
Winston-Salem State University, NC 27110, USA.
Perception. 1995;24(9):1049-58. doi: 10.1068/p241049.
Subjects were exposed to a three-dimensional model of a house and were asked to draw it using a raised-line drawing kit. Independent groups of ten each of sighted controls, early-blind, and late-blind subjects were told to identify the vantage point of tangible pictures of the model, including side views, 'bird's-eye' views from above, and views involving linear perspective. The ease or difficulty of picture interpretation depended upon the nature of the tangible drawing, with much better performance being recorded for side views. Performance was poor for foreshortened 3/4 views. Early-blind subjects were particularly unlikely to recognize views from above. In a control experiment with blindfolded sighted subjects the influence of prior information was examined: some subjects were told that the drawings could consist of side view or bird's-eye, top view, or 3/4 view drawings. This experiment showed that performance can be greatly improved through prior information about the nature of the tangible pictures.
受试者被展示了一个房屋的三维模型,并被要求使用凸线绘图工具包将其绘制出来。分别由十名视力正常的对照组、早期失明者和晚期失明者组成的独立小组,被要求识别该模型实体图片的观察点,包括侧视图、从上方的“鸟瞰”视图以及涉及线性透视的视图。图片解读的难易程度取决于实体绘图的性质,侧视图的表现要比其他视图好得多。对于缩短的3/4视图,表现较差。早期失明的受试者尤其不太可能识别从上方的视图。在一项对蒙住眼睛的视力正常受试者进行的对照实验中,研究了先验信息的影响:一些受试者被告知这些绘图可能是侧视图、鸟瞰图、顶视图或3/4视图绘图。该实验表明,通过关于实体图片性质的先验信息,表现可以得到极大改善。