Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Public Health Nutr. 2012 Jul;15(7):1159-67. doi: 10.1017/S1368980012000572. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
To evaluate the implementation of a controlled, 6-week, environmental and educational intervention to improve dietary intake and body composition, and to study the association of implementation fidelity with diet and body composition outcomes.
A process evaluation documented participation, dose of nutrition education delivered, participant satisfaction, fidelity and completeness of the food environment intervention implementation, and context through observations and interviews with staff and residents. Intervention sites were scored and categorized as high or low participation and implementation and compared on essential elements of the food environment and on diet and body composition outcomes.
Six urban residential drug-treatment facilities in Upstate New York.
Fifty-five primarily black and white men in residential drug-treatment programmes.
Participants were exposed to 94 % and 69 % of the educational and environmental elements, respectively. High implementation sites were significantly more likely to provide water and 100 % juice, offer fruit or vegetable salad, offer choices of fruits and vegetables, and limit fried foods. Mixed-model analysis of covariance revealed that participants in the high participation and implementation sites reported greater reductions in total energy, percentage of energy from sweets, daily servings of fats, oils and sweets, and BMI over the intervention period. Participants in low participation and implementation sites reported greater reductions in percentage of energy from fat. Differential implementation of environmental elements limited the intervention impact.
These findings document the contribution of changes in eating environments to facilitate dietary behaviour change in community residential substance-abuse settings.
评估为期 6 周的环境和教育干预措施的实施情况,以改善饮食摄入和身体成分,并研究实施保真度与饮食和身体成分结果的关系。
通过对员工和居民的观察和访谈,记录参与度、提供的营养教育剂量、参与者满意度、食品环境干预实施的保真度和完整性以及背景情况,对实施情况进行了过程评估。干预地点根据参与度和实施度进行评分和分类,分为高参与度和高实施度或低参与度和低实施度,并比较其食品环境的基本要素以及饮食和身体成分的结果。
纽约州北部的六家城市住宅戒毒治疗机构。
55 名主要为黑人和白人的住宅戒毒治疗项目男性参与者。
参与者分别接触到 94%和 69%的教育和环境元素。高实施度的地点更有可能提供水和 100%果汁、水果或蔬菜沙拉、提供水果和蔬菜的选择以及限制油炸食品。混合模型协方差分析显示,在干预期间,高参与度和实施度地点的参与者报告了总能量、来自甜食的能量百分比、每日脂肪、油和甜食的摄入量以及 BMI 的更大降幅。低参与度和实施度地点的参与者报告了来自脂肪的能量百分比的更大降幅。环境元素的实施差异限制了干预的效果。
这些发现证明了饮食环境的变化有助于促进社区住宅药物滥用环境中的饮食行为改变。