Child and Reproductive Health Group, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
J Infect Dis. 2012 May 15;205 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S209-15. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jir879. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
Confirming the diagnosis of childhood tuberculosis is a major challenge. However, research on childhood tuberculosis as it relates to better diagnostics is often neglected because of technical difficulties, such as the slow growth in culture, the difficulty of obtaining specimens, and the diverse and relatively nonspecific clinical presentation of tuberculosis in this age group. Researchers often use individually designed criteria for enrollment, diagnostic classifications, and reference standards, thereby hindering the interpretation and comparability of their findings. The development of standardized research approaches and definitions is therefore needed to strengthen the evaluation of new diagnostics for detection and confirmation of tuberculosis in children. In this article we present consensus statements on methodological issues for conducting research of Tuberculosis diagnostics among children, with a focus on intrathoracic tuberculosis. The statements are complementary to a clinical research case definition presented in an accompanying publication and suggest a phased approach to diagnostics evaluation; entry criteria for enrollment; methods for classification of disease certainty, including the rational use of culture within the case definition; age categories and comorbidities for reporting results; and the need to use standard operating procedures. Special consideration is given to the performance of microbiological culture in children and we also recommend for alternative methodological approaches to report findings in a standardized manner to overcome these limitations are made. This consensus statement is an important step toward ensuring greater rigor and comparability of pediatric tuberculosis diagnostic research, with the aim of realizing the full potential of better tests for children.
确诊儿童结核病是一项重大挑战。然而,由于技术困难,如培养物生长缓慢、获取标本困难以及该年龄段结核病临床表现多样且相对非特异性,因此,针对更好的诊断方法的儿童结核病研究往往被忽视。研究人员通常使用单独设计的纳入标准、诊断分类和参考标准,从而阻碍了对其发现的解释和比较。因此,需要制定标准化的研究方法和定义,以加强对新诊断方法的评估,用于检测和确认儿童结核病。在本文中,我们提出了有关儿童结核病诊断研究中开展研究的方法学问题的共识声明,重点是胸内结核病。这些声明是对伴随出版物中提出的临床研究病例定义的补充,并建议采用分阶段方法进行诊断评估;纳入标准;疾病确定性分类方法,包括在病例定义内合理使用培养;用于报告结果的年龄类别和合并症;以及使用标准操作程序的必要性。特别考虑了儿童微生物培养的性能,我们还建议采用替代方法学方法以标准化方式报告发现,以克服这些局限性。这项共识声明是确保儿童结核病诊断研究更严格和更具可比性的重要步骤,旨在充分发挥更好的儿童检测方法的潜力。