Joels C S, Matthews B D, Kercher K W, Austin C, Norton H J, Williams T C, Heniford B T
Department of General Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, 1000 Blythe Boulevard, Charlotte, NC 28203, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2005 Jun;19(6):780-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-8927-5. Epub 2005 Mar 23.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate fixation methods for polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) mesh with an in vivo model of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.
In 40 New Zealand white rabbits, a 4 x 4-cm ePTFE mesh (n = 80, two per animal) was attached to an intact peritoneum with polyglactin 910 (PG 910) (n = 20) or polypropylene (PP) (n = 20) suture, titanium spiral tacks (TS) (n = 20), or nitinol anchors (NA) (n = 20). Mesh was harvested at 8 and 16 weeks for fixation strength testing, adhesion assessment, and collagen (hydroxyproline) content. Fixation strength on day 0 was determined with mesh attached to harvested abdominal wall. Statistical significance was determined as p < 0.05.
There was no difference in fixation strength between PP (39.1 N) and PG 910 (40.0 N) sutures at time zero. At week 8, PP (25.7 N) was significantly stronger (p < 0.05) than PG 910 (11.4 N) suture, but not at week 16. The fixation strength of TS and NA (day 0, 15.4 vs 7.4 N; week 8, 17.5 vs 15.3 N; week 16, 19.1 vs 13.8 N) was not significantly different. Fixation with PP suture was significantly (p < 0.05) stronger than that with TS and NA at day 0 (39.1, 15.4, and 7.4 N, respectively) but not at weeks 8 or 16. The fixation strength of suture decreased significantly (p < 0.05) from day 0 to week 16 (PP: day 0 = 39.1 N, week 8 = 25.7 N, week 16 = 21.4 N; PG 910: day 0 = 40.0 N, week 8 = 11.4 N, week 16 = 12.8 N). The fixation strength of NA and TS did not change significantly (NA: day 0 = 7.4 N, week 8 = 15.3 N, week 16 = 13.8 N; TS: week 0 = 15.4 N, week 8 = 17.5 N, week 16 = 19.1 N). There were no differences in adhesion area based on fixation device used; however, there were more (p < 0.05) mesh samples using NA with adhesions compared to TS and adhesion tenacity was greater (p < 0.05) compared to that of TS, PP, and PG. Hydroxyproline content at weeks 8 and 16 was similar for all fixation devices.
The initial fixation strength for nonabsorbable suture is significantly greater than that of the metallic fixation devices, but after 8 weeks there is no difference. Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair without transabdominal suture fixation may be predisposed to acute failure. The metallic devices have similar fixation strength, although the incidence of adhesions and tenacity of adhesions appear to be greater with the nitinol anchors. Since these devices have similar fixation strengths and most likely provide adequate supplementation to transabdominal sutures for mesh fixation after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair, their use should be based on other factors, such as their propensity for adhesions, ease of application, and cost.
本研究旨在通过腹腔镜腹疝修补的体内模型评估聚四氟乙烯(ePTFE)补片的固定方法。
在40只新西兰白兔中,将一块4×4厘米的ePTFE补片(n = 80,每只动物两片)用聚乙醇酸910(PG 910)(n = 20)或聚丙烯(PP)(n = 20)缝线、钛螺旋钉(TS)(n = 20)或镍钛合金锚钉(NA)(n = 20)固定于完整的腹膜上。在第8周和第16周取出补片进行固定强度测试、粘连评估和胶原蛋白(羟脯氨酸)含量测定。第0天时,将补片固定于取出的腹壁上测定固定强度。以p < 0.05为差异有统计学意义。
第0天时,PP缝线(39.1 N)和PG 910缝线(40.0 N)的固定强度无差异。在第8周时,PP缝线(25.7 N)显著强于PG 910缝线(11.4 N)(p < 0.05),但在第16周时无此差异。TS和NA的固定强度(第0天,15.4对7.4 N;第8周,17.5对15.3 N;第16周,19.1对13.8 N)无显著差异。第0天时,PP缝线固定显著强于TS和NA(分别为39.1、15.4和7.4 N)(p < 0.05),但在第8周或第16周时无此差异。缝线的固定强度从第0天到第16周显著降低(p < 0.05)(PP:第0天 = 39.1 N,第8周 = 25.7 N,第16周 = 21.4 N;PG 910:第0天 = 40.0 N,第8周 = 11.4 N,第16周 = 12.8 N)。NA和TS的固定强度无显著变化(NA:第0天 = 7.4 N,第8周 = 15.3 N,第16周 = 13.8 N;TS:第0周 = 15.4 N,第8周 = 17.5 N,第16周 = 19.1 N)。基于所用固定装置的粘连面积无差异;然而,与TS相比,使用NA的补片粘连样本更多(p < 0.05),且粘连韧性大于TS、PP和PG(p < 0.05)。所有固定装置在第8周和第16周时的羟脯氨酸含量相似。
不可吸收缝线的初始固定强度显著大于金属固定装置,但8周后无差异。无经腹缝线固定的腹腔镜腹疝修补可能易发生急性失败。金属装置的固定强度相似,尽管镍钛合金锚钉的粘连发生率和粘连韧性似乎更高。由于这些装置的固定强度相似,且很可能为腹腔镜腹疝修补术后补片固定的经腹缝线提供足够的补充,其使用应基于其他因素,如粘连倾向、应用难易程度和成本。