Suppr超能文献

阳性 PAT 试验对 Behcet 病分类/诊断标准的影响。

Impact of the positive pathergy test on the performance of classification/diagnosis criteria for Behcet's disease.

机构信息

Behcet's Disease Unit, Rheumatology Research Center, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Jalal Al Ahmad/Kargar Avenue, 14117, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Mod Rheumatol. 2013 Jan;23(1):125-32. doi: 10.1007/s10165-012-0626-9. Epub 2012 Apr 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The only diagnostic test that currently exists for Behcet's disease (BD) is the pathergy test. A positive pathergy test (PPT) is an important component of many of the 16 sets of classification/diagnosis criteria used to diagnose BD. The aim of this study was to determine the importance of a PTT in the performance of the diagnosis/classification criteria for BD.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients listed in the BD registry of the Rheumatology Research Center, Tehran (6,727) and 4,648 BD controls were enrolled in the study. The diagnosis was clinical when no other diagnosis could explain the patient's manifestations. The criteria were tested with and without PPT results. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated.

RESULTS

Without PPT, all sets of criteria lost sensitivity, gained specificity, and lost accuracy, with the exception of the Cheng-Zhang criteria. The largest loss in sensitivity was for the Hubault-Hamza (35 %) and Dilsen (17.3 %) criteria; the least was for the Curth (1.9 %) and ICBD (6.5 %) criteria. The largest gain on specificity was for the Dilsen (4.7 %) and Curth (3.1 %) criteria; the least was for the Japan (0.1 %) and Japan revised (0.1 %) criteria. The greatest loss in accuracy was for the Hubault-Hamza (20.4 %) and Dilsen revised (9.3 %) criteria; the least was for the ICBD (3.6 %), while Curth gained 0.3 %.

CONCLUSION

Without PPT as a criterion for the diagnosis of BD, the sensitivity and accuracy of the sets of classification/diagnosis criteria decrease, while the specificity improves.

摘要

背景

目前唯一存在的用于诊断白塞病(BD)的诊断测试是 PATHERGY 测试。阳性 PATHERGY 测试(PPT)是许多用于诊断 BD 的 16 套分类/诊断标准中的重要组成部分。本研究旨在确定 PTT 在 BD 诊断/分类标准表现中的重要性。

患者和方法

所有在德黑兰风湿病研究中心的 BD 注册处列出的患者(6727 名)和 4648 名 BD 对照者均纳入本研究。当没有其他诊断可以解释患者的表现时,采用临床诊断。该标准有和没有 PPT 结果进行了测试。计算了敏感性、特异性和准确性。

结果

没有 PPT,所有标准集的敏感性均降低,特异性均升高,准确性均降低,除 Cheng-Zhang 标准外。Hubault-Hamza(35%)和 Dilsen(17.3%)标准的敏感性下降最大;Curth(1.9%)和 ICBD(6.5%)标准的敏感性下降最小。特异性增加最大的是 Dilsen(4.7%)和 Curth(3.1%)标准;日本(0.1%)和日本修订版(0.1%)标准的特异性增加最小。准确性下降最大的是 Hubault-Hamza(20.4%)和 Dilsen 修订版(9.3%)标准;ICBD(3.6%)的准确性下降最小,而 Curth 增加了 0.3%。

结论

没有 PPT 作为 BD 诊断的标准,分类/诊断标准集的敏感性和准确性降低,而特异性提高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验