Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, E01.132, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Dec;28(8):2099-108. doi: 10.1007/s10554-012-0041-5. Epub 2012 Apr 5.
Multislice CT evaluation of prosthetic heart valves (PHV) is limited by PHV-related artifacts. We assessed the influence of different kV settings, a metal artifact reduction filter (MARF) and an iterative reconstruction algorithm (IR) on PHV-induced artifacts in an in vitro model. A Medtronic-Hall tilting disc and St Jude bileafet PHV were imaged using a 64-slice scanner with 100 kV/165 mAs, 120 kV/100 mAs, 140 kV/67 mAs at an equal CTDI(vol). Images were reconstructed with (1) filtered back projection (FBP), (2) IR, (3) MARF and (4) MARF and IR. Hypo- and hyperdense artifacts volumes (mean mm(3) ± SD) were quantified with 2 thresholds (≤-50 and ≥175 Hounsfield Units). Image noise was measured and the presence of secondary artifacts was scored by 2 observers independently. Mean hypodense artifacts for the Medtronic-Hall/St Jude valve (FBP) were 966 ± 23/1,738 ± 21 at 100 kV, 610 ± 13/991 ± 12 at 120 kV, and 420 ± 9/634 ± 9 at 140 kV. Compared to FBP, hypodense artifact reductions for IR were 9/8 %, 10/7 % and 12/6 % respectively, for MARF 92 %/84 %, 89/81 % and 86/77 % respectively; for MARF + IR 94/85 %, 92/82 %, and 90/79 % respectively. Mean hyperdense artifacts for the Medtronic-Hall/St Jude valve were 5,530 ± 48/6,940 ± 70 at 100 kV, 5,120 ± 42/6,250 ± 53 at 120 kV, and 5,011 ± 52/6,000 ± 0 at 140 kV. Reductions for IR were 2/2 %, 2/3 % and 3/4 % respectively, for MARF were 9/30 %, 0/25 %, 5/22 % respectively, MARF + IR 12/32 %, 4/27 % and 7/25 % respectively. Secondary artifacts were found in all MARF images. Image noise was reduced in the IR images. In vitro PHV-related artifacts can be reduced by increasing kV despite maintaining identical CTDI(vol). Although MARF is more effective than IR, it induces secondary artifacts.
多层螺旋 CT 评估人工心脏瓣膜(PHV)受到 PHV 相关伪影的限制。我们评估了不同管电压设置、金属伪影减少滤波器(MARF)和迭代重建算法(IR)对体外模型中 PHV 引起的伪影的影响。使用 64 层扫描仪对美敦力-霍尔倾斜盘和圣犹达双叶 PHV 进行成像,管电压分别为 100 kV/165 mAs、120 kV/100 mAs 和 140 kV/67 mAs,CTDI(vol)相同。使用(1)滤波反投影(FBP)、(2)IR、(3)MARF 和(4)MARF 和 IR 对图像进行重建。使用 2 个阈值(≤-50 和≥175 亨氏单位)定量测量低和高密度伪影体积(平均 mm(3) ± SD)。由 2 名观察者独立测量图像噪声并评分次要伪影。美敦力-霍尔/圣犹达瓣膜(FBP)的平均低密度伪影在 100 kV 时为 966 ± 23/1738 ± 21,在 120 kV 时为 610 ± 13/991 ± 12,在 140 kV 时为 420 ± 9/634 ± 9。与 FBP 相比,IR 的低密度伪影减少分别为 9/8%、10/7%和 12/6%,MARF 分别为 92/84%、89/81%和 86/77%;MARF+IR 分别为 94/85%、92/82%和 90/79%。美敦力-霍尔/圣犹达瓣膜的平均高密度伪影在 100 kV 时为 5530 ± 48/6940 ± 70,在 120 kV 时为 5120 ± 42/6250 ± 53,在 140 kV 时为 5011 ± 52/6000 ± 0。IR 的减少分别为 2/2%、2/3%和 3/4%,MARF 分别为 9/30%、0/25%、5/22%,MARF+IR 分别为 12/32%、4/27%和 7/25%。所有 MARF 图像中均发现次要伪影。IR 图像中的图像噪声降低。尽管保持相同的 CTDI(vol),但可以通过增加管电压来减少体外 PHV 相关伪影。尽管 MARF 比 IR 更有效,但它会引起次要伪影。