Suppr超能文献

人工心脏瓣膜 CT 成像的伪影减少策略。

Artifact reduction strategies for prosthetic heart valve CT imaging.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, E01.132, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Dec;28(8):2099-108. doi: 10.1007/s10554-012-0041-5. Epub 2012 Apr 5.

Abstract

Multislice CT evaluation of prosthetic heart valves (PHV) is limited by PHV-related artifacts. We assessed the influence of different kV settings, a metal artifact reduction filter (MARF) and an iterative reconstruction algorithm (IR) on PHV-induced artifacts in an in vitro model. A Medtronic-Hall tilting disc and St Jude bileafet PHV were imaged using a 64-slice scanner with 100 kV/165 mAs, 120 kV/100 mAs, 140 kV/67 mAs at an equal CTDI(vol). Images were reconstructed with (1) filtered back projection (FBP), (2) IR, (3) MARF and (4) MARF and IR. Hypo- and hyperdense artifacts volumes (mean mm(3) ± SD) were quantified with 2 thresholds (≤-50 and ≥175 Hounsfield Units). Image noise was measured and the presence of secondary artifacts was scored by 2 observers independently. Mean hypodense artifacts for the Medtronic-Hall/St Jude valve (FBP) were 966 ± 23/1,738 ± 21 at 100 kV, 610 ± 13/991 ± 12 at 120 kV, and 420 ± 9/634 ± 9 at 140 kV. Compared to FBP, hypodense artifact reductions for IR were 9/8 %, 10/7 % and 12/6 % respectively, for MARF 92 %/84 %, 89/81 % and 86/77 % respectively; for MARF + IR 94/85 %, 92/82 %, and 90/79 % respectively. Mean hyperdense artifacts for the Medtronic-Hall/St Jude valve were 5,530 ± 48/6,940 ± 70 at 100 kV, 5,120 ± 42/6,250 ± 53 at 120 kV, and 5,011 ± 52/6,000 ± 0 at 140 kV. Reductions for IR were 2/2 %, 2/3 % and 3/4 % respectively, for MARF were 9/30 %, 0/25 %, 5/22 % respectively, MARF + IR 12/32 %, 4/27 % and 7/25 % respectively. Secondary artifacts were found in all MARF images. Image noise was reduced in the IR images. In vitro PHV-related artifacts can be reduced by increasing kV despite maintaining identical CTDI(vol). Although MARF is more effective than IR, it induces secondary artifacts.

摘要

多层螺旋 CT 评估人工心脏瓣膜(PHV)受到 PHV 相关伪影的限制。我们评估了不同管电压设置、金属伪影减少滤波器(MARF)和迭代重建算法(IR)对体外模型中 PHV 引起的伪影的影响。使用 64 层扫描仪对美敦力-霍尔倾斜盘和圣犹达双叶 PHV 进行成像,管电压分别为 100 kV/165 mAs、120 kV/100 mAs 和 140 kV/67 mAs,CTDI(vol)相同。使用(1)滤波反投影(FBP)、(2)IR、(3)MARF 和(4)MARF 和 IR 对图像进行重建。使用 2 个阈值(≤-50 和≥175 亨氏单位)定量测量低和高密度伪影体积(平均 mm(3) ± SD)。由 2 名观察者独立测量图像噪声并评分次要伪影。美敦力-霍尔/圣犹达瓣膜(FBP)的平均低密度伪影在 100 kV 时为 966 ± 23/1738 ± 21,在 120 kV 时为 610 ± 13/991 ± 12,在 140 kV 时为 420 ± 9/634 ± 9。与 FBP 相比,IR 的低密度伪影减少分别为 9/8%、10/7%和 12/6%,MARF 分别为 92/84%、89/81%和 86/77%;MARF+IR 分别为 94/85%、92/82%和 90/79%。美敦力-霍尔/圣犹达瓣膜的平均高密度伪影在 100 kV 时为 5530 ± 48/6940 ± 70,在 120 kV 时为 5120 ± 42/6250 ± 53,在 140 kV 时为 5011 ± 52/6000 ± 0。IR 的减少分别为 2/2%、2/3%和 3/4%,MARF 分别为 9/30%、0/25%、5/22%,MARF+IR 分别为 12/32%、4/27%和 7/25%。所有 MARF 图像中均发现次要伪影。IR 图像中的图像噪声降低。尽管保持相同的 CTDI(vol),但可以通过增加管电压来减少体外 PHV 相关伪影。尽管 MARF 比 IR 更有效,但它会引起次要伪影。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bc5/3485534/a2147fb32db9/10554_2012_41_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验