• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无症状及手术高危患者的颈动脉支架置入术:单中心、单术者的结果

Carotid artery stenting in asymptomatic and surgically high-risk patients: single-centre, single-operator results.

作者信息

Veselka Josef, Zimolová Petra, Cerná Daniela, Stanka Pavel, Tomek Aleš, Srámek Martin

机构信息

Cardiovascular Center, University Hospital Motol, 1st Medical School, Prague, Czech Republic Prague, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Int J Angiol. 2008 Winter;17(4):207-10. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1278311.

DOI:10.1055/s-0031-1278311
PMID:22477451
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2728922/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stroke represents the third leading cause of death in developed countries and the leading cause of disability in the elderly. Because asymptomatic, surgically high-risk patients have been systematically excluded from randomized trials of carotid endarterectomy and medical therapy, the management of this group of patients is still controversial. A single-centre, single-operator registry was analyzed to evaluate feasibility and safety of carotid artery stenting (CAS) with distal protection devices in consecutive, asymptomatic, surgically high-risk patients who were scheduled for endovascular treatment of significant carotid stenoses.

METHODS

A total of 122 consecutive, surgically high-risk, asymptomatic patients (150 carotid arteries, 59% men, mean [± SD] age 69±9 years) with severe carotid stenosis and one or more high-risk features for carotid endarterectomy were scheduled for CAS. All procedures were performed in a single centre by a single operator. All patients were prospectively asked to undergo a clinical 30-day follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 154 stents were implanted in 150 carotid arteries. The primary success rate was 98.7%. The rates of stenosis before and after direct CAS were 81%±9% and 10%±13%, respectively. The median of fluoroscopic time of direct CAS was 6 min (range 2.5 min to 31.5 min). At 30 days, data were available in all patients. The combined 30-day mortality and stroke rate was 1.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term outcomes of CAS in asymptomatic, surgically high-risk patients treated by a single operator suggest a low periprocedural complication rate.

摘要

背景

中风是发达国家第三大致死原因,也是老年人残疾的主要原因。由于无症状、手术高风险患者被系统地排除在颈动脉内膜切除术和药物治疗的随机试验之外,这组患者的治疗仍存在争议。分析了一项单中心、单操作者登记研究,以评估在计划接受血管内治疗严重颈动脉狭窄的连续无症状、手术高风险患者中,使用远端保护装置进行颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)的可行性和安全性。

方法

共有122例连续的、手术高风险、无症状患者(150条颈动脉,男性占59%,平均年龄[±标准差]69±9岁),患有严重颈动脉狭窄且具有一项或多项颈动脉内膜切除术高风险特征,计划接受CAS治疗。所有手术均在单中心由一名操作者完成。所有患者均被前瞻性地要求接受30天的临床随访。

结果

共在150条颈动脉中植入了154个支架。主要成功率为98.7%。直接CAS术前和术后的狭窄率分别为81%±9%和10%±13%。直接CAS的透视时间中位数为6分钟(范围2.5分钟至31.5分钟)。在30天时,所有患者都有可用数据。30天的合并死亡率和中风率为1.3%。

结论

由一名操作者治疗的无症状、手术高风险患者CAS的短期结果表明围手术期并发症发生率较低。

相似文献

1
Carotid artery stenting in asymptomatic and surgically high-risk patients: single-centre, single-operator results.无症状及手术高危患者的颈动脉支架置入术:单中心、单术者的结果
Int J Angiol. 2008 Winter;17(4):207-10. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1278311.
2
Remote pre-procedural ischemic stroke as the greatest risk in carotid‑stenting‑associated stroke and death: a single center's experience.远程术前缺血性卒中是颈动脉支架置入相关卒中和死亡的最大风险:单中心经验
Int Angiol. 2017 Aug;36(4):306-315. doi: 10.23736/S0392-9590.16.03737-8. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
3
Results of carotid artery stenting with distal embolic protection with improved systems: Protected Carotid Artery Stenting in Patients at High Risk for Carotid Endarterectomy (PROTECT) trial.采用改良系统的颈动脉支架置入术治疗伴有远端栓塞保护装置的结果:高危颈动脉内膜切除术患者颈动脉支架置入术保护(PROTECT)试验。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Apr;55(4):968-976.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.10.120. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
4
Outcomes of carotid artery stenting in high-risk patients with carotid artery stenosis: a single neurovascular center retrospective review of 101 consecutive patients.颈动脉狭窄高危患者颈动脉支架置入术的结果:单神经血管中心 101 例连续患者的回顾性研究。
Neurosurgery. 2010 Mar;66(3):448-53; discussion 453-4. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000365008.17803.AD.
5
Patient characteristics and outcomes of carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting: analysis of the German mandatory national quality assurance registry - 2003 to 2014.颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术的患者特征及结局:对2003年至2014年德国强制性国家质量保证登记处的分析
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2015 Dec;56(6):827-36. Epub 2015 Sep 18.
6
Carotid artery stenting in clinical practice results from the Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS)-registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausarzte (ALKK).临床实践中的颈动脉支架置入术源于德国心脏病医院协会(ALKK)的颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)登记研究。
Z Kardiol. 2005 Mar;94(3):163-72. doi: 10.1007/s00392-005-0195-4.
7
Outcome of carotid artery stenting in the hands of vascular surgeons.血管外科医生进行颈动脉支架置入术的结果。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017 Aug;402(5):805-810. doi: 10.1007/s00423-017-1585-6. Epub 2017 May 30.
8
Staged carotid angioplasty and stenting followed by cardiac surgery in patients with severe asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis: early and long-term results.重度无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者先行分期颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术,随后进行心脏手术:早期和长期结果
Circulation. 2007 Oct 30;116(18):2036-42. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.658625. Epub 2007 Oct 15.
9
A prospective randomized trial comparing endarterectomy to stenting in severe asymptomatic carotid stenosis.一项比较严重无症状颈动脉狭窄患者行内膜切除术与支架置入术的前瞻性随机试验。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2017 Dec;58(6):814-817. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.16.09513-6. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
10
Duration of asymptomatic status and outcomes following carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs Stenting Trial.无症状状态持续时间和颈动脉内膜切除术与颈动脉支架置入术在颈动脉血运重建内膜切除术与支架置入术试验中的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jun;69(6):1797-1800. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.09.054. Epub 2019 Jan 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Atherosclerotic Plaque Composition Is Still an Almost Unrecognized Factor of Risk Stratification in Patients with Carotid Artery Disease.动脉粥样硬化斑块成分仍是颈动脉疾病患者风险分层中一个几乎未被认识的因素。
Int J Angiol. 2015 Sep;24(3):155-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1554801. Epub 2015 Jun 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Carotid angioplasty and stenting in octogenarians: is it safe?八旬老人的颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术:安全吗?
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Sep 1;72(3):309-317. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21574.
2
Carotid artery stenting in elderly patients: importance of case selection.老年患者的颈动脉支架置入术:病例选择的重要性。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Sep 1;72(3):318-324. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21620.
3
Carotid artery stent placement is safe in the very elderly (> or =80 years).在高龄(≥80岁)患者中,颈动脉支架置入术是安全的。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Sep 1;72(3):303-308. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21635.
4
Predictors of death and stroke after carotid angioplasty and stenting: a subgroup analysis of the Pro-CAS data.颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术后死亡和中风的预测因素:Pro-CAS数据的亚组分析
Stroke. 2008 Aug;39(8):2325-30. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.514356. Epub 2008 Jun 26.
5
Thirty-day outcomes of direct carotid artery stenting with cerebral protection in high-risk patients.
Circ J. 2007 Sep;71(9):1468-72. doi: 10.1253/circj.71.1468.
6
Short- and long-term outcome after carotid artery stenting with neuroprotection: single-center experience within a prospective registry.采用神经保护装置的颈动脉支架置入术后短期和长期预后:前瞻性注册研究中的单中心经验
Clin Res Cardiol. 2007 Nov;96(11):812-21. doi: 10.1007/s00392-007-0561-5. Epub 2007 Aug 17.
7
ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN 2007 clinical expert consensus document on carotid stenting: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents (ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN Clinical Expert Consensus Document Committee on Carotid Stenting).ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN 2007年颈动脉支架置入术临床专家共识文件:美国心脏病学基金会临床专家共识文件特别工作组报告(ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN颈动脉支架置入术临床专家共识文件委员会)
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Jan 2;49(1):126-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.10.021.
8
Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis.有症状的重度颈动脉狭窄患者行内膜切除术与支架置入术的比较
N Engl J Med. 2006 Oct 19;355(16):1660-71. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa061752.
9
Carotid artery stenting: first consensus document of the ICCS-SPREAD Joint Committee.颈动脉支架置入术:ICCS-SPREAD联合委员会的第一份共识文件。
Stroke. 2006 Sep;37(9):2400-9. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000236101.09480.b7. Epub 2006 Aug 10.
10
[Position paper on the indication for and implementation of interventional treatment of extracranial carotid stenosis].[关于颅外颈动脉狭窄介入治疗的适应证及实施的立场文件]
Clin Res Cardiol. 2006;95 Suppl 4:85-91. doi: 10.1007/s00392-006-2004-0.