Paniagua F A
Behav Anal. 1990 Fall;13(2):107-19. doi: 10.1007/BF03392528.
A variety of names have been given to procedures used in correspondence training, some more descriptive than others. In this article I argue that a terminology more accurately describing actual procedures, rather than the conceptual function that those procedures are assumed to serve, would benefit the area of correspondence training. I identify two documented procedures during the reinforcement of verbalization phase and five procedures during the reinforcement of correspondence phase and suggest that those procedures can be classified, or grouped into nonoverlapping categories, by specifying the critical dimensions of those procedures belonging to a single category. I suggest that the names of such nonoverlapping categories should clearly specify the dimensions on which the classification is based in order to facilitate experimental comparison of procedures, and to be able to recognize when a new procedure (as opposed to a variant of one already in existence) is developed. Future research involving comparative analysis across and within procedures is discussed within the framework of the proposed classification.
对应训练中使用的程序有各种各样的名称，有些比其他的更具描述性。在本文中，我认为一种能更准确描述实际程序而非这些程序被假定所服务的概念功能的术语，将有益于对应训练领域。我确定了言语化强化阶段的两种已记录程序以及对应强化阶段的五种程序，并建议通过指定属于单个类别的那些程序的关键维度，可以将这些程序分类或分组为不重叠的类别。我建议这种不重叠类别的名称应明确指定分类所基于的维度，以便于程序的实验比较，并能够识别何时开发出一种新程序（与已存在的程序变体相对）。在提出的分类框架内讨论了未来涉及程序间和程序内比较分析的研究。
