Whitman T L, Scibak J W, Butler K M, Richter R, Johnson M R
J Appl Behav Anal. 1982 Winter;15(4):545-64. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1982.15-545.
Except for a few studies, most research investigating correspondence training procedures has been more analogue in nature. The purpose of the present set of studies was to examine whether a "say-do" correspondence training technique could be used with children in special education classes to improve classroom behavior. The specific behaviors targeted for change included: out-of-seat behavior (Experiment 1), sitting posture (Experiment 2), and on-task behavior (Experiment 3). The say-do procedure used in Experiment 1 resembled that of previous studies, whereas that in Experiment 2 was more elaborate in the specificity of verbal statements required from the children and the feedback given them. The training procedure in Experiment 3 used a format similar to the say-do approach, but stressed visual rather than verbal cuing because it was used with nonverbal children. All three studies used single-subject designs and examined maintenance and/or generalization questions. Experiments 2 and 3 also evaluated whether concomitant changes in performance on academic tasks occurred. The results of the three studies provide strong evidence that correspondence training can be effectively used with educationally handicapped children. Moreover, the successful modification of the "say-do" to a "show-do" procedure in Experiment 3 points out the flexibility of the correspondence training approach.
除了少数研究外,大多数关于对应训练程序的研究本质上更具模拟性。本系列研究的目的是检验一种“说做”对应训练技术是否可用于特殊教育班级的儿童,以改善课堂行为。针对改变的具体行为包括:离座行为(实验1)、坐姿(实验2)和任务专注行为(实验3)。实验1中使用的“说做”程序类似于先前的研究,而实验2中的程序在对儿童要求的言语陈述的具体性以及给予他们的反馈方面更为精细。实验3中的训练程序使用了类似于“说做”方法的形式,但强调视觉而非言语提示,因为它是用于非言语儿童的。所有三项研究都采用了单受试者设计,并研究了维持和/或泛化问题。实验2和3还评估了学业任务表现是否伴随发生变化。这三项研究的结果提供了有力证据,表明对应训练可有效地用于有教育障碍的儿童。此外,实验3中成功地将“说做”程序修改为“展示做”程序,指出了对应训练方法的灵活性。