• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[胆管结石治疗中降低医院成本:一项比较研究]

[Minimising hospital costs in the treatment of bile duct calculi: a comparison study].

作者信息

Jorba Martín Rosa, Ramirez Maldonado Elena, Fabregat Prous Joan, Buisac González Dolors, Banqué Navarro Marta, Gornals Soler Joan, Busquets Barenys Juli, Ramos Rubio Emilio, Peláez Serra Núria, Lladó Garriga Laura, Rafecas Renau Antoni

机构信息

Servicio de Cirugía General y Aparato Digestivo, Consorci Sanitari Integral, L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, España.

出版信息

Cir Esp. 2012 May;90(5):310-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2012.02.003. Epub 2012 Apr 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.ciresp.2012.02.003
PMID:22480916
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The treatment of bile duct calculi associated with cholelithiasis is controversial. The hospital costs could be a decisive factor in choosing between the different therapeutic options.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effectiveness and costs of two options in the treatment of common bile duct calculi: 1) One-stage: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and bile duct exploration, and 2) Two-stage: sequential endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective, observational study was performed on 49 consecutive patients with bile duct calculi and gallbladder in situ, treated consecutively and simultaneously over a two year period. The post-operate complication, hospital stay, number of procedures per patient, conversion to laparotomy, efficacy of removing the calculi, and hospital costs.

RESULTS

There were no differences as regards the patient clinical features or morbidity. The mean post-surgical hospital stay for the One-stage group was less than that in the Two-stage group. Three patients of the Two-stage group required conversion to laparotomy. The median costs per patient were less for the One-stage strategy, representing an overall saving of 37,173€ during the period studied.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant differences were found between the two treatment options as regards efficacy or post-surgical morbidity and mortality, but there were differences in hospital stay and costs. The management of patients with gallstones in one-stage surgery represents a saving of 3 days hospital stay and 1,008€ per patient.

摘要

引言

胆囊结石合并胆管结石的治疗存在争议。在选择不同的治疗方案时,医院费用可能是一个决定性因素。

目的

比较两种治疗胆总管结石方案的有效性和成本:1)一期手术:腹腔镜胆囊切除术和胆管探查术;2)二期手术:序贯性内镜逆行胰胆管造影术和腹腔镜胆囊切除术。

材料与方法

对连续两年内连续收治的49例胆管结石合并原位胆囊患者进行回顾性观察研究。观察术后并发症、住院时间、每位患者的手术次数、中转开腹情况、结石清除效果及住院费用。

结果

患者的临床特征和发病率无差异。一期手术组术后平均住院时间短于二期手术组。二期手术组有3例患者需要中转开腹。一期手术策略每位患者的中位费用更低,在所研究期间总体节省了37173欧元。

结论

两种治疗方案在疗效、术后发病率和死亡率方面无显著差异,但在住院时间和费用方面存在差异。一期手术治疗胆结石患者可节省3天的住院时间,每位患者节省1008欧元。

相似文献

1
[Minimising hospital costs in the treatment of bile duct calculi: a comparison study].[胆管结石治疗中降低医院成本:一项比较研究]
Cir Esp. 2012 May;90(5):310-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2012.02.003. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
2
["Sequential" treatment: is it the best alternative in cholecysto-choledochal lithiasis?].["序贯"治疗:它是胆囊胆总管结石的最佳选择吗?]
Chir Ital. 2002 Nov-Dec;54(6):785-98.
3
Single-step treatment of gall bladder and bile duct stones: a combined endoscopic-laparoscopic technique.胆囊和胆管结石的单步治疗:一种内镜-腹腔镜联合技术。
Int J Surg. 2009 Aug;7(4):338-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2009.05.005. Epub 2009 May 27.
4
[Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and lithiasis of the common bile duct: prospective study on the importance of preoperative endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography].[腹腔镜胆囊切除术与胆总管结石:关于术前内镜超声检查和内镜逆行胰胆管造影重要性的前瞻性研究]
Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1998 Oct;22(10):759-65.
5
[Laparoscopic surgical treatment of cholecysto-choledochal calculi. A single step solution].[腹腔镜手术治疗胆囊胆总管结石。一步解决方案]
Chir Ital. 2000 Nov-Dec;52(6):663-8.
6
Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration after failed endoscopic stone extraction.内镜下取石失败后行腹腔镜胆总管探查术。
Endoscopy. 1997 Sep;29(7):609-13. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1004265.
7
Cost-effective management of complicated choledocholithiasis: laparoscopic transcystic duct exploration or endoscopic sphincterotomy.复杂胆总管结石的经济高效管理:腹腔镜经胆囊管探查术或内镜括约肌切开术。
J Am Coll Surg. 1996 Jun;182(6):488-94.
8
Endoscopic management of common bile duct stones leaving the gallbladder in situ. A cohort study with long-term follow-up.保留胆囊原位的胆总管结石的内镜治疗。一项长期随访的队列研究。
Dig Surg. 2004;21(1):60-4; discussion 65. doi: 10.1159/000075944. Epub 2003 Dec 30.
9
A cost analysis of the treatment of common bile duct stones discovered during cholecystectomy.
Semin Laparosc Surg. 2000 Dec;7(4):302-7.
10
Evolving management of common bile duct stones in the laparoscopic era.腹腔镜时代胆总管结石的管理进展
J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1997 Dec;42(6):389-94.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison between Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI®) and Clavien-Dindo Classification for laparoscopic single-stage treatment of choledocholithiasis with concomitant cholelithiasis.综合并发症指数(CCI®)与 Clavien-Dindo 分级在腹腔镜一期治疗胆总管结石合并胆囊结石中的比较。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Feb 23;408(1):100. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02840-5.
2
Contemporary management of concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones: a survey of Spanish surgeons.当代胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的治疗:西班牙外科医生的调查。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Sep;35(9):5024-5033. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07984-9. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
3
Eleven years of primary closure of common bile duct after choledochotomy for choledocholithiasis.
胆总管切开取石术后胆总管一期缝合11年的经验。 (你提供的原文可能表述不太完整准确,推测这样翻译更符合医学语境表达的意思,完整准确的原文翻译应该是:胆总管切开取石术后胆总管一期缝合11年的经验总结之类的表述 ) (这里括号内内容不是翻译内容,是对翻译情况的说明,你可按需求决定是否保留)
Surg Endosc. 2016 May;30(5):1975-82. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4424-2. Epub 2015 Jul 23.