Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division, National Exposure Research Laboratory Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2012 Mar;62(3):287-98. doi: 10.1080/10473289.2011.649155.
Emissions factors are important for estimating and characterizing emissions from sources of air pollution. There is no quantitative indication of uncertainty for these emission factors, most factors do not have an adequate data set to compute uncertainty, and it is very difficult to locate the data for those that do. The objectives are to compare the current emission factors of Electric Generating Unit NOx sources with currently available continuous emission monitoring data, develop quantitative uncertainty indicators for the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) data quality rated emission factors, and determine the possible ranges of uncertainty associated with EPA's data quality rating of emission factors. EPA's data letter rating represents a general indication of the robustness of the emission factor and is assigned based on the estimated reliability of the tests used to develop the factor and on the quantity and representativeness of the data. Different sources and pollutants that have the same robustness in the measured emission factor and in the representativeness of the measured values are assumed to have a similar quantifiable uncertainty. For the purposes of comparison, we assume that the emission factor estimates from source categories with the same letter rating have enough robustness and consistency that we can quantify the uncertainty of these common emission factors based on the qualitative indication of data quality which is known for almost all factors. The results showed that EPA's current emission factor values for NOx emissions from combustion sources were found to be reasonably representative for some sources; however AP-42 values should be updated for over half of the sources to reflect current data. The quantified uncertainty ranges were found to be 25-62% for A rated emission factors, 45-75% for B rated emission factors, 60-82% for C rated emission factors, and 69-86% for D rated emission factors, and 82-92% for E rated emission factors.
排放因子对于估算和描述空气污染源的排放非常重要。这些排放因子没有定量的不确定性指示,大多数因子没有足够的数据来计算不确定性,而且对于那些确实存在数据的因子,很难找到这些数据。本研究的目的是将当前的发电机组 NOx 源排放因子与现有的连续排放监测数据进行比较,为美国环保署(EPA)数据质量评级的排放因子开发定量的不确定性指标,并确定与 EPA 排放因子数据质量评级相关的不确定性的可能范围。EPA 的数据信函评级代表了排放因子稳健性的一般指示,是根据用于开发因子的测试的估计可靠性以及数据的数量和代表性来分配的。具有相同测量排放因子稳健性和测量值代表性的不同来源和污染物被认为具有相似的可量化不确定性。出于比较的目的,我们假设具有相同字母评级的源类别中的排放因子估计值具有足够的稳健性和一致性,我们可以根据几乎所有因子都已知的定性数据质量指示来量化这些常见排放因子的不确定性。结果表明,EPA 目前对于燃烧源的 NOx 排放的排放因子值在某些源中被发现是合理的代表;然而,对于一半以上的源,AP-42 值应该更新,以反映当前的数据。量化的不确定性范围分别为 A 级排放因子的 25-62%,B 级排放因子的 45-75%,C 级排放因子的 60-82%,D 级排放因子的 69-86%,以及 E 级排放因子的 82-92%。