• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对被认定有学习障碍的中学生的阅读干预效果

Efficacy of a Reading Intervention for Middle School Students Identified with Learning Disabilities.

作者信息

Wanzek Jeanne, Vaughn Sharon, Roberts Greg, Fletcher Jack M

出版信息

Except Child. 2011 Fall;78(1):73-87. doi: 10.1177/001440291107800105.

DOI:10.1177/001440291107800105
PMID:22485052
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3324302/
Abstract

This experimental study reports findings on the effects from a year-long reading intervention providing daily, 50-minute sessions to middle-school students with identified learning disabilities (n = 65) compared with similar students who did not receive the reading intervention (n = 55). All students continued to receive their special education services as provided by the school. Results indicated statistically significant findings favoring the treatment group for sight word reading fluency following intervention. Small effects were found for phonemic decoding fluency and passage comprehension. No other statistically significant differences were noted between groups. The findings suggest that while gains on word reading fluency resulted from the additional reading treatment, accelerating the reading performance of students identified with learning disabilities may be unlikely to result from a one-year, daily intervention provided to students in groups of 10-15.

摘要

本实验研究报告了一项为期一年的阅读干预效果。该干预为65名已确诊有学习障碍的中学生每天提供50分钟的课程,并与55名未接受阅读干预的类似学生进行对比。所有学生继续接受学校提供的特殊教育服务。结果表明,干预后在视觉词阅读流畅性方面,治疗组有统计学意义上的显著结果。在音素解码流畅性和篇章理解方面发现了较小的效果。两组之间未发现其他统计学上的显著差异。研究结果表明,虽然额外的阅读治疗使单词阅读流畅性有所提高,但对已确诊有学习障碍的学生而言,通过为10 - 15人的小组学生提供为期一年的每日干预来加速其阅读表现可能不太可能实现。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of a Reading Intervention for Middle School Students Identified with Learning Disabilities.针对被认定有学习障碍的中学生的阅读干预效果
Except Child. 2011 Fall;78(1):73-87. doi: 10.1177/001440291107800105.
2
Improving English reading fluency and comprehension for children with reading fluency disabilities.提高阅读流畅性障碍儿童的英语阅读流畅性和理解能力。
Dyslexia. 2022 Feb;28(1):79-96. doi: 10.1002/dys.1695. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
3
Intervention Provided to Linguistically Diverse Middle School Students with Severe Reading Difficulties.为有严重阅读困难的语言多样化的中学生提供的干预措施。
Learn Disabil Res Pract. 2008 May 1;23(2):79-89. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5826.2008.00266.x. Epub 2008 Apr 11.
4
The Effects of ADHD Treatment and Reading Intervention on the Fluency and Comprehension of Children with ADHD and Word Reading Difficulties: A Randomized Clinical Trial.注意力缺陷多动障碍治疗与阅读干预对患有注意力缺陷多动障碍及单词阅读困难儿童流畅性和阅读理解能力的影响:一项随机临床试验
Sci Stud Read. 2020;24(1):72-89. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2019.1640704. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
5
Effects of Tier 3 Intervention for Students With Persistent Reading Difficulties and Characteristics of Inadequate Responders.针对持续存在阅读困难学生的三级干预效果及反应不足者的特征
J Educ Psychol. 2013 Aug;105(3):633-648. doi: 10.1037/a0032581.
6
The Effects of Reading Fluency Interventions on the Reading Fluency and Reading Comprehension Performance of Elementary Students With Learning Disabilities: A Synthesis of the Research from 2001 to 2014.阅读流畅性干预对学习障碍小学生阅读流畅性和阅读理解表现的影响:2001年至2014年研究综述
J Learn Disabil. 2017 Sep/Oct;50(5):576-590. doi: 10.1177/0022219416638028. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
7
Response to Intervention for Middle School Students With Reading Difficulties: Effects of a Primary and Secondary Intervention.对有阅读困难的中学生的干预反应:初级和次级干预的效果
School Psych Rev. 2010;39(1):3-21.
8
The Efficacy of Repeated Reading and Wide Reading Practice for High School Students with Severe Reading Disabilities.重复阅读与泛读练习对重度阅读障碍高中生的效果
Learn Disabil Res Pract. 2010 Feb 1;25(1):2-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5826.2009.00296.x.
9
Decoding intervention for young students with mild intellectual disabilities: A single-subject design study.对轻度智力障碍的年轻学生进行解码干预:一项单被试设计研究。
J Intellect Disabil. 2024 Dec;28(4):1095-1108. doi: 10.1177/17446295231208819. Epub 2023 Nov 11.
10
Parent-child play therapy effect on 10 to 12-Year-old student' reading performance: a case of chinese male students with learning disabilities.亲子游戏治疗对10至12岁学生阅读表现的影响:以患有学习障碍的中国男学生为例。
BMC Psychol. 2025 Feb 22;13(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02436-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Cognitive Training Combined with Multifocal tDCS over the Reading Network Improves Reading Performance: A Case of Severe Dyslexia.认知训练结合阅读网络上的多焦点经颅直流电刺激可改善阅读表现:一例严重诵读困难病例
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 11;14(16):5671. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165671.
2
Targeted school-based interventions for improving reading and mathematics for students with or at risk of academic difficulties in Grades K-6: A systematic review.针对K-6年级有学习困难或有学习困难风险的学生提高阅读和数学能力的校本干预措施:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 6;17(2):e1152. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1152. eCollection 2021 Jun.
3
Targeted school-based interventions for improving reading and mathematics for students with, or at risk of, academic difficulties in Grades 7-12: A systematic review.针对7至12年级有学习困难或有学习困难风险的学生提高阅读和数学能力的校本干预措施:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 1;16(2):e1081. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1081. eCollection 2020 Jun.
4
Efficacy of a Word- and Text-Based Intervention for Students With Significant Reading Difficulties.基于词汇和文本的干预对有显著阅读困难的学生的疗效。
J Learn Disabil. 2019 Jan/Feb;52(1):31-44. doi: 10.1177/0022219418775113. Epub 2018 May 23.
5
A Century of Progress: Reading Interventions for Students in Grades 4-12, 1914-2014.一个世纪的进步:1914 - 2014年针对4至12年级学生的阅读干预措施
Rev Educ Res. 2016 Sep;86(3):756-800. doi: 10.3102/0034654316652942. Epub 2016 Jul 9.
6
A Meta-Analysis of Interventions for Struggling Readers in Grades 4-12: 1980-2011.对4至12年级阅读困难学生干预措施的元分析:1980年至2011年
J Learn Disabil. 2015 Jul-Aug;48(4):369-90. doi: 10.1177/0022219413504995. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
7
Response to intervention with secondary school students with reading difficulties.中学阅读困难学生的干预反应。
J Learn Disabil. 2012 May-Jun;45(3):244-56. doi: 10.1177/0022219412442157. Epub 2012 Apr 6.
8
Effects of intensive reading intervention for eighth-grade students with persistently inadequate response to intervention.强化阅读干预对八年级学生持续干预反应不足的影响。
J Learn Disabil. 2012 Nov-Dec;45(6):515-25. doi: 10.1177/0022219411402692. Epub 2011 Apr 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Response to Intervention: Preventing and Remediating Academic Difficulties.干预反应:预防与纠正学业困难
Child Dev Perspect. 2009 Apr;3(1):30-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00072.x.
2
Response to Intervention for Middle School Students With Reading Difficulties: Effects of a Primary and Secondary Intervention.对有阅读困难的中学生的干预反应:初级和次级干预的效果
School Psych Rev. 2010;39(1):3-21.
3
The relative effects of group size on reading progress of older students with reading difficulties.小组规模对有阅读困难的大龄学生阅读进步的相对影响。
Read Writ. 2010;23(8):931-956. doi: 10.1007/s11145-009-9183-9.
4
Response to Intervention with Older Students with Reading Difficulties.对有阅读困难的大龄学生进行干预的回应
Learn Individ Differ. 2008;18(3):338-345. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2008.05.001.
5
Response to intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between children with and without reading disabilities: Evidence for the role of kindergarten and first-grade interventions.作为区分有阅读障碍和无阅读障碍儿童手段的干预反应:幼儿园和一年级干预作用的证据
J Learn Disabil. 2006 Mar-Apr;39(2):157-69. doi: 10.1177/00222194060390020401.
6
Feasibility and consequences of response to intervention: examination of the issues and scientific evidence as a model for the identification of individuals with learning disabilities.干预反应的可行性及后果:对相关问题和科学证据的审视,作为识别学习障碍个体的一种模式
J Learn Disabil. 2005 Nov-Dec;38(6):525-31. doi: 10.1177/00222194050380060801.
7
People are variables too: multilevel structural equations modeling.人也是变量:多层结构方程建模。
Psychol Methods. 2005 Sep;10(3):259-284. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.10.3.259.
8
Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches.针对重度阅读障碍儿童的强化补救教学:两种教学方法的即时和长期效果
J Learn Disabil. 2001 Jan-Feb;34(1):33-58, 78. doi: 10.1177/002221940103400104.
9
Dyslexia: cultural diversity and biological unity.阅读障碍:文化多样性与生物统一性
Science. 2001 Mar 16;291(5511):2165-7. doi: 10.1126/science.1057179.