Florida State University, FL 32303, USA.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2013 Aug;52(8):797-805.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2013.05.004. Epub 2013 Jun 29.
The present study examined the factor structure of autism symptoms in toddlers, to aid understanding of the phenotype during the developmental period that represents the earliest manifestations of autism symptoms. This endeavor is particularly timely, given changes in symptom structure from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) to the recently released Fifth Edition (DSM-5).
Factor structure was examined in a sample of toddlers between 12 and 30 months of age (mean = 20.37 months, SD = 3.32 months) diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and recruited from community settings or referred for evaluation (N = 237). Confirmatory factor analyses were conducted comparing the relative fit of 4 distinct, previously proposed and validated models: DSM-5, DSM-IV, 1-factor, and an alternative 3-factor model proposed by van Lang et al.
Findings revealed that the 1-factor model provided the poorest fit, followed by the DSM-IV model and the van Lang et al. model. The DSM-5 model provided the best fit to the data relative to other models and good absolute fit. Indicators for the confirmatory factor analyses, drawn from the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-Toddler Module (ADOS-T), loaded strongly onto the DSM-5 Social Communication and Social Interaction factor and more variably onto the DSM-5 Restricted/Repetitive Language and Behavior factor.
Results indicate that autism symptoms in toddlers, as measured by the ADOS-T, are separable and best deconstructed into the 2-factor DSM-5 structure, supporting the reorganization of symptoms in the DSM-5. Consistency of the present results in toddlers with previous studies in older children and adults suggests that the structure of autism symptoms may be similar throughout development.
本研究旨在探讨幼儿自闭症症状的因素结构,以帮助理解自闭症症状在发育阶段的表现型,该阶段代表自闭症症状的最早表现。鉴于从《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)到最近发布的第五版(DSM-5),自闭症症状的结构发生了变化,因此这项研究具有重要意义。
本研究对 12 至 30 个月大(平均年龄=20.37 个月,标准差=3.32 个月)、被诊断为自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)且来自社区环境或因评估而被招募的幼儿(N=237)样本进行了因素结构分析。采用验证性因子分析比较了 4 种不同的、先前提出和验证过的模型的相对拟合度,分别为 DSM-5、DSM-IV、1 因素和 van Lang 等人提出的替代 3 因素模型。
研究结果表明,1 因素模型的拟合度最差,其次是 DSM-IV 模型和 van Lang 等人的模型。DSM-5 模型与其他模型相比,对数据的拟合度更好,绝对拟合度也较好。来自孤独症诊断观察量表-幼儿模块(ADOS-T)的验证性因子分析指标强烈加载到 DSM-5 的社会沟通和社会互动因子上,对 DSM-5 的受限/重复语言和行为因子的加载则更加多变。
结果表明,ADOS-T 测量的幼儿自闭症症状可分离,最好分解为 DSM-5 的 2 因素结构,支持 DSM-5 中症状的重新组织。本研究在幼儿中的结果与以前在年龄较大的儿童和成人中的研究结果一致,表明自闭症症状的结构在整个发育过程中可能相似。