• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮肾镜或逆行肾内手术治疗直径 1-2cm 的肾结石:一项前瞻性对比研究。

Treating renal calculi 1-2 cm in diameter with minipercutaneous or retrograde intrarenal surgery: a prospective comparative study.

机构信息

Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital-Urology, Nadiad, Gujarat, India.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2012 Oct;110(8 Pt B):E346-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11089.x. Epub 2012 Apr 4.

DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11089.x
PMID:22487401
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To plan a prospective comparative case-control designed study aiming to compare minipercutaneous (miniperc) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for a renal calculus of size 1-2 cm.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 64 cases (32 in each arm) underwent miniperc and RIRS during the study period from March 2009 to April 2011. The primary and secondary outcome objective was stone-free rate and retreatment rate, complications, operation duration, patient visual pain scores, analgesic requirement, haemoglobin drop and hospital stay, respectively.

RESULTS

Miniperc and RIRS had stone clearance rates of 100% and 96.88%, respectively. In the RIRS group, one patient required retreatment at 1 month. Hospital stay (0.24) and intra-operative (0.99) and postoperative complications (0.60) were similar in both groups. Operation duration (P = 0.003) was lower in the miniperc group. Haemoglobin drop (P < 0.001), patient pain and visual analogue scale score (each P < 0.001) at 6, 24 and 48 h, as well as analgesic requirement (P < 0.003), were all lower in the RIRS group.

CONCLUSIONS

The stone clearances in both modalities are high and complications are low. RIRS requires a larger operation duration, although it is associated with favourable pain scores and a lower haemoglobin drop.

摘要

目的

计划一项前瞻性病例对照设计研究,旨在比较 1-2cm 肾结石的微创经皮肾镜取石术(miniperc)和逆行性肾内手术(RIRS)。

患者与方法

2009 年 3 月至 2011 年 4 月期间,共有 64 例患者(每组 32 例)接受了 miniperc 和 RIRS 治疗。主要和次要结局指标分别为结石清除率和再治疗率、并发症、手术时间、患者视觉疼痛评分、镇痛需求、血红蛋白下降和住院时间。

结果

miniperc 和 RIRS 的结石清除率分别为 100%和 96.88%。在 RIRS 组中,1 例患者在 1 个月时需要再次治疗。两组的住院时间(0.24)、术中(0.99)和术后并发症(0.60)相似。miniperc 组的手术时间(P=0.003)较低。RIRS 组血红蛋白下降(P<0.001)、术后 6、24 和 48 小时患者疼痛和视觉模拟评分(均 P<0.001)以及镇痛需求(P<0.003)均较低。

结论

两种方法的结石清除率均较高,并发症发生率较低。RIRS 需要更长的手术时间,但疼痛评分较低,血红蛋白下降更少。

相似文献

1
Treating renal calculi 1-2 cm in diameter with minipercutaneous or retrograde intrarenal surgery: a prospective comparative study.经皮肾镜或逆行肾内手术治疗直径 1-2cm 的肾结石:一项前瞻性对比研究。
BJU Int. 2012 Oct;110(8 Pt B):E346-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11089.x. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
2
Micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy (microperc) vs retrograde intrarenal surgery for the management of small renal calculi: a randomized controlled trial.微创经皮肾镜取石术(microperc)与逆行性肾内手术治疗小肾结石:一项随机对照试验。
BJU Int. 2013 Aug;112(3):355-61. doi: 10.1111/bju.12164.
3
Prospective comparative study of miniperc and standard PNL for treatment of 1 to 2 cm size renal stone.微创经皮肾镜取石术与标准经皮肾镜取石术治疗 1 至 2cm 肾结石的前瞻性对比研究。
BJU Int. 2011 Sep;108(6):896-9; discussion 899-900. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09936.x. Epub 2011 Apr 8.
4
Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde flexible nephrolithotripsy for the management of 2-4 cm stones: a matched-pair analysis.经皮肾镜碎石术与逆行软性肾镜碎石术治疗 2-4cm 结石的比较:配对分析。
BJU Int. 2012 May;109(9):1384-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10691.x. Epub 2011 Oct 28.
5
Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children with moderate-size kidney stones: results of multi-institutional analysis.比较逆行性肾内手术和微创经皮肾镜取石术治疗儿童中等大小肾结石:多机构分析结果。
Urology. 2012 Sep;80(3):519-23. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.04.018. Epub 2012 Jun 5.
6
Mini-percutaneous Nephrolithotomy vs Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Renal Stones Larger Than 10 mm: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.经皮肾镜微造瘘取石术与逆行性肾内手术治疗直径大于10毫米肾结石的前瞻性随机对照试验
Urology. 2015 Nov;86(5):873-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.08.011. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
7
Super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) vs retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of 1-2 cm lower-pole renal calculi: an international multicentre randomised controlled trial.超微经皮肾镜取石术(SMP)与逆行性肾内手术治疗 1-2cm 下极肾结石:一项国际多中心随机对照试验。
BJU Int. 2018 Dec;122(6):1034-1040. doi: 10.1111/bju.14427. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
8
A prospective, randomized comparison of shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery and miniperc for treatment of 1 to 2 cm radiolucent lower calyceal renal calculi: a single center experience.一项前瞻性、随机对照研究比较了冲击波碎石术、逆行肾内手术和 miniperc 治疗 1 至 2cm 透光性下盏肾结石:单中心经验。
J Urol. 2015 Jan;193(1):160-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.088. Epub 2014 Jul 24.
9
Comparative study of retrograde intrarenal surgery and micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of intermediate-sized kidney stones.逆行性肾内手术与微通道经皮肾镜取石术治疗中等大小肾结石的比较研究
Actas Urol Esp. 2014 Nov;38(9):576-83. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2014.04.004. Epub 2014 Jun 14.
10
Retrograde intrarenal surgery vs extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for intermediate size inferior pole calculi: a prospective assessment of objective and subjective outcomes.逆行肾内手术与体外冲击波碎石术治疗中等大小下极结石:客观和主观结局的前瞻性评估。
Urology. 2014 May;83(5):1016-22. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.12.026. Epub 2014 Feb 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Miniperc percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of juxta uretero-pelvic junction upper ureteric calculi: A prospective, randomized control study.微创经皮肾镜取石术与逆行肾内手术治疗肾盂输尿管连接部上段输尿管结石的前瞻性随机对照研究
Urol Ann. 2025 Jan-Mar;17(1):9-16. doi: 10.4103/ua.ua_48_24. Epub 2025 Jan 18.
2
Successful treatment of staghorn stones with flexible ureteroscopy and thulium fiber laser (TFL) lithotripsy: initial experience with 32 cases.采用输尿管软镜联合钬激光碎石术治疗鹿角形结石:32 例初步经验。
Urolithiasis. 2024 Jun 27;52(1):102. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01598-9.
3
Complete Stone Clearance after Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery among Patients with Urolithiasis in a Tertiary Care Centre: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.
在三级护理中心,肾结石患者接受逆行肾内手术后结石完全清除:一项描述性的横断面研究。
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2022 Dec 1;60(256):1033-1036. doi: 10.31729/jnma.7785.
4
The clinical efficiency and safety of 60W superpulse thulium fiber laser in retrograde intrarenal surgery.60W 超脉冲铥光纤激光在逆行性肾内手术中的临床疗效及安全性
Indian J Urol. 2022 Jul-Sep;38(3):191-196. doi: 10.4103/iju.iju_60_22. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
5
Is percutaneous nephrolithotomy effective and safe for children with solitary kidney?经皮肾镜取石术治疗孤立肾儿童的有效性和安全性如何?
Pediatr Surg Int. 2022 Aug;38(8):1171-1175. doi: 10.1007/s00383-022-05147-6. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
6
A comparative study of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery for solitary renal stone of 1-2 cm.微创经皮肾镜取石术与逆行肾内手术治疗1-2厘米孤立肾结石的对比研究
Urol Ann. 2021 Jul-Sep;13(3):226-231. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_10_20. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
7
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper urinary tract stones: a meta-analysis comparing clinical efficacy and safety.经皮肾镜碎石术与输尿管软镜碎石术治疗上尿路结石:比较临床疗效和安全性的荟萃分析。
BMC Urol. 2020 Jul 25;20(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00677-4.
8
Diagnosis accuracy of PCA3 level in patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis.PCA3 水平在前列腺癌患者中的诊断准确性:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Int Braz J Urol. 2020 Sep-Oct;46(5):786-793. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0521.
9
Long-term outcome after flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser for simultaneous treatment of a single renal cyst and ipsilateral renal stones.钬激光软性输尿管镜同期治疗单一肾囊肿和同侧肾结石的长期疗效
J Int Med Res. 2019 Aug;47(8):3601-3612. doi: 10.1177/0300060519855573. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
10
An easy risk stratification to recommend the optimal patients with 2-3 cm kidney stones to receive retrograde intrarenal surgery or mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy.一种简单的风险分层方法,用于推荐最佳的 2-3cm 肾结石患者接受逆行肾盂内手术或微创经皮肾镜取石术。
Urolithiasis. 2020 Apr;48(2):167-173. doi: 10.1007/s00240-019-01134-0. Epub 2019 May 17.