Herdman Kevin J, Choi Namok, Fuqua Dale R, Newman Jody L
Humana, Inc. USA.
Psychol Rep. 2012 Feb;110(1):227-32. doi: 10.2466/02.07.PR0.110.1.227-232.
This study tested the oblique four-factor model of the Gender Role Conflict Scale for a sample of gay men and lesbian women residing in the United States. 400 gay men and 292 lesbian women recruited from university and college gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender LISTSERVs participated. The internal consistency reliability of the Gender Role Conflict Scale scores was high, but low means on the expressive dimension of gender role conflict were noted. The results of two separate sets of confirmatory factor analyses indicated that the four-factor model's fit to the data could be enhanced for both groups by applying item parceling to lower the number of indicators per factor, suggesting that the actual structural validity of the Gender Role Conflict Scale may be better than suggested by the reported fit indices.
本研究针对居住在美国的男同性恋者和女同性恋者样本，对性别角色冲突量表的斜交四因素模型进行了测试。从大学和学院的男同性恋、女同性恋、双性恋及跨性别邮件列表中招募了400名男同性恋者和292名女同性恋者参与研究。性别角色冲突量表得分的内部一致性信度较高，但在性别角色冲突的表达维度上得分较低。两组单独的验证性因素分析结果表明，通过应用项目打包以减少每个因素的指标数量，四因素模型对两组数据的拟合度均可得到提高，这表明性别角色冲突量表的实际结构效度可能优于所报告的拟合指数所显示的情况。
