Department of Social Epidemiology, Institute of Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany.
Health Sciences Bremen, University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 18;19(12):7493. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127493.
Current trends in quantitative health research have highlighted the inadequacy of the usual operationalisation of sex and gender, resulting in a growing demand for more nuanced options. This scoping review provides an overview of recent instruments for the operationalisation of sex and gender in health-related research beyond a concept of mutually exclusive binary categories as male or masculine vs. female or feminine. Our search in three databases (Medline, Scopus and Web of Science) returned 9935 matches, of which 170 were included. From these, we identified 77 different instruments. The number and variety of instruments measuring sex and/or gender in quantitative health-related research increased over time. Most of these instruments were developed with a US-American student population. The majority of instruments focused on the assessment of gender based on a binary understanding, while sex or combinations of sex and gender were less frequently measured. Different populations may require the application of different instruments, and various research questions may ask for different dimensions of sex and gender to be studied. Despite the clear interest in the development of novel sex and/or gender instruments, future research needs to focus on new ways of operationalisation that account for their variability and multiple dimensions.
当前定量健康研究的趋势凸显了通常对性别概念的操作化方法的不足,这导致人们越来越需要更细致的选择。本范围综述概述了最近在健康相关研究中超越男性或男性化与女性或女性化相互排斥的二元类别概念来操作化性别的工具。我们在三个数据库(Medline、Scopus 和 Web of Science)中搜索,共返回了 9935 个匹配项,其中有 170 项被纳入。从这些中,我们确定了 77 种不同的工具。随着时间的推移,用于测量定量健康相关研究中性别和/或性别的工具的数量和种类有所增加。这些工具大多是为具有美国学生群体而开发的。大多数工具侧重于基于二元理解的性别评估,而性或性和性别的组合则较少被测量。不同的人群可能需要应用不同的工具,而各种研究问题可能需要研究性别的不同维度。尽管人们对开发新的性别工具明显感兴趣,但未来的研究需要关注能够考虑到其可变性和多个维度的新操作方法。