Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA.
J Neurosci. 2012 Apr 4;32(14):4913-22. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4504-11.2012.
A central tenet of motor neuroscience is that the cerebellum learns from sensory prediction errors. Surprisingly, neuroimaging studies have not revealed definitive signatures of error processing in the cerebellum. Furthermore, neurophysiologic studies suggest an asymmetry, such that the cerebellum may encode errors arising from unexpected sensory events, but not errors reflecting the omission of expected stimuli. We conducted an imaging study to compare the cerebellar response to these two types of errors. Participants made fast out-and-back reaching movements, aiming either for an object that delivered a force pulse if intersected or for a gap between two objects, either of which delivered a force pulse if intersected. Errors (missing the target) could therefore be signaled either through the presence or absence of a force pulse. In an initial analysis, the cerebellar BOLD response was smaller on trials with errors compared with trials without errors. However, we also observed an error-related decrease in heart rate. After correcting for variation in heart rate, increased activation during error trials was observed in the hand area of lobules V and VI. This effect was similar for the two error types. The results provide evidence for the encoding of errors resulting from either the unexpected presence or unexpected absence of sensory stimulation in the human cerebellum.
运动神经科学的一个中心原则是小脑通过感觉预测误差进行学习。令人惊讶的是,神经影像学研究并未揭示小脑内明确的错误处理特征。此外,神经生理学研究表明存在一种不对称性,即小脑可能编码由意外感觉事件引起的错误,但不能编码反映预期刺激缺失的错误。我们进行了一项影像学研究,以比较小脑对这两种类型错误的反应。参与者进行快速往返伸手运动,目标是如果交叉则会产生力脉冲的物体或两个物体之间的间隙,如果交叉则会产生力脉冲。因此,错误(错过目标)可以通过力脉冲的存在或缺失来指示。在初步分析中,与无错误试验相比,有错误试验时小脑的 BOLD 反应较小。然而,我们还观察到心率相关的错误减少。在对心率变化进行校正后,在手区的 V 和 VI 小叶中观察到错误试验时的激活增加。这两种错误类型的效果相似。结果为人类小脑对感觉刺激的意外出现或意外缺失引起的错误进行编码提供了证据。