Estación Biologica de Doñana, Seville, Spain.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012 Apr;86(4):642-8. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2012.11-0326.
Surveillance, research, and control of mosquito-borne diseases such as West Nile virus require efficient methods for sampling mosquitoes. We compared the efficacy of BG-Sentinel and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)-CO(2) traps in terms of the abundances of host-seeking and blood-fed female mosquitoes and the origin of mosquito bloodmeals. Our results indicate that BG-Sentinel traps that use CO(2) and attractants are as effective as CDC-CO(2) traps for Culex mosquito species, Ochlerotatus caspius, and they are also highly efficient at capturing Anopheles atroparvus host-seeking and blood-fed females with or without CO(2). The CDC-CO(2) trap is the least efficient method for capturing blood-fed females. BG-Sentinel traps with attractants and CO(2) were significantly better at capturing mosquitoes that had fed on mammals than the unbaited BG-Sentinel and CDC-CO(2) traps in the cases of An. atroparvus and Cx. theileri. These results may help researchers to optimize trapping methods by obtaining greater sample sizes and saving time and money.
监测、研究和控制西尼罗河病毒等蚊媒疾病需要有效的蚊子采样方法。我们比较了 BG-Sentinel 和疾病预防控制中心(CDC)-CO(2)诱捕器在宿主寻找和吸血雌性蚊子丰度以及蚊子血餐来源方面的效果。结果表明,使用 CO(2)和引诱剂的 BG-Sentinel 诱捕器与 CDC-CO(2)诱捕器对库蚊属、尖音库蚊和它们也非常有效地捕获疟蚊属的宿主寻找和吸血雌性蚊子,无论是否使用 CO(2)。CDC-CO(2)诱捕器是捕获吸血雌性蚊子效率最低的方法。带有引诱剂和 CO(2)的 BG-Sentinel 诱捕器在捕获以哺乳动物为食的蚊子方面明显优于未加诱饵的 BG-Sentinel 和 CDC-CO(2)诱捕器,在疟蚊属和库蚊属的情况下都是如此。这些结果可能有助于研究人员通过获得更大的样本量和节省时间和金钱来优化诱捕方法。